Started By
Message
re: I need some LSU fans to go on record.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:50 am to pankReb
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:50 am to pankReb
It is pretty fricking comical that they amended the suit for Lane practicing his free speech rights. Can’t you at least agree on that? It just adds to the whole hypocrisy of all of it.
1
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:51 am to pankReb
Not yet, but most of you guys on here are acting like liberals. There was even a guy on here that committed blasphemy with a prayer.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:51 am to pankReb
quote:
You continue to attempt to make an idiotic point by using Pavia’s case that the SEC will be financially responsible for the other two players. It didn’t work last night and it won’t work today. LSU removed any and all ability for the SEC to be held financially responsible
Oh my god
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:52 am to pankReb
quote:
You can sue for whatever you like….does mean that the claim is valid.
Yet another thing LSU fans have been trying to explain to the rest of you.
But nah, the SEC is suing LSU and the state because they KNOW something.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:52 am to geauxcoco
quote:
practicing his free speech rights.
Not a free speech rights issue. This is in the same regards as you aren’t allowed to badmouth your employer.
And before you say it… Yes… I’m fully aware that lane Kiffin is not employed by the SEC that was not the point. The point behind that is the relevancy.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:53 am to pankReb
Melt
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:58 am to pankReb
5 minutes ago, the OP thought LSU was suing the SEC
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:06 am to pankReb
Violated? I think using “imagine if we had pro players “ comment… a simple off the cuff comment walking away has exploded by people looking to get rid of him because he hurt their feelings.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:08 am to pankReb
quote:
Check in if you believe Lane’s 1st amendment rights were violated?
So far I’ve had 3 in one thread who believe this.
The original Lawsuit last week from the SEC was a suit against LSU violating the SEC's 1st Amendment Rights. That is what they were originally talking about in the other thread.
The lawsuit by the SEC is based on the 1st Amendment.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:09 am to pankReb
No of course not. But joking during a halftime interview isn't even worth talking about. The SEC is picking and choose what behavior bothers them based on who is saying it or doing it. Tenn coach can ask fans to throw shite at Lane. Golding can openly tamper with Clemson's roster. Not a peep from the SEC. Lane talks a little shite...... GET LSU THE F OUT THE SEC.
Anybody with a brain can see how dumb this is. Ole Miss fans is just so giddy they get to feel good about Lane being gone but that won't last.
Anybody with a brain can see how dumb this is. Ole Miss fans is just so giddy they get to feel good about Lane being gone but that won't last.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:13 am to Dotarian
quote:
You'd think that was true, but tell that to Twitter, er, X, Facebook/Meta and just about every media outlet not tied to MAGA who got sued for violating "first amendment rights" when they made editorial decisions about what content was allowed on their (non-government) platforms. While you're technically correct, in this climate it doesn't matter, and you probably couldn't find 1 person in 100 that actually understands what the 1st Amendment actually says.
Yea, the social media stuff got into a very grey area and the question was whether those platforms were public forums, but we’re well beyond the scope of that issue here.
And for the record, I don’t think the SEC’s first amendment claim has a snowball’s chance in hell either. The only state actor that has taken any action to prohibit the SEC’s right to disassociate is the state court judge, and he’s not named as a defendant in the federal suit.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:14 am to pankReb
quote:
to go on record
Ok fine I'll go on record.
You enjoy the company of other men.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:14 am to Tarpon08
Multiple LSU players have stated that Lanes 1st amendment rights were violated.
That’s because a government entity is being introduced to force something upon the SEC. I doubt anything will come of it but there’s is a hell more 1st amendment relevance to that
quote:
The lawsuit by the SEC is based on the 1st Amendment.
That’s because a government entity is being introduced to force something upon the SEC. I doubt anything will come of it but there’s is a hell more 1st amendment relevance to that
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:24 am to pankReb
As the SEC is just an association acting through its members (their words), then the actions again Kiffin for his comment to Rowe (including the lawsuit amendment specifically alleging that as the factual basis for a cause of action) would be an abuse of process by a state actor to punish speech.
So, yes.
So, yes.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:28 am to udtiger
quote:
As the SEC is just an association acting through its members (their words), then the actions again Kiffin for his comment to Rowe (including the lawsuit amendment specifically alleging that as the factual basis for a cause of action) would be an abuse of process by a state actor to punish speech. So, yes.
Not a state actor. Membership is voluntary.
So, no. Not a 1st amendment rights violation.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:29 am to pankReb
quote:
...because Twitter is a private company, not a government entity.
You do realize LSU and (I think) several of the other schools in the SEC are "State" schools which are supported by Tax Payer funds...
The case you are referencing does not apply to this situation...
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:30 am to klrstix
quote:
You do realize LSU and (I think) several of the other schools in the SEC are "State" schools which are supported by Tax Payer funds...
So LSU is violating Lane Kiffin’s 1st amendment rights?
quote:
The case you are referencing does not apply to this situation...
I’m fully aware. I’m not the one who brought that up.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 9:31 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:31 am to pankReb
quote:
That’s because a government entity is being introduced to force something upon the SEC.
Which of the defendants in the federal suit have forced the SEC to do anything?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:28 am to UpToPar
You could just read the suit for yourself. Google AI also helps.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:31 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
two players the SEC forced LSU to not include on the roster after the court told them they could.
So many errors in so short a statement....
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News