Started By
Message
re: How long do you think it will take SEC coaches to figure out how to stop A&M?
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:03 pm to LSU1NSEC
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:03 pm to LSU1NSEC
Florida is lucky to play A&M early. That arse would kicked all over the place if they play today.
LSU is built to defend this offense. It's gonna be a dogfight between the Tigers and Ags every year I think.
Saban and Smart were stupid to not put more speed on the field. Those big dudes couldn't catch up with Manziel or the receivers.
LSU is built to defend this offense. It's gonna be a dogfight between the Tigers and Ags every year I think.
Saban and Smart were stupid to not put more speed on the field. Those big dudes couldn't catch up with Manziel or the receivers.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:08 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
How long do you think it will take SEC coaches to figure out how to stop A&M?
Until the first game of 2013 and JFF loses his all-star offensive line

Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:10 pm to Porker Face
Keep hoping and praying Hogs. You are gonna get flat out destroyed at home next year.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:19 pm to Mr Sausage
Our offense will be different when Johnny leaves, no doubt. Sumlin will put together whatever best suits the players. He was the OC at OU when they had Peterson...
Also, by the time JFF is gone, we will have upgraded talent by quite a bit...DWI
Also, by the time JFF is gone, we will have upgraded talent by quite a bit...DWI
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:32 pm to townestoldme2
just wanted to put this here
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:38 pm to Maximus
What in the gay is going on there?
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:40 pm to relapse98
your offensive coordinator thinks he is a member of emblem 3
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:44 pm to King Crimson
quote:
After the 1st quarter, aTm scored 9 points on Bama's defense (the last 3 a gift from the officials). So, to answer your question, I'd say about 15 minutes.
Alabama's DEFENSE didn't stop A&M from driving the entire 1st half. A&M only had the ball for one drive in the 2Qtr but didn't convert after driving 62 yards. They did prevent drives to start the second half. 3 of 4 possessions in the first half with points and 3 of 6 drives in the 2nd half with points. Looks to me you decided to play some defense in the 2nd half, but you certainly didn't stop them.
Good thing the 1st Qtr still counts. Excluding the 2nd Qtr Alabama only scored 10 points.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:45 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
that was early in the season. LSU has done the best job.
guess what, it was early in the season for UF too and we had no previous game tape to gameplan with either, but after 30-mins of a&m having their way NOBODY has shut a&m down the way we did in the 2nd half.(65 total yds, 3 1st downs, and 0 point)
Posted on 11/11/12 at 9:49 pm to gatorsownfsu81
quote:
guess what, it was early in the season for UF too
I don't think anyone is saying UF didn't do a great job shutting them down in the second half. What they are saying is that if we played again next weekend, A&M would steamroll the gators once you consider A&M is vastly improved since then and the craptastic way UF has played the last 3 games.

Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:05 pm to USMC Gators
Florida was more effective than LSU. It might have been a different outcome if it wasn't our first game of the year. However, Florida did manage to beat us without us giving them 5 turnovers and our kicker leaving 7 points off the board
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:14 pm to BQAG02
quote:
giving them 5 turnovers
Yeah I guess LSU forced none of those

Aggies couldn't even beat us at home when our offense was playing like shite.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:15 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
Stopping A&M's offense isn't about scheme it's about skill, just like stopping Oregon's offense. LSU and Florida already showed how to do it, have really fast DE's. Manziel killed Bama by extending plays with his legs way more than the A&M scheme did. Against LSU when he tried that Sam and Kiki were right on his tail and he threw tow costly picks by trying to throw on the run under pressure. You stop him the same way you stop Tebow, make him beat you on down the field throws in the pocket
It's comments like these that just crack me up and show just how little you guys paid attention in the game. For instance, against LSU the above describes one pick by Manziel that really was more of a bad read than anything where he tried to force a throw. His other 2 picks? One hit his receiver in the chest and it bounced off. The other was a timing route with his WR who went the wrong way. That doesn't even count the multiple bad reads by Manziel in the game where he missed open receivers, chose bad running lanes, or just made bad decisions.
The UF stuff is just laughable. He didn't even make a single deep throw in that game and he was clearly confused in the 2nd half. He was as green as green could be and it showed.
The best thing that all 3 teams did to figure out the A&M O was to figure out the A&M D. In all 3 games they struggled offensively against A&M early and as the game wore on were able to score points and extend drives and thus take the ball out of JFF's hands.
LSU and UF absolutely deserve props for beating A&M but if you honestly think that was Manziel's "best shot" and he won't correct those problems you are delusional. He is getting better and better at understanding this offense and the talent continues to improve around him.
The truth is guys it doesn't matter what the offensive or defensive scheme is. Not really. What matters is the talent behind it. A&M has good front line talent right now but not good depth. That is going to change in the next couple of years and change dramatically. Once A&M has equal talent at every position plus the depth behind it that Bama, LSU, and UF have watch out. A&M plays a physical and fast offense that isn't a gimmick. It just does a lot of things well. Beyond that defense is really the key. If A&M can continue to improve defensively then the rest is academic. Spurrier's offense got the pub at UF but his defense won titles for him. Same with Meyer.
Keep on telling yourselves though that A&M's offense is a cute little toy that will be crushed by the mighty SEC defenses. It's kind of like how A&M can't compete in the SEC and it will take years before they will have a chance of beating a team like Bama. Good luck with that.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 11:32 pm to aggressor
Manziel is a special talent no doubt. He makes life difficult for any DC.
I don't see how Aggies fans are so quick to dismiss the TOs vs us. The first two possessions it was like we weren't even on the field. Afterwards, seemed like A&M never adjusted to our changes. It seemed like we forced JF to play outside his comfort zone from then on.
Manziel will continue to improve. But so will D's that oppose him. Saban is a great D coach. Saban got beat by Tebow in '08. In '09, completely different story (and it will be hard for any school to match UF's talent on O that year). IOW, as good as Manziel is, I would be cautious about expecting that success vs Bama again.
I don't see how Aggies fans are so quick to dismiss the TOs vs us. The first two possessions it was like we weren't even on the field. Afterwards, seemed like A&M never adjusted to our changes. It seemed like we forced JF to play outside his comfort zone from then on.
Manziel will continue to improve. But so will D's that oppose him. Saban is a great D coach. Saban got beat by Tebow in '08. In '09, completely different story (and it will be hard for any school to match UF's talent on O that year). IOW, as good as Manziel is, I would be cautious about expecting that success vs Bama again.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 12:56 am to AlwysATgr
If the question is if SEC Defenses will make adjustments? Sure. The thing is though the A&M system will also get better and the talent will also improve.
I think the TO's mattered for that game but not for the future. Manziel hasn't thrown a pick or had a fumble since LSU and that includes playing Bama and State. Will he remain perfect? Of course not but that isn't the question. Of the 5 TO's specifically in that game only 1 was truly Manziel's fault. You had a fumble at the end on the crazy play. Malena had a fumble (I believe his only one this year). One int hit a normally sure handed receiver in the chest and bounced. One was a timing pattern thrown to a receiver that ran the wrong route. That leaves the "bad" interception where Manziel was on the run and tried to force a throw into a tight space.
Manziel and the A&M team in general can learn from those mistakes. In fact I would say playing a mistake free game in Tuscaloosa is a pretty damn good indication of that. It's also a fair assessment to say Manziel and A&M are more likely to improve than to regress considering the youth of the team and the experience in the system. The talent A&M is bringing on also shifts the equation.
Fundamentally though A&M has a big OL and has built up depth there as well with more talent coming. The offense may seem gimmicky but A&M has some big and physical RB's and when it mattered against LSU and Bama both they were able to get the tough yards to score TD's in the red zone which is where a lot of Spread offenses struggle.
I think the TO's mattered for that game but not for the future. Manziel hasn't thrown a pick or had a fumble since LSU and that includes playing Bama and State. Will he remain perfect? Of course not but that isn't the question. Of the 5 TO's specifically in that game only 1 was truly Manziel's fault. You had a fumble at the end on the crazy play. Malena had a fumble (I believe his only one this year). One int hit a normally sure handed receiver in the chest and bounced. One was a timing pattern thrown to a receiver that ran the wrong route. That leaves the "bad" interception where Manziel was on the run and tried to force a throw into a tight space.
Manziel and the A&M team in general can learn from those mistakes. In fact I would say playing a mistake free game in Tuscaloosa is a pretty damn good indication of that. It's also a fair assessment to say Manziel and A&M are more likely to improve than to regress considering the youth of the team and the experience in the system. The talent A&M is bringing on also shifts the equation.
Fundamentally though A&M has a big OL and has built up depth there as well with more talent coming. The offense may seem gimmicky but A&M has some big and physical RB's and when it mattered against LSU and Bama both they were able to get the tough yards to score TD's in the red zone which is where a lot of Spread offenses struggle.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 1:45 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
I don't see how Aggies fans are so quick to dismiss the TOs vs us. The first two possessions it was like we weren't even on the field. Afterwards, seemed like A&M never adjusted to our changes. It seemed like we forced JF to play outside his comfort zone from then on.
I'd dismiss two. One was a perfect throw that hit our receiver in the chest, no LSU defender within 3 yards, and he popped it up like he was playing beach volleyball. If he makes that routine catch, we're on the 25 and theoretically in FG range (though I'm sure our crap kicker would have missed that one too). The other TO I'll mention was on the final play when we were doing the hook and ladder & lateral crap. You eventually jumped on the loose ball. Yay. You guys forced the other ones, though. I will say, however, that it's dumb to think that a fish can't learn from those bad mistakes and assume those will always happen when playing us (look at the decisions and throws Manziel made against Bama for an example).
Disclaimer: I'm solely talking offensive scheme here. Not trying to get into a "we shoulda won, we're better!" moral victory pissing contest. So if 1) we had a kicker worth a damn and 2) we hadn't popped that ball into the air, we would have finished with 29 points or 26 if you don't want to give us that long missed FG. Either way, that would have been the most points you've given up this season. That's not a bunch of whacky hypos. It's correcting a few minor execution errors, both of which were by fish (kicker + WR).
29 points isn't an offensive explosion, but 1) you guys are really fricking good on defense, so 29 is pretty good offensive production and 2) it should be enough to win a SEC game at home, provided the defense doesn't totally shite the bed.
Back to top
