Started By
Message
How do Mizzou and FSU compare?
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:29 pm
I am not a die hard where I have scouted FSU, so how do they compare?
Both seem to be pass oriented (which obviously is our weak point) I know about Jameis but are FSU's receivers that much better than Mizzou? Jameis a ton better than Franklin? (and no I don't think being up for the Heisman is an indicator of how much better someone is)
On the Madden scale of 0-100 how would you rate FSU and Mizzou in each of:
Pass offense
Run offense
Pass defense
Run defense
Special teams
Both seem to be pass oriented (which obviously is our weak point) I know about Jameis but are FSU's receivers that much better than Mizzou? Jameis a ton better than Franklin? (and no I don't think being up for the Heisman is an indicator of how much better someone is)
On the Madden scale of 0-100 how would you rate FSU and Mizzou in each of:
Pass offense
Run offense
Pass defense
Run defense
Special teams
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 3:30 pm
6
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:30 pm to flyAU
FSU has an NFL player at every position.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:32 pm to flyAU
ESPN tells me FSU will be the most talented and athletic team we have face 
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:33 pm to mjlsu23
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:34 pm to flyAU
I'm biased, but I don't believe their receivers are better than ours. Quite the contrary, especially when you look at the entire group.
I don't know enough about FSU to make any educated comments on the rest of your question. Not that that would stop many people on the rant.
I don't know enough about FSU to make any educated comments on the rest of your question. Not that that would stop many people on the rant.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:35 pm to semotruman
quote:
I'm biased, but I don't believe their receivers are better than ours. Quite the contrary, especially when you look at the entire group.
Their big guy is as good as LWash or DGB, but I think there's more of a gap between him and the next receivers than at Mizzou.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:37 pm to flyAU
Both beat UF with about the same stats. That counts for something.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:37 pm to the808bass
They haven't been tested once all year, ask Oklahoma, OSU, etc. what happens when you go all season untested and play an SEC team in the championship.
You guys are good, they haven't faced a running game with a pulse, and now they've got to stop the best running game in the country.
You guys are good, they haven't faced a running game with a pulse, and now they've got to stop the best running game in the country.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:38 pm to gatorrocks
quote:
Both beat UF with about the same stats. That counts for something.
Was UF playing as a defeated team? Or were they playing with a chip on their shoulder.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:41 pm to The Nino
quote:Overall they probably are. Auburn will need to get yards on first down in order to allow their hurry up to work. If they can do this, they can win. If Auburn struggles to get 5+ yards on first, they will lose. Auburn will have no answer for FSU, but I am not sure FSU will have an answer for Auburn
ESPN tells me FSU will be the most talented and athletic team we have face
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:41 pm to JB Bama
quote:
You guys are good, they haven't faced a running game with a pulse, and now they've got to stop the best running game in the country.
BC's running game is ok. And FSU struggled there.
I think FSU has more athletes to match up on defense than Mizzou did, especially at DT and in the back 7.
FSU has as good of a running game as Mizzou at first blush. Winston is an upgrade over Franklin. The receivers might be a notch below Mizzou, but it doesn't take much to get open against Auburn's secondary.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:46 pm to flyAU
quote:
defeated team
Does it matter? They played the same no matter what.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 3:49 pm to the808bass
quote:
BC's running game is ok. And FSU struggled there.
I think FSU has more athletes to match up on defense than Mizzou did, especially at DT and in the back 7.
FSU has as good of a running game as Mizzou at first blush. Winston is an upgrade over Franklin. The receivers might be a notch below Mizzou, but it doesn't take much to get open against Auburn's secondary.
Solid analysis...
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:16 pm to flyAU
Mizzou staaaaaaaaaacked
FSU fuuuuuuuuuuuucked
FSU fuuuuuuuuuuuucked
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:42 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
BC's running game is ok. And FSU struggled there.
BC's "OK" running game as in Andre Williams, Heisman finalist with 2100 yards and 17 TDs, averaging 175 ypg this season? He had 149 of BC's 200 yards total rushing that game...not sure I'd call that "stuggling" with the running game. FSU struggled early in that game but we won by 2 TDs.
quote:
The receivers might be a notch below Mizzou, but it doesn't take much to get open against Auburn's secondary.
FSU's top 3 receivers are nationally ranked 59th, 63d, and 66th. Missouri's are 80, 86th, and ? on CFB Stats and I get the "against SEC defenses argument" but I'm not sure I'd put them below Mizzou's.
FSU's D is a little bit better but the edge goes to Mizzou in the running games...also based on CFB's stats. ANd yes, I get the SOS arguments. Not taking anything away from Mizzou at all, great team. I'm a FSU homer and Bama fan so of course I think that FSU handles AU.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:49 pm to flyAU
Mizzou STAAAAAAACKED
Noles FUUUUUUUUCKED
Noles FUUUUUUUUCKED
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:49 pm to NoleTideNole
quote:
Bama fan so of course I think that FSU handles AU
ehhh?
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:50 pm to mjlsu23
quote:
FSU has an NFL player at every position.
This.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 4:54 pm to flyAU
quote:
Was UF playing as a defeated team? Or were they playing with a chip on their shoulder.
UF hates FSU and wanted to squash FSU's NC chances. UF does not hate Mizzou and played them in Oct.
FSU vs UF was at The Swamp, Mizzou v. UF was at Mizzou.
FSU won 45-7; Mizzou won 36-17.
Take it for what its worth.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News