Has the "Big Six" jumped the shark?

Does having the so-called "Big Six" around breed divisiveness within our conference? Perhaps it is time to either de-emphasize the Big Six or simply open it up to other possible members. At present, to be a member, you need:

a) at least 6 SEC division titles (note: Arkansas is currently next in line with 4);
b) at least 8 SEC titles (note: Ole Miss is currently next in line with 6);
c) at least 1 national title awarded by the major selectors (AP Poll, Coaches Poll, BCS), while representing the SEC (note: no non-Big Six school currently has any...this definition is kind of too strict, in my opinion).

I propose that a compromise around this be reached based off of a theoretical point system. In other words, if a team wins an SEC division title, they are awarded 1 point, an SEC title is 2 points, and a major-selector natty is 3 points. The compromise could be that if a team scores 20 points or more in any combination of the above, then they would still have worthy enough accomplishments to be allowed to join. For comparative purposes, under this point system, the Big Six currently ranks as follows:

88 points - Alabama (10 SEC West titles, 24 SEC titles, 10 NCs)
39 points - LSU (8 SEC West titles, 11 SEC titles, 3 NCs)
38 points - Tennessee (6 SEC East titles, 13 SEC titles, 2 NCs)
37 points - Florida (12 SEC East titles, 8 SEC titles, 3 NCs)
34 points - Georgia (7 SEC East titles, 12 SEC titles, 1 NC)
30 points - Auburn (8 SEC West titles, 8 SEC titles, 2 NCs)