Started By
Message
re: Former US Attorney on AU wiretap claims (Sticky)
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:08 pm to CFBFAN1121
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:08 pm to CFBFAN1121
Tuna may have stuff wrong, but thinking Doug Jones is the answer to your prayers is laughable.
0
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
The threshold for threads to be stickied is obviously low.
if any other poster made that about an LSU player, it would be gone in half a second. just roll with it. obviously got a lot of bitches on this website.
This post was edited on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to BMW7SERIES
quote:
when we are cleared, but I know it won't happen.
At least you know...
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Not to mention that he and Espy will have mutual interests in each of their clients to be found believable at this point.
Exactly, he can not afford for people in this state to start thinking McGregor is a piece of shite because then they will think they are all pieces of shite and his client falls into that group.
I am telling you that there are a lot of powerful people involved in what is going on at Auburn, this is not about football.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to CFBFAN1121
Why don't you man up, then, and post your feelings on the Help Board?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to CFBFAN1121
Why can't you see that a defense attorney that has a client, tied to the lawyer's client he is talking about, in a federal investigation, might be trying to say whatever he can publicly to sway public opinion towards his best interest?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:09 pm to BMW7SERIES
quote:
It just amazes me the collective butthurt of the SEC that Auburn/Cam have had a good season. I hope all these same hicks/mongos come out of the woodwork to issue AU apologies when we are cleared, but I know it won't happen. They'll just claim we paid off some judge or NCAA official. Quite typical.
And what will you do when Auburn gets punished. Again. For what, the 3rd time in 20 years?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:12 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Why can't you see that a defense attorney that has a client, tied to the lawyer's client he is talking about, in a federal investigation, might be trying to say whatever he can publicly to sway public opinion towards his best interest?
And why cant you see that people posting stuff on a bama board predicting AU's demise can be saying whatever to make it's most bitter rival look bad??
I guarantee you, you haven't questioned not one of those threads on Bama's board predicting doom and gloom.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:13 pm to DaleDenton
quote:this
Where are the facts? All I see is one man's uninformed opinion.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:15 pm to BMW7SERIES
quote:
It just amazes me the collective butthurt of the SEC that Auburn/Cam have had a good season.
I stopped reading there because it similarly amazes me that some people can't quite fathom the idea that we may not take kindly to fricking cheating.
It's got to be about your winning. It couldn't be about the possibility that you're cheating to do so. Auburn's history would NEVER allow for something so tainted as that, would it?
Clueless, self-absorbed motherfricker.
ETA: Read some more of it.
When your shite-eating fanbase apologizes for Gadsden -- a situation THEY manufactured -- I'll consider apologizing for wrongly accusing you and your precious team, if it turns out you're not guilty.
Until then, blow me.
This post was edited on 11/19/10 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:16 pm to cyde
I must have missed the part where we were convicted of cheating.
Every school gives extra benefits to their players, and that's just an absolute fact of life. The NCAA can try and monitor it, but it's always happened and always will happen.
Every school gives extra benefits to their players, and that's just an absolute fact of life. The NCAA can try and monitor it, but it's always happened and always will happen.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:18 pm to Ross
quote:
I must have missed the part where we were convicted of cheating.
I must have missed the part where I've got the responsibility of the legal system to reserve judgment until you're proven innocent or guilty.
I am not burdened by technicalities.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:18 pm to Ross
if wire taps are so guarded and sealed -- how the hell does he know what is on them or whe ntry started --every defendants lawyers assure the public that their clients are innocent --bunch of bs to me
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:20 pm to fanofatiger
quote:
if wire taps are so guarded and sealed -- how the hell does he know what is on them or whe ntry started --every defendants lawyers assure the public that their clients are innocent --bunch of bs to me
Ha, let me guess, you question this man, but you didnt question any of that in the Tuna's post
Am I right?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:20 pm to cyde
Well, you have the mentality of the casual lynch mob if you approach things otherwise.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:20 pm to Stanky Legg
Ok, so he calls the connection gumps have made between wire taps of McGregor and the Cam situation "absolutely bizzare".
Have to agree. Gumps are idiots.
Have to agree. Gumps are idiots.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:21 pm to Festus
quote:
Why don't you man up, then, and post your feelings on the Help Board?
done
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:21 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:So. . .this guy should be deemed credible, because you don't find Tuna credible?
Ha, let me guess, you question this man, but you didnt question any of that in the Tuna's post
lol, wut?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:22 pm to Ross
quote:
Well, you have the mentality of the casual lynch mob if you approach things otherwise.
No, I've got the mentality of the average member of the court of public opinion. The difference is that I'm not willing to offer any (disingenuous) apologies for it.
Bad analogy, by the way.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:23 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
At least you know...
Oh, I see what you did there. You are indeed a clever mongo aren't you.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News