Started By
Message
Drink stat just heard at Media Days
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:19 am
They said he’s never beaten an SEC team that finished over .500 and has lost 8 straight to ranked teams.
And he’s making 11m a year and a new 62m guaranteed contract???
Had no idea it was that bad. What the hell has he done to justify that contract?
And he’s making 11m a year and a new 62m guaranteed contract???
Had no idea it was that bad. What the hell has he done to justify that contract?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:22 am to dallastiger55
It’s the price of playing poker in the SEC. Given his consistency MO figures it’s worth paying little extra vs going out and attracting an unknown quantity and risk pulling an Auburn.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:23 am to dallastiger55
You have some coaches that can win big games and then lose to shitty opponents. I'd take the guy that wins the ones he's supposed to over that.
I still have nightmares over losing to fricking Memphis and Arkansas after beating the good teams on our schedule.
I still have nightmares over losing to fricking Memphis and Arkansas after beating the good teams on our schedule.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 11:24 am
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:24 am to dallastiger55
Drink is a weird mf but his teams are always competitive. He’s been way better than I would have ever thought.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:42 am to dallastiger55
quote:
he’s making 11m a year and a new 62m guaranteed contract???
You worried about spending $$$ wisely, coonass?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:43 am to ukraine_rebel
quote:
it’s worth paying little extra vs going out and attracting an unknown quantity and risk pulling an Auburn.
Is this a known quantity?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:45 am to dallastiger55
Remember when some people wanted LSU to hire him? 
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:55 am to dallastiger55
Missouri fans will agree with paying 11m for that stat as long as they can make it to a nice bowl game and talk about it, here.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:56 am to dallastiger55
He’s beaten SEC teams that finished over .500 just nobody that was over .500 on conference
So no 5-3 SEC teams
So no 5-3 SEC teams
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:58 am to BufordT
Pardon the pun but kind of comparing apples to oranges here 
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:23 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
risk pulling an Auburn.

Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:52 pm to dallastiger55
Maybe he wants to pull the rip cord on that golden parachute
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:55 pm to dallastiger55
I think his agent convinced Mizzu that UF wanted him when there really wasn't too much interest except as a fall back plan.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:58 pm to MizzouTrue
Yep he has never beat a team in the SEC that had a winning conference record that season which is crazy considering their record the past few seasons. A bad sign for ever getting them playoff bound though.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:59 pm to dallastiger55
Drink is a more steady Houston Nutt. The highs aren't as high in conference play, but they are nowhere near as low.
Drink also tends to hold serve in OOC games. Yes, he lost to Army a few years ago but that Army team could have knocked off half the SEC that season. Nothing worse than facing a red hot triple option team in the bowl season when they've had time to throw in some extra tricks.
Winning 6-9 games a season guaranteed doesn't sound too bad, especially when you have a 10+ game season thrown in the mix every now and then.
Drink also tends to hold serve in OOC games. Yes, he lost to Army a few years ago but that Army team could have knocked off half the SEC that season. Nothing worse than facing a red hot triple option team in the bowl season when they've had time to throw in some extra tricks.
Winning 6-9 games a season guaranteed doesn't sound too bad, especially when you have a 10+ game season thrown in the mix every now and then.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 1:13 pm to Arksulli
I don’t think we lost to an unranked team since like 2022
So if you don’t have a good team, he’s beating you. And Mizzou isn’t about to fire a coach that’s won 29 games in 3 seasons, they just aren’t.
So if you don’t have a good team, he’s beating you. And Mizzou isn’t about to fire a coach that’s won 29 games in 3 seasons, they just aren’t.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 1:23 pm to MizzouTrue
A steady coach is a good thing. Arkansas has had John L. Smith having a nervous breakdown, Bert getting drunk, Chad Morris as a panic hire, and a career position coach as a second panic hire.
Steady sounds damn good here at the moment.
Steady sounds damn good here at the moment.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 1:26 pm to MizzouTrue
I can't think of anything more boring than a team that always beats who they are suppose to but never beats anyone they aren't suppose to. Not that it is necessarly bad coaching, it is just boring, predictable, and being stuck in that would just seem to be a momentum killer and uninspiring for a program
At some point if a program gets stagnant, I'd rather just take the risk on hiring someone that might fall flat on their face, but also might be a diamond in the rough
Drink has mizzou right in that sweet spot, the kind of spot where if mizzou eventually fired him, everyone would know and understand why, but the media would be call out mizzou and thowi a fit because "look at his record at mizzou!"
At some point if a program gets stagnant, I'd rather just take the risk on hiring someone that might fall flat on their face, but also might be a diamond in the rough
Drink has mizzou right in that sweet spot, the kind of spot where if mizzou eventually fired him, everyone would know and understand why, but the media would be call out mizzou and thowi a fit because "look at his record at mizzou!"
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 7/20/26 at 1:30 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
So if you don’t have a good team, he’s beating you. And Mizzou isn’t about to fire a coach that’s won 29 games in 3 seasons, they just aren’t
Nor should you. Drink hasn't delivered a title, but damn, man, he's a good coach and he's been successful for you. I'd rather have that consistency than wander in the desert for a decade.
Popular
Back to top

16









