Started By
Message
re: Do you view the Auburn football program as a national power?
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:34 pm to craigbiggio
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:34 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
frick Auburn
^
This
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:39 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
I think there’s a difference between Nationally Relevant and National Power
spot on.
quote:
Relevant means you’re on the watchlist every year. Power means you’re likely or expected to deliver.
spot on again.
AU is always one of those good teams on the radar and always in the top 10-20 teams in the country. They are not always in the top 5-10 and expected to compete for a title. And they need more than 1 instance in program history of consecutive 10 win seasons to be considered a "power".
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:40 pm to CBandits82
Ole Miss national power?
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:50 pm to Luke
quote:
Ole Miss national power?

Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:51 pm to genro
quote:
Hmm. Seems like I missed something
I threw Ole Miss in there as a joke because............frick Ole Miss.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:52 pm to Ross
quote:
That means your thread is essentially a debate on what constitutes a "blue blood" or a "national power".
Lets do it.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:53 pm to CBandits82
quote:
I threw Ole Miss in there as a joke because............frick Ole Miss.
and so far it is the funniest joke of the day
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:54 pm to CBandits82
Yes. I consider the top 15ish programs all time to be powers.
Other than getting a hundred or so wins before Auburn even had a team, what is the difference between Michigan and Auburn? Michigan has like 1 national championship since WW1
Other than getting a hundred or so wins before Auburn even had a team, what is the difference between Michigan and Auburn? Michigan has like 1 national championship since WW1
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:55 pm to Ross
quote:
was including Ole Miss a trolljob or something?
I was fricking around because I hate Ole Miss, I thought most would get it
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:55 pm to CBandits82
No, not a national power. They're the next level down and that's about as good as it'll ever get for most teams. I'm not knocking them. They are light years ahead of our program.
Bama is our only national power now. Florida isn't far from being there. Maybe someday Tennessee will get back on track.
UGA, Auby, and LSU are the next level down. SCAR and Aggy are the only programs that could move up in to the level with UGA, Auby, and LSU.
The rest of us are a loooong ways away.
Bama is our only national power now. Florida isn't far from being there. Maybe someday Tennessee will get back on track.
UGA, Auby, and LSU are the next level down. SCAR and Aggy are the only programs that could move up in to the level with UGA, Auby, and LSU.
The rest of us are a loooong ways away.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:56 pm to Glorious
quote:
what is the difference between Michigan and Auburn?
the size of the fan base is the biggest difference
Posted on 6/11/18 at 1:56 pm to Glorious
quote:
Other than getting a hundred or so wins before Auburn even had a team, what is the difference between Michigan and Auburn? Michigan has like 1 national championship since WW1
This is actually a great point.
Its off topic but what the frick has Michigan done lately?
And by lately I mean since after WW2?
Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:00 pm to WG_Dawg
Our marketing slogan moving forward…
"Auburn Football: We might just whoop that arse"
"Auburn Football: We might just whoop that arse"
Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:06 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:Youve had one fricking season being relevant and suddenly youre walking through the door
UGA is walking through the door of national power status and Auburn is right behind us.

Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:07 pm to CBandits82
Auburn is as big of a name in college football in 2018 as anyone.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:12 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
Solid program. They seem to have very high highs and very low lows, but when it averages out, they are a solid program.
About sums it up. They are a national power insofar as they get a lot of discussion every year. If they are not in the mix, then they are usually fricking up someone else's run.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:15 pm to 3morereps
quote:
Auburn is as big of a name in college football in 2018 as anyone.

Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:16 pm to CBandits82
They are an occasional national power when their home schedule sets up nicely and/or they have a transfer, non-AU developed QB.
Blue blood? No, not by any measurable metric.
Blue blood? No, not by any measurable metric.
Posted on 6/11/18 at 2:17 pm to CBandits82
Lol when did Ole Miss become a blue blood.
Popular
Back to top
