Started By
Message

re: Do we, or do we not, want the 12 best teams in the Playoffs?

Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
851 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

No we do not.

Automatic bids, OVER TIME, will help other conferences recruit and improve themselves years from now.


Keeping conference champions out is what lead to the destruction of the PAC12 and is why we have the junk B12 instead of the proper one.

At this point, today, since we destroyed the P5 and now have the "P4"....we need to keep the remaining conferences alive by giving their champ an auto bid.

We just need tweeks to get this "right."

16 teams, no byes, conference champs get auto host first round (top 8 seed). Everything works itself out with that kind of model.
Posted by MAROON
Houston
Member since Jul 2012
2139 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm to
Maybe we start with a rule that if your SOS is not in the top 50 then you are ineligible for the playoffs.

That eliminates SMU, IU, Clemson, Boise State, and Notre Dame this seaon.


Or maybe if you’re undefeated your SOS is irrelevant, one loss you need to be top 75, 2 or more losses top 50.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9694 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:11 pm to
Why the frick can’t we just use the top 12 teams from the coaches poll and get rid of the committee
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
19284 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Or maybe if you’re undefeated your SOS is irrelevant, one loss you need to be top 75, 2 or more losses top 50.
I don’t think putting a sliding scale in helps. I like your top 50. Maybe even go to 65, that puts you in the top half I believe.

If you’re not in the top half SoS, schedule better.
Posted by Foy
Member since Nov 2009
3908 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I prefer the 12 most deserving teams. The reality is the 12 "best" teams can probably just be taken from the talent composite rankings to start the season. There were only 13 teams over the 50% "blue chip ratio" to start the season. No team below 50% ever won a national title since we started ranking recruits. In reality those are the 13 best teams. We don't even need games if you want to use "best" as your measure. They're the only ones with any shot.


Yes. This is what Alabama fans don’t understand. They started the Vegas odds favorite crap in 2012 or whenever it was they were begging to be in and it’s ruined their brains.
Posted by Foy
Member since Nov 2009
3908 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Why the frick can’t we just use the top 12 teams from the coaches poll and get rid of the committee


Because 18 year old GAs fill out the polls for the coaches. This is a horrible idea.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
30886 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:15 pm to
quote:



You're just pissed that alabama can't pay players and stock talent with the tacit approval of the NCAA while they went after anyone else who tried the same.



Alabama hasn't dropped off in recruiting rankings, and will remain the most talented team in college football for at least one more year after this years class.

Talent is not the issue.

We have a 3 loss season and with all the actual issues going on, you're still incapable of pulling out something correct.

It must suck being that retarded.

This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 1:16 pm
Posted by BamaRoo
Shitlingthorpe, UK
Member since Jul 2009
3772 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

No, it should just be 4 max, and it should always be based on merit. AQ is bullshite.

It should but 2 things finally ended it , SEC dominance and
bitching & moaning over it. ....and more tv revenue , despite some of the
games being pure shite shows while masquerading as the best
teams.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7298 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Do we, or do we not, want the 12 best teams in the Playoffs?
Do not want

12 teams are way too many
Posted by Jdgood1
Member since Dec 2022
245 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:20 pm to
Boys it's more football. I'll never complain about being able to watch more football.

Here in a few months we're all going to be itching for the spring games.
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
5622 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:21 pm to
They had to have this cause bama
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
2852 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

We don’t want 9-3 teams in.
We don’t want weak SOS 11-1 teams in


Agreed. This is why 12 teams sucks. You are forced to let teams in these categories in.

Keep it exclusive. Exclusivity is a good thing. Keeps it prestigious and meaningful.
Posted by gamecox10
Member since Mar 2020
288 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:31 pm to
Who was our horrible loss? All 3 losses of ours were ranked at the time of the game.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7266 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

BCS was great 4 teams was good 12 is an abomination


Agree. It doesn’t work at this level. But given the fact colleges don’t give two shits about “academics” being involved, eventually it will work because it will be state-subsidized competition to the NFL.
Posted by Saunson69
Stephen the Pirate
Member since May 2023
6577 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:33 pm to
You conveniently leave out how Bama beat Georgia probably best franchise the last 5 years in CF, beat LSU 29 on the road at night at LSU and beat Missou and SC. So yeah, those things trump the 3 losses.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7298 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Boys it's more football. I'll never complain about being able to watch more football.

You're actually still watching that garbage?
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7341 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

So yeah, those things trump the 3 losses.


They obviously didn't.

Teams who beat scrubs but lost to all their ranked opponents got in (like Texas, Indiana and SMU). Teams who lost 3 games with several of them being to scrubs (like Bama and Ole Miss) did not get in regardless of having good wins.

Posted by theballguy
Between DC and Colorado
Member since Oct 2011
19196 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:02 pm to
If Bama is one of those 12 teams, then no.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130417 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:04 pm to
Don't lose to Kentucky at home
Posted by Soonerd78
Member since Sep 2024
1650 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 2:06 pm to
Best way to make a playoff sec gets 4 big 10 gets 4, acc and big 12 get one automatic bids. Groups of 5 best team get in auto …..committee only picks 5 teams who are left ….. whoever they want ! Wouldn’t be opposed to any team who wins conference gets a bye and maybe the top 2 teams get 2 byes . Gives everyone something to play for !
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter