Started By
Message

Did we let UT in just to kick them out?
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:35 pm
Of course nobody is going to tell A&M this cause they won’t be able to keep their mouth shut but
what are the odds we’re just frickin with them and Sankey already has the votes, including OU?
what are the odds we’re just frickin with them and Sankey already has the votes, including OU?
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:37 pm to Leopold
For a board replete with posters that swear up and down that Texas will be inconsequential in the SEC, there sure are a lot of threads started about Texas by non-longhorn fans 

Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:39 pm to Matts El Rancho
So there’s one vote ‘for’
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:40 pm to Leopold
South Carolina is one million times more likely to be kicked out than Texas. 

Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:47 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
kick out south carolina
add Clemson, they offer so much more
add Clemson, they offer so much more
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:06 pm to Leopold
My preference is for Texas to be among peer institutions in the B1G. I would love it if the SEC gave Texas the boot.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:31 pm to Leopold
The plot twist is that it's Aggy getting kicked out.
With Texas coming in, you don't need fAggy anymore.
With Texas coming in, you don't need fAggy anymore.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:41 pm to Leopold
Texas thinks they're way more important than they actually are. It's quite funny to witness their delusion.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:51 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
Texas thinks they're way more important than they actually are. It's quite funny to witness their delusion.
a thread started by a SC fan about kicking out Texas turns into Texas thinking they are way more important



Posted on 6/6/23 at 5:06 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
South Carolina is one million times more likely to be kicked out than Texas.
Cocks have a much longer history with the SEC and its predecessor incarnations. You can whistle past the graveyard but Columbia is more secure than austin.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 6:44 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It is going to be enjoyable to watch UT put in their place by the true powers in the SEC.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 6:48 pm to 308
The Longhorns will be the equivalent of the Gamecocks in this conference. A middling team. South Carolina would have consistently challenged for the Big 12 title every year had they been in that conference. Muschamp would have won multiple coach of the year awards.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 7:11 pm to charliethehun
You didn’t even go to Vandy, and you white knight horn on every thread, foh shorthorn
Posted on 6/6/23 at 7:12 pm to genuineLSUtiger
That’s not true, because as you all point out over and over, the best players want to play in the best conference. South Carolina would be West Virginia because their already poor recruiting would be about 20 spots worse in the Big 12.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 7:20 pm to charliethehun
quote:
kick out south carolina
add Clemson, they offer so much more
Kick out aTm and Missouri. Don't bring in TU and OU.
Make it a real Southeastern conference. Bring in Clemson, Miami, FSU, and Georgia Tech.
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 6/6/23 at 7:35 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Agree, this is a typical type of offseason bs thread.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 9:02 pm to Leopold
UT is a founding member. So no?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 1:37 am to Leopold
quote:
what are the odds we’re just frickin with them and Sankey already has the votes, including OU?
Is this one of those band camp things or is this idiot rolling around in here with a sub 100 1Q?
Popular
Back to top
