Started By
Message
re: Dellenger: The SEC’s federal court hearing today will go on as scheduled
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:12 am to Crowknowsbest
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:12 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
There is no other viable option at the moment.
So we just roll with what we have and give power to people who’ve proven they don’t deserve it and can’t properly manage it?
Yeah, no thanks on that.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:14 am
1
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:13 am to Tuscaloosa
Barrett is as clueless as the Tennessee grandma that you have all hitched your wagons to. Kiffin has said from the beginning and throughout that he would comply with the SEC’s wishes . AND HE DID. The NCAA ruled the players eligible not Kiffin or LSU. The SEC pushed back on the NCAA ruling and Kiffin did as he had stated throughout this mess and complied with the SEC wishes. Why fault him or LSU for exploring a path for those players to play based off of the NCAA ruling? In the end LSU complied with the SJWEC.
As a bama fan what I find odd is that your school and fans have hitched your wagon to the Tennessee grandmothers wishes and guidance.
16x
Y’all must be truly terrified of Kiffin at Lsu!
As a bama fan what I find odd is that your school and fans have hitched your wagon to the Tennessee grandmothers wishes and guidance.
16x
Y’all must be truly terrified of Kiffin at Lsu!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:15 am to RB10
quote:
So we just roll with what we have and give power to people who’ve proven they don’t deserve it and can’t properly manage it?
Yes, if the alternative is giving coaches free reign to sign a bunch of 26 year old pro washouts.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:20 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
16x
Do you literally type this in every post, pretending it’s a signature?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:21 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Yes, if the alternative is giving coaches free reign to sign a bunch of 26 year old pro washouts.
The SEC is allowing NFL and NBA washouts to be rostered already.
They’re just choosing which ones they will allow and which ones they won’t. Again, selective enforcement is one of the primary reasons the NCAA has been kneecapped.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:24 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:22 am to supersaints9
quote:
Kiffin has said from the beginning and throughout that he would comply with the SEC’s wishes . AND HE DID. The NCAA ruled the players eligible not Kiffin or LSU. The SEC pushed back on the NCAA ruling and Kiffin did as he had stated throughout this mess and complied with the SEC wishes. Why fault him or LSU for exploring a path for those players to play based off of the NCAA ruling? In the end LSU complied with the SJWEC.
Thinly veiled and poorly executed attempt at plausible deniability by colluding with and enlisting the court system to fight your battle. That’s the entirety of the reason you’re currently sitting alone in the corner you’re in. Nobody’s buying it.
16x
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:23 am to Giantkiller
quote:
Do you literally type this in every post, pretending it’s a signature?
Yes.
I also manually add the bold and italics. It’s the extra effort that sets me apart.
16x
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:25 am to RB10
quote:
The SEC is allowing NFL and NBA washouts to be rostered already.
My understanding of their new rule is that this will not be allowed moving forward. Is that not correct?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:26 am to Scruffy
quote:
Its purpose is to answer the question of if the NCAA cannot enforce these rules, does the SEC and other conferences have the power to?
If we take the current LSU situation out of it, this still needs to be done. If a conference cannot regulate its members, the last vestige of college football is gone.
Sadly, I agree with you that most of it is already gone, but this is where we are.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:28 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:30 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
My understanding of their new rule is that this will not be allowed moving forward. Is that not correct?
They’re already trying to retroactively punish LSU.
So, again, it’s another issue of selective enforcement.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:31 am to Tuscaloosa
How does the Tennessee grandmothers tits taste as a Bama fan? Boy we are living in the upside down when Bama fans are guided by this nonsense.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:33 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
I didn’t even post on this entire website from January 31 to September 2.
You’ve been making up for it since then. You’re a gaping bleeding vagina. Your husband needs to limit your social media access for a bit.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:34 am to Tuscaloosa
Barrett has an incorrect recollection of events
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:34 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:35 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You’ve been making up for it since then. You’re a gaping bleeding vagina. Your husband needs to limit your social media access for a bit.
Seethe.
16x
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:36 am to RB10
quote:
They’re already trying to retroactively punish LSU. So, again, it’s another issue of selective enforcement.
No enforcement has happened at all, for one thing, but is it also not entirely possible that this was just the straw that broke the camel’s back? Forget Lane Kiffin. LSU’s basketball program is staking their entire roster construction strategy on former pros.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:38 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
No enforcement has happened at all, for one thing, but is it also not entirely possible that this was just the straw that broke the camel’s back?
Not yet. They’re begging a court to let them enforce their rules though. Only not against the teams actually breaking their rules, only the one who thought about breaking it a little more than the rest.
quote:
Forget Lane Kiffin. LSU’s basketball program is staking their entire roster construction strategy on former pros.
Most former “European pros” which the SEC has said is fine.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:41 am to RB10
quote:
Only not against the teams actually breaking their rules, only the one who thought about breaking it a little more than the rest.
Those schools just aren’t challenging them in court. There is no indication those players will be allowed an exception to the SEC’s rule. Their respective governors just aren’t publicly thumbing their nose at the conference.
Those schools voted in favor of the new rule and enforcement.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:43 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:43 am to Tuscaloosa
Every team in this league is paying millions for players.
They are ALREADY pros.
This fake outrage is fricking hilarious to watch.
They are ALREADY pros.
This fake outrage is fricking hilarious to watch.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:48 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Those schools just aren’t challenging them in court.
LSU hasnt challenged anyone in court. LSU was enjoined as a defendant by the players in their lawsuit.
quote:
There is no indication those players will be allowed an exception to the SEC’s rule.
They already have been granted an exception to their rule. What do you think TRO stands for?
I’ll go ahead and mark you down as another who believes LSU encouraged a lawsuit against itself. I’m disappointed, you seemed smarter than that.
quote:
Their respective governors just aren’t publicly thumbing their nose at the conference.
The SEC didn’t fight against restraining orders in their states. No reason for them to do anything.
quote:
Those schools voted in favor of the new rule and enforcement.
LSU voted for and abstained, and were sued for it.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:49 am
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News