Started By
Message
College football ‘Super League’ details unveiled
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:04 am
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:04 am
27
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:09 am to AulderMagee
Some cocksucker at the New York Times sure had some time on his hands.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:10 am to AulderMagee
Cut 72 in half and you’re closer to a “super league”.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:12 am to AulderMagee
Is this gay or is it just me
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:12 am to AulderMagee
Fat chance getting many of the schools to agree to that. Texas left the Big 12 for a reason. We certainly wouldn't regress back to a SWC schedule, even allowing for the "non-divisional" games.
Whoever put this together has too much time on their hands.
Whoever put this together has too much time on their hands.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:16 am to AulderMagee
Anyone else see the irony here?
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:20 am to AulderMagee
72 is waaaay too many teams. Hell, I think 32 might be more than enough.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:23 am to AulderMagee
I like the South region. Just remove Memphis’s useless arse
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:25 am to n64ra
Yup.
32 is the real number. The top 20 big dogs are not going to want to share revenue.
Half of the divisions above are shitty. The balance of quality is simply not there to do this geographically and include everyone.
I do like the Texas division though. Just Tu and A&M and that is it.
32 is the real number. The top 20 big dogs are not going to want to share revenue.
Half of the divisions above are shitty. The balance of quality is simply not there to do this geographically and include everyone.
I do like the Texas division though. Just Tu and A&M and that is it.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:26 am to AulderMagee
Soccer fans in England did an amazing job shutting this shite down
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:28 am to Aggie in TN
quote:
Half of the divisions above are shitty.
No kidding.
If all sports were equal in revenue then this would probably work, but because football drives way more revenue than anything else you have to build these conference concepts around that sport first.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:29 am to AulderMagee
UTjr and UL? Where do we sign up?
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:30 am to AulderMagee
Some of those divisions are weak as hell
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:36 am to AulderMagee
I'm in 100% with that division.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:37 am to Aggie in TN
You could probably do anywhere from 24-32…but I’ve said it before, there should be relegation and promotion just like in European soccer. That way you give everyone a chance. There should be 3 leagues with promotion/relegation.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:39 am to AulderMagee
So conferences are just going to, what? Dissolve? This seems like not even a pie-in-the-sky idea, but more like pie-in-the-most-distant-reaches-of-the-solar-system. This will never happen.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:45 am to RamJam1
quote:
You could probably do anywhere from 24-32
I think it is between 40 and 50. B1G and SEC plus a few others.
You can't get enough votes to dissolve the SEC and B1G if half of the conferences are killing themselves.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:51 am to AulderMagee
I'm a State grad and Penn State grad--I like the South region for State and really like the Mideast region for Penn State.
This post was edited on 10/2/24 at 8:52 am
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:28 am to RamJam1
quote:
You could probably do anywhere from 24-32…but I’ve said it before, there should be relegation and promotion just like in European soccer. That way you give everyone a chance. There should be 3 leagues with promotion/relegation.
32-48 teams maybe and relegate the bottom 25% each year and promote the next up into those spots. It will prevent the bottom feeders from leaching off the top programs and add new blood to the schedule each year.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:30 am to AulderMagee
Oh hell no. We just got away from all those little brothers...frick everything about that.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News