Started By
Message
re: Chizik & NCAA Cleared Academics & ESPN- Auburn: Report was "CLEARLY FLAWED"
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:05 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:05 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
And you responded to mine. 
0
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:06 pm to mwlewis
quote:
Check the lastest university rankings and you'll see that UA is improving in all areas and Auburn is falling.
I, for one, have been impressed with the academic rigor of the Sociology Department.***
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:06 pm to Crimson Legend
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:42 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
The rest of the country looks at UAT as a weak sub-par university that loves its football but is eat up with deranged lunatics and just shakes its head wondering if incest, inbreeding, and goat fricking is really against the law in Alabama.
Meanwhile the rest of the country thinks AU is in Georgia, knows it produces awesome graduates, thinks of the greatness of Bo Jackson and Cam Newton and others, and just says WOW, must be one hell of a school.
I used to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I think you actually do believe the shite you peddle.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:42 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
"The rest of the country thinks of UAT as a subpar university.........."
...............that has been ranked higher than Auburn by U.S. News and World Report the last few years. Yes, Auburn is a good school but just as I said earlier the message is being lost on the non Bama hating public. The general public doesn't see a dimes worth of difference between Auburn and Alabama academically despite the delusional fantasy Auburn fans like yourself have about Auburn being some elite "Southern Ivy League" school. Once again, Alabama is either just as good or better than Auburn academically or Alabama's superior PR department is getting their message out better than Auburn is.
...............that has been ranked higher than Auburn by U.S. News and World Report the last few years. Yes, Auburn is a good school but just as I said earlier the message is being lost on the non Bama hating public. The general public doesn't see a dimes worth of difference between Auburn and Alabama academically despite the delusional fantasy Auburn fans like yourself have about Auburn being some elite "Southern Ivy League" school. Once again, Alabama is either just as good or better than Auburn academically or Alabama's superior PR department is getting their message out better than Auburn is.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:45 pm to Govt Tide
Outside of Vanderbilt, Florida, and maybe Texas A&M, there isn't a whole Hell of a lot of difference between each SEC school. The only difference comes in evaluating the individual colleges and departments.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:50 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Outside of Vanderbilt, Florida, and maybe Texas A&M, there isn't a whole Hell of a lot of difference between each SEC school
The Mississippi schools are on a level of their own
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:51 pm to CapstoneGrad06
This has always been the case and I've never heard an Alabama fan admit differently. Most Bama grads have never tried to argue we're academically special outside of a handful of academic programs. It's typically Auburn folks that try to sell the idea that Alabama is crappier than a low tier junior college or trade school while they are in Georgia Tech or MIT's league in all the technical fields of study.
This post was edited on 4/22/13 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 4/22/13 at 8:57 pm to weagle99
quote:
Is this another Auburn thread where half the posts in the thread are Alabama fans claiming they don't care about Auburn?
Actually, I think this is another typical SECr drama thread where the participants care more about the drama that can be created than about the actual issues themselves.
I always appreciate the intellectual dishonesty though. Because we all know that just because something is posted on an Internet message board and people participate in a discussion about it that means they have a vested fricking interest in it.
This post was edited on 4/22/13 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:00 pm to cyde
quote:
Because we all know that just because something is posted on an Internet message board and people participate in a discussion about it that means they have a vested fricking interest in it.
I frickin knew it.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:12 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Tiger n Miami AU83
Chizik & NCAA Cleared Academics & ESPN- Auburn: Report was "CLEARLY FLAWED"
quote:
The rest of the country looks at Auburn as Alabama's red-headed stepchild
The rest of the country looks at UAT as a weak sub-par university that loves its football but is eat up with deranged lunatics and just shakes its head wondering if incest, inbreeding, and goat fricking is really against the law in Alabama.
Would that be the same "rest of the country" that is convinced that Auburn's football program is dirty?
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:12 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
How do you not sue the joe schads, roopstigos, and blabbing ex players when they slandered the univ.
In other words,
Why didn't muschamp personally deny the allegation and begin the legal process against them?
It's because he didn't want to testify under oath.
In other words,
Why didn't muschamp personally deny the allegation and begin the legal process against them?
It's because he didn't want to testify under oath.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:13 pm to allin2010
So what are you trying to say?
Auburn doesn't cheat and any former players and coaches that say they do are liars?
or...
if the shite don't stick you must acquit?
Auburn doesn't cheat and any former players and coaches that say they do are liars?
or...
if the shite don't stick you must acquit?
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:13 pm to MagicCityBlazer
quote:
MagicCityBlazer
Chizik & NCAA Cleared Academics & ESPN- Auburn: Report was "CLEARLY FLAWED"
How do you not sue the joe schads, roopstigos, and blabbing ex players when they slandered the univ.
In other words,
Why didn't muschamp personally deny the allegation and begin the legal process against them?
It's because he didn't want to testify under oath.
Absolutely. Because she accused him of unprofessional conduct, Muschamp wouldn't have to prove any intent to be malicious.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:16 pm to LOYALBAMA
quote:
LOYALBAMA
Auburn doesn't want Chizik, Muschamp, or anyone under oath because the truth isn't what auburn was after.
They didn't Sue because they didn't want the spotlight on their skeletons in the closet.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:19 pm to MagicCityBlazer
Did the duke lacrosse people sue Roberts?
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:24 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Did the duke lacrosse people sue Roberts?
The Duke lacrosse players were staring at jailtime from an incompetent District Attorney.
The facts came out in the case, the DA was reprimanded(!), and they don't need public perception the way a coach does.
Auburn is an institution with lawyers who were told to sit on their hands because they didnt want to clear their name.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:26 pm to MagicCityBlazer
This post was edited on 4/22/13 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:28 pm to weagle99
quote:
weagle99
Nice gif,
Please counter my argument.
Or admit you can't explain auburns behavior.
Posted on 4/22/13 at 9:28 pm to MagicCityBlazer
Auburn doesn't have any skeletons when it comes to NCAA related dirty secrets. They are the only invertebrates in the college football world.
Page 9 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News