Started By
Message
re: Chizik & NCAA Cleared Academics & ESPN- Auburn: Report was "CLEARLY FLAWED"
Posted on 4/24/13 at 7:51 pm to AA7
Posted on 4/24/13 at 7:51 pm to AA7
quote:precisely. that's why non-auburn fans have been scratching their heads at how neither the sec nor the ncaa found anything
we are getting away with murder
Posted on 4/24/13 at 8:02 pm to bfniii
quote:
oh, none. this was all made up by auburn haters. you know perfectly well what money
So..... The answer to my question?
quote:
precisely because of how things played out. they rolled the dice and won. sec gets another ring. shouldn't be too hard to figure out.
Wait do really think they did not interview cam
quote:
obviously, they didn't.
Confirmed. You are an idiot.
quote:
if the sec publicly acknowledges that cam is on record saying one thing or the other about pops soliciting him, cam can't act ignorant any more. if a school comes within 100 yards of pops, cam can be declared ineligible or even banned from the sec and the school involved could get some reprimand.
Good stuff. You guys really are great for a good laugh
quote:
when msu notifies the sec office and nothing happens, pretty much
quote:
explain why emmert said the rules of amateurism were broken? explain why emmert kept talking about a loophole? that is the job the ncaa didn't do. they hid behind the loophole so they didn't have any pressure on themselves to actually do anything.
Yes please do. I'd like to see your NCAA knowledge here and how it pertains to the known facts, not your interpretations or beliefs
quote:
what's humorous is the handful of auburn fans who really believe the fb program is innocent because they weren't found of "wrongdoing."
What I find humorous is you think you have it all figured out despite having distorted and twisted the facts to suit your preconceived verdict on the matter.
Could he have been paid? Sure. Is it the only possibility?absolutely not. According to the known facts and rules in place, was he treated fairly and correctly? Yup.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 6:00 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:so your response is basically devoid of anything substantive. that's all you had to say.
NYCAuburn
quote:my interpretation has nothing to do with what emmert said in public. #1 rules broken. #2 loophole.
I'd like to see your NCAA knowledge here and how it pertains to the known facts, not your interpretations or beliefs
quote:no, we don't have it figured out. we're puzzled. we can't understand how something so blatant ended up in nothing. teams have gotten busted for MUCH, MUCH less.
you think you have it all figured out
quote:point out where.
distorted and twisted the facts
quote:hilarious. yes, everybody decided before the season that auburn was guilty of buying a player and then VOILA, cam shows up.
preconceived verdict
quote:speaking of distorted.
According to the known facts and rules in place, was he treated fairly and correctly? Yup.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 6:48 pm to bfniii
quote:
so your response is basically devoid of anything substantive. that's all you had to say.
I love these responses, you bypass and refuse to answer a question and when I ask you a second time, you do it yet again
quote:
my interpretation has nothing to do with what emmert said in public. #1 rules broken. #2 loophole.
So he broke a rule and was reinstated like many do every year?
It against the rules to do something that falls within a loophole?
quote:
point out where.
First of all your belief that the NCAA did not interview him and you thinking he was paid as absolute fact. We could start there.
quote:
hilarious. yes, everybody decided before the season that auburn was guilty of buying a player and then VOILA, cam shows up.
You really are pretty dense aren't you? Your preconceived verdict is you "know" he was paid, so you find a way to support your opinion.
quote:
speaking of distorted
Okay please do to tell how I am wrong. I might still have some popkern.
This thread has been great, not nearly as antlergate, but good.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 6:53 pm to NYCAuburn
[quote] So he broke a rule and was reinstated like many do every year?
The rule he broke took place before the season, so everything that happened before he was reinstated should be vacated.
The rule he broke took place before the season, so everything that happened before he was reinstated should be vacated.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 6:57 pm to BIG DADDY 73
quote:
The rule he broke took place before the season, so everything that happened before he was reinstated should be vacated.
Sorry, you would be wrong.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:10 pm to BIG DADDY 73
quote:
BIG DADDY 73
quote:
[quote] So he broke a rule and was reinstated like many do every year?
The rule he broke took place before the season, so everything that happened before he was reinstated should be vacated.
Our NCAA official in Roanoke has spoken. Must be true.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:12 pm to bfniii
quote:
#1 rules broken. #2 loophole.
How the hell do you break a loophole?
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:12 pm to BrerTiger
how the hell is this thread still going?
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:14 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
how the hell is this thread still going?
I think ATPB proved once and for all that Aubsession is always under the surface ready to erupt at a moment's notice.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:15 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
Our NCAA official in Roanoke has spoken
This is correct. Yall are lucky I like you.
Popular
Back to top

0







