Started By
Message

re: Auburn vs Georgia moving earlier in season starting in 2020

Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by JackTraven
Maryland
Member since Aug 2016
5584 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

3 UGA's AD isn't acting alone in this negotiation, he HAD to consult his head football coach before he went to the negotiating table. Kirby & McGarrity are obviously ok with his.


There has to be angle here otherwise this doesn’t make sense.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Show the two week schedule for Bama and AU leading up to the IB.



Bama does the same. They even rescheduled GSU to a thursday in order to get more time for Auburn one year
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28289 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

They also wanted to move to the East to escape Bama,


we would still play bama every year. We would also get to resume our UF/UT rivalries, who are far more natural rivals than LSU/A&M. bama won't let it happen because they would lose the UT game.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30244 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

we would still play bama every year. We would also get to resume our UF/UT rivalries, who are far more natural rivals than LSU/A&M. bama won't let it happen because they would lose the UT game.

Well nowwwww, I'd have to think UT doesn't want it, UGA, Vandy, UK, SoCarl probably don't want y'all in the East and why the hell would Mizzou want to move West to take on LSU/Bama/aTm when they've done better than average in the East?
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30244 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Show the two week schedule for Bama and AU leading up to the IB.

Bama
'09 MSU-UTChatt-AU
'10 MSU-GaSt-AU
'11 MSU-GaSo-AU
'12 aTm-WCarl-AU
'13 MSU-Chatt-AU
'14 MSU-WCarl-AU
'15 MSU-CharlSo-AU
'16 MSU-Chatt-AU
'17 MSU-Mercer-AU
'18 MSU-Citdel-AU

Auburn
'09 UGA-BYE-UA
'10 UGA-BYE-UA
'11 UGA-Samf-UA
'12 UGA-AlaTm-UA
'13 UGA-BYE-UA
'14 UGA-Samf-UA
'15 UGA-Idaho-UA
'16 UGA-AlaTm-UA
'17 UGA-ULM-UA
'18 UGA-Liberty-UA
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28289 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I'd have to think UT doesn't want it,


why would you think that?


quote:

and why the hell would Mizzou want to move West to take on LSU/Bama/aTm when they've done better than average in the East?


They haven't been in the Conf. long enough to have any rivals. Seriously, tell me who Mizzou's rival is?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Well nowwwww, I'd have to think UT doesn't want it, UGA, Vandy, UK, SoCarl probably don't want y'all in the East and why the hell would Mizzou want to move West to take on LSU/Bama/aTm when they've done better than average in the East?


in the 2012 expansion they almost moved Auburn to the east and placed miz in the west. I want to say the vote came down to a one school separation between allowing it vs not. I forget if those were majority or the 2/3, 3/4 votes
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30244 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

I'd have to think UT doesn't want it,
quote:

why would you think that?

You think UT wants to lose TSIO rivalry?

And Mizzou has done ok in the East winning the East Championship twice. Why would they want to voluntarily move to the West and make their path to the SECCG basically non-existent?
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30244 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

in the 2012 expansion they almost moved Auburn to the east and placed miz in the west. I want to say the vote came down to a one school separation between allowing it vs not. I forget if those were majority or the 2/3, 3/4 votes

They should take it to a vote in the meetings in May. Greene is on a roll right now, he's got the balls and the brains to strike while the iron is HOT.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

They should take it to a vote in the meetings in May.


It wont happen at this point with more teams in the vote now. There will be another realignment in the CFB world in the next 10-15 years that will change the SEC.
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

The TV dollars and SEC TV contracts won't change because of this switch.Do you not realize this?




Stop thinking about it so linear. New contracts will be based on the data achieved in the coming years. uga is ok with this because they are forward thinking and see the potential of keeping Auburn on the schedule and creating a potential November SEC East battle most seasons. It's good for the bottom line in the conference and it will be good for uga when it comes to exposure going forward.

Auburn will fix a schedule issue that no other member institution has to put up with and it has nothing to do with wins and loses. It is absolutely about the bottom line and even season Novembers being ridiculously finically imbalanced compared to member institutions.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 2:58 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27300 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Stop thinking about it so linear. New contracts will be based on the data achieved in the coming years.



Stop spinning yourself in to the ground.Switching one game in the schedule will have no bearing in a multi year/multi millions TV negotiation.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7302 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 2:59 pm to
KEEP IT IN NOVEMBER!!!
Just like we play the Swamp Rats @ Halloween!
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Stop spinning yourself in to the ground.Switching one game in the schedule will have no bearing in a multi year/multi millions TV negotiation.


Where there is no vision the people will perish. Enjoy your perspective. It's obvious you understand it better than the leadership at your school including your AD and Head Football coach, the leadership at member institutions, including bama who would stop it if there wasn't benefit to them and the leadership of the SEC who mostly care about wins and loses...the SEC leaders have never been about money.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

All cross division games should be played in September or October. This keeps us from playing UGA, Bama, UGA which happened last year in a 4 week span....


The SEC title game has been played since 1992 and the 2018 season was literally the first time this ever happened. Auburn just like Bama gets basically a bye the week before the Iron Bowl. I hope they just switch the date with your LSU game. That would serve your dumbass program right for being a whiny arse bitch. Plus it would piss off LSU because they would have to play Auburn the week after Bama.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 3:01 pm
Posted by chillmonster
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2018
5072 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:02 pm to
I'm trying to figure out the benefit to UGA. I just don't see the reasoning.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 3:07 pm
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30244 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Stop thinking about it so linear. New contracts will be based on the data achieved in the coming years. uga is ok with this because they are forward thinking and see the potential of keeping Auburn on the schedule and creating a potential November SEC East battle most seasons. It's good for the bottom line in the conference and it will be good for uga when it comes to exposure going forward.

Auburn will fix a schedule issue that no other member institution has to put up with and it has nothing to do with wins and loses. It is absolutely about the bottom line and even season Novembers being ridiculously finically imbalanced compared to member institutions.
I think you're the first person to even mention this as a financial advantage for AU/UGA.

Your people have seemed to push the competitive disadvantage AU has had to endure with the scheduling, but never the financial strain it has caused.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 3:06 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27300 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Auburn will fix a schedule issue that no other member institution has to put up


What?Our odd year home schedules are horrible including Novembers.

So fix the Bama/UGA same year dilemma and be done with it

quote:

nothing to do with wins and loses.


You really believe that?
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28289 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

There will be another realignment in the CFB world in the next 10-15 years that will change the SEC.


I totally agree. This is when Auburn will be moved to the East.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27300 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

but never the financial strain it has caused.



How come they had more revenue in '18 than '17?
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter