Started By
Message
re: Are you for or against Texas eventually becoming an SEC member?
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:17 am to mizzoukills
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:17 am to mizzoukills
against. One Texas sized ego is already enough
0
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to mizzoukills
If Texas were on fire I wouldn't let Bert's copious amounts of sweat put out the fire.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to mizzoukills
Hell no. We left he Bevo12 to get away from that crap show down in tejus. They will spoil and undermine any conference they go to. Hell no. The Bevo12 is about to implode anyways. Leave'm an let'm rot.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to mizzoukills
You are texas obsessed, but we already have that market with ATM.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:21 am to kywildcatfanone
Go get Va Tech and NC State
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:21 am to kywildcatfanone
I would take them just for the Aggie melt and out of hopes the Aggies would run from them again to another conference.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:27 am to easy money
They would be a great addition if they could ever learn to play nice with others. They would have to give up the LHN and share 3rd tier rights and that is probably never going to happen.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:53 am to mizzoukills
For.
Personally I feel the SEC should kick out Missouri and Kentucky then add Texas, Oklahoma, Virginia, and either Duke or North Carolina.
Personally I feel the SEC should kick out Missouri and Kentucky then add Texas, Oklahoma, Virginia, and either Duke or North Carolina.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:01 am to mizzoukills
Against. frick them and their cancerous fan base/admin
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:05 am to TRUERockyTop
absolutely against...let them go down with that stupid longhorn network....
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:15 am to mizzoukills
The question implies that Texas would accept an invite. A lot of folks here really don't get it. The SEC is far too strong for Texas to manipulate, which Texas fans will twist into "their academics are sub-par".
Even if the entitled attitude changes (it won't) and they would accept an invite, there's no way A&M, Mizzou, or Arkansas would ever vote for it. And because of reciprocity, I'd guess South Carolina and Florida would also vote "no".
Even if the entitled attitude changes (it won't) and they would accept an invite, there's no way A&M, Mizzou, or Arkansas would ever vote for it. And because of reciprocity, I'd guess South Carolina and Florida would also vote "no".
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:16 am to mizzoukills
Nope
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:17 am to mizzoukills
Never, never, never
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:17 am to mizzoukills
not gonna happen...
Mizzou
Aggie
Arky
all vote "block"
LSU maybe too..
not gonna happen, don't worry about it.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:22 am to cokebottleag
quote:
Against. Stupid addition. Whoever takes texas into their conference after they destroyed their last 2 conferences is a fool.
Agreed but it would be funny seeing TX kiss everybody's arse when they first came over to the SEC though
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:27 am to Wtodd
What would be funny would be the attempt to move the conference offices and all championship games to Dallas.
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 11:28 am
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:28 am to mizzoukills
quote:
Are you for or against Texas eventually becoming an SEC member?
t.u. won't become a member of any conference that they don't absolutely control. And that's a good thing for the SEC.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:37 am to EST
quote:
Against. And throw out Texas A&M.
Good... Good...
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:41 am to AU86
quote:Both crappy programs. UNC is the team we want if we expand again
Go get Va Tech and NC State
Posted on 12/30/14 at 11:41 am to mizzoukills
Against.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News