Started By
Message
2
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Will lead to further corruption and destroy the game
Agree wholeheartedly
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:47 pm to jimdog
quote:
So the recruiting process will be never ending and coaches will only be able to coach 'em up @ their own risk. And or discipline them. Signing day won't be as big a deal.
I disagree. I think the vast majority of players like their present team. sure, some are discontented but they can transfer now; the new rule just prevents the coach from limited where they can go. no matter which way you slice it, sitting out a year is a deterrent from leaving. I think you'll see more movement down to lower level schools from guys that realize they are not good enough to get much playing time at their present schools.
quote:
Expect all schools to get inventive in how they target guys off other rosters. Also the schools I suppose can now grant scholarships on a year by year basis. Otherwise signing a grant is meaningless if they are free to go @ anytime
exactly what does getting "inventive" mean. I don't see the coaches spending tons of time trying to steal players that have to sit out a year.
quote:
And now player development will probably take a back seat
that would be stupid. you win with talent and a well coached team. these coaches better coach as best they can or they will get canned.
quote:
Might even make the game "whiter" and favor schools like Wisky and Iowa of the big Ten and even the academic institutions. Where guys go to be actual students and stick to their academic route.
this is one stupid comment and racist, imo. some of the dumbest explayers I've known have a degree from Vanderbilt. having players go from one school to the next doesn't result in a net loss or gain of any one race.
quote:
Under stand I know little of the actual details
I finally agree with you. you admit your ignorance of the topic yet still pontificate it's ramifications. I hope you aren't old enough to vote.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 5:57 pm to Paul B Ammer
As soon as this negatively impacts Alabama, watch out. Especially if one or two kids transfer to Auburn or LSU. shite will hit the fan then.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:23 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
As soon as this negatively impacts Alabama, watch out. Especially if one or two kids transfer to Auburn or LSU. shite will hit the fan then.
Keep wishing and by the way it has already happened to UA.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:33 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
If coaches weren't so vindictive when placing restrictions on transfers, a rule like this wouldn't be needed.
Yes ....not mentioning any names!
If indeed a player still has to sit one year...this is all about nothing.
The four game redshirt rule is the key factor.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:36 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
As soon as this negatively impacts Alabama, watch out. Especially if one or two kids transfer to Auburn or LSU. shite will hit the fan then.
This guy knows whats up. Bama runs this shite.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:51 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Yes... not mentioning any names
Every coach limits the destinations of a transfer leaving the program. If a transfer had a legitimate reason (e.g. health of family member) he could get a waiver from the conference office. Trying to imply that this is some sort of anti-Saban rule is ignorant and facile.
All this rule does is encourage 17-21 year olds to quit and further a participation trophy mentality. I can tell you a in favor of those things because of your "5 stars sitting on the bench" comment.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:56 pm to Paul B Ammer
WTF is wrong with you?
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:58 pm to Rohan Gravy
This is bullsh*t. Coaches will find ways to tamper with players at other schools thru third parties. It will cause a level of chaos all over college football and empower players to legally politic and convince other players to transfer to other programs.
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 6:59 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
If indeed a player still has to sit one year...this is all about nothing. The four game redshirt rule is the key factor.
Do you even read?
You are the definition of insecureU
This post was for Paul dick bammer
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:01 pm to GetCocky11
quote:You're an idiot.
If coaches weren't so vindictive when placing restrictions on transfers, a rule like this wouldn't be needed.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:03 pm to thunderbird1100
Until colleges offer multiple year scholarships, this ruling makes sense
So the school can cut ties after 1 year but the player can’t?
So the school can cut ties after 1 year but the player can’t?
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:08 pm to TrendingRight
quote:
This is bullsh*t. Coaches will find ways to tamper with players at other schools thru third parties. It will cause a level of chaos all over college football and empower players to legally politic and convince other players to transfer to other programs.
Ok....and they can do that now...
Are you concerned as a Bama fan or a college football fan.
If I’m grasping these rules correctly, I believe it’s no big deal.
I repeat...the four game redshirt rule should negate any issues.
The last few years several players transferred from LSU to other schools.
Also several players transferred to LSU.
It’s a good thing.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:08 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
quote:
So the recruiting process will be never ending and coaches will only be able to coach 'em up @ their own risk. And or discipline them. Signing day won't be as big a deal.
I disagree. I think the vast majority of players like their present team. sure, some are discontented but they can transfer now; the new rule just prevents the coach from limited where they can go. no matter which way you slice it, sitting out a year is a deterrent from leaving. I think you'll see more movement down to lower level schools from guys that realize they are not good enough to get much playing time at their present schools.
quote:
Expect all schools to get inventive in how they target guys off other rosters. Also the schools I suppose can now grant scholarships on a year by year basis. Otherwise signing a grant is meaningless if they are free to go @ anytime
exactly what does getting "inventive" mean. I don't see the coaches spending tons of time trying to steal players that have to sit out a year.
quote:
And now player development will probably take a back seat
that would be stupid. you win with talent and a well coached team. these coaches better coach as best they can or they will get canned.
quote:
Might even make the game "whiter" and favor schools like Wisky and Iowa of the big Ten and even the academic institutions. Where guys go to be actual students and stick to their academic route.
this is one stupid comment and racist, imo. some of the dumbest explayers I've known have a degree from Vanderbilt. having players go from one school to the next doesn't result in a net loss or gain of any one race.
quote:
Under stand I know little of the actual details
I finally agree with you. you admit your ignorance of the topic yet still pontificate it's ramifications. I hope you aren't old enough to vote.
You should think before you post. This rule is a DISASTER for college football and your post is so full of ignorance you should be banned for posting it.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:11 pm to TrendingRight
quote:This rule finally makes it fair for the athletes
You should think before you post. This rule is a DISASTER for college football and your post is so full of ignorance you should be banned for posting it.
It was ridiculous that the school can cut a player year by year but a player couldn’t leave without penalty
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:12 pm to TrendingRight
InsecureU is rearing it’s ugly head! :)
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:12 pm to TrendingRight
quote:
quote:
If coaches weren't so vindictive when placing restrictions on transfers, a rule like this wouldn't be needed.
quote:
You're an idiot.
:-(
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:12 pm to TrendingRight
This ridiculous rule now empowers athletes to control college football rosters. This will cause more NCAA violations than any other NCAA rule. Tampering will be EVERYWHERE!
Posted on 6/13/18 at 7:14 pm to TrendingRight
quote:How do you not think this rule makes complete sense?
This ridiculous rule now empowers athletes to control college football rosters. This will cause more NCAA violations than any other NCAA rule. Tampering will be EVERYWHERE!
You think it makes sense to have a completely one sided contract?
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News