LSU's defense isn't really ranked 29th

Is this a melt? This seems like a melt.

Passive aggressive beta. Get over it.

I agree with all of this, well said

quote:

---

Clemson's defense is ranked so highly because they don't play anyone. LSU's is ranked so pitifully and shamefully low because they play in the SEC.

---

Yes

quote:

---

LSU's defense is actually better than Clemson's defense

---

Closer than most think

quote:

---

probably the best defensive team in the country.

---

I don’t think so

quote:

---

So, in true reality, LSU has the best offense and defense in the nation, while Clemson has likely the worst offense in the nation and probably the worst defense in the nation.

Clemson will be lucky to cross the 50 yard line while LSU is going to score about 80.

---

I agree with some of what you said.
LSU is the #1 Offense in the country and could have hung 80 points multiple times this year, but took the foot of the gas in the 2nd half.

Clemson is not a juggernaut offense as Ohio St showed and their defense isn't as good either.

If Ohio St had a smarter QB they would have roasted Clemson when they sold out on the blitz. Burrow will eat that blitz alive. If they choose to stay back in coverage he will eat them alive given time. Point being Burrow will not be stopped.

CLemson will get points because they will get the ball about every 3-4 minutes when LSU kicks off. It just comes with the territory of scoring a lot.

Trevor Lawrence and that Etienne guy (sorry dont know how its spelled) will hook up with short passes.

The big difference in the two is that Clemson will need 8-12 plays to get down field. LSU does it in 3-6. The room for error is on LSU's side.

Until the 4th Quarter of the OU game, Burrow threw a touchdown every 3rd pass completion on average. We only had around 11 3rd downs and punted 1 time.

Georgia, Florida, Alabama, OU all experienced the same thing from LSU's offense. The outliner game for LSU was Auburn.

Clemson's outliner game was UNC.

Clemson finally provides us a challenge and dominates. Real tigers win 89 to LSU's 3.

You included the word "alpha" in your name. That really tells me all I need to know about you

In the last three games of the season, Clemson's defense gave up an average 359 yards a game in total offense. While LSU's defense gave up an average of 259 yards per game in total offense.

Meanwhile, LSU also played a harder schedule in those three games relative to the schedule Clemson played in those final three games as well.

Not to mention that Clemson's offense, in my opinion, is overstated simply due to the piss poor quality of teams Clemson played in the weak and pathetic ACC.

While LSU, on the other hand, which so far this season has already played and beaten six teams that were ranked in the AP top ten at the time the game was played, is ranked as the number one offense in the country.

Indeed, in my opinion, LSU's offense is a lot better than Clemson's offense simply due to the huge disparity in the quality of the competition Clemson faced relative to the quality of the competition LSU faced.

Now comparing our two games to our only common opponent, which is Texas A&M, Clemson beat them 24 to 10 and held them to 289 yards of total offense while gaining 389 yards of total offense on A&M.

While, LSU, on the other hand, beat A&M 50 to 7 and held them to just 169 yards of total offense while gaining 553 yards of total offense on A&M.

Hence, if LSU loses this game to Clemson, it won't be because Clemson is the better of the two football teams. It will be because LSU simply self-destructed and in which I don't see happening. As I think LSU will win this game relatively easy.

So, just any random thought that appears in your brain, is it?

Is 29th bad?