Started By
Message

Are you for or against Texas eventually becoming an SEC member?

Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:52 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:52 am
Me? Against. Texas is the destroyer of worlds.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111802 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:53 am to
texas-sessed
Posted by CrimsonChin
the gutter.
Member since Feb 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:53 am to
No thanks.
Posted by geauxnavybeatbama
Member since Jul 2013
25134 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:54 am to
I'm for it. It would drive A&M and eventually Bama crazy.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:54 am to
Against. Stupid addition. Whoever takes texas into their conference after they destroyed their last 2 conferences is a fool.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:55 am to
No

Texas is a huge brand, BUT the LHN is a non starter and a huge chunk of their value is negated having aTm.

Not too mention, they have gutted two conferences already.
Posted by sstig
Houston
Member since Oct 2003
2780 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:56 am to
Think bama fans with all their teeth and a scarf
around their necks. Some of the most delusional fans on the planet.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11374 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:57 am to
Add Texas, Oklahoma, and Mizzou to West and Alabama and Auburn to East.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44193 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:58 am to
For.
They're amazing folks.
The SEC would love 'em.
Posted by TwelfthMan
Member since Oct 2012
694 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:59 am to
Against. It would so bad it would feel like you were reading a thread started by mizzoukills.
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 10:02 am
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:01 am to
I'm for getting rid of a few teams in the current SEC. Not adding any.
Posted by DarrionFrmArk
Member since Dec 2014
1187 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:10 am to
Why we don't need them.... And if we add them we have to add another team too.
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
17875 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:13 am to
Against. And throw out Texas A&M.
Posted by BammerDelendaEst
Member since Jan 2014
2212 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:13 am to
We already have one bunch of pompous, self-important, psychotic blowhards (talking about you, bammers); why invite another?

Seriously, the SEC is too big and unwieldy as it is. At some point, the NCAA or ESPN or whoever runs CFB needs to standardize the conferences.
Posted by higgs_boson
State College, PA
Member since Sep 2014
22456 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:14 am to
Against. They are too big for their own britches.
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37301 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:15 am to
I'd take Texas if it meant never having to read another post by you or any of your alters, Kills.
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6233 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:17 am to
against. One Texas sized ego is already enough
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19324 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to
If Texas were on fire I wouldn't let Bert's copious amounts of sweat put out the fire.

Posted by jafo
Northwest Missouri State Bearcats
Member since Jan 2012
2954 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to
Hell no. We left he Bevo12 to get away from that crap show down in tejus. They will spoil and undermine any conference they go to. Hell no. The Bevo12 is about to implode anyways. Leave'm an let'm rot.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
120030 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:18 am to
You are texas obsessed, but we already have that market with ATM.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter