Started By
Message
re: Why OU/Texas MUST join the SEC
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:34 pm to bamaoldtimer
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:34 pm to bamaoldtimer
quote:
Aggie has an unfair advantage over every other SEC school by being the only Sec school in one of the most populous and football craved states.
Last I checked, Florida is one of the top three states for high school football.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:35 pm to Mars United
Exactly.
OP is pissing down both legs like a little bitch
OP is pissing down both legs like a little bitch
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:36 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
OP is pissing down both legs like a little bitch
I'd like to see your level of incontinence when you are an old timer.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:37 pm to HempHead
You likely would not like to see that
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:37 pm to bamaoldtimer
Would be great because then you could move Bama and Auburn to the east. Keep all rivalries in tact and the divisions would be evened out.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:37 pm to bamaoldtimer
The state of Florida has better (and more) football players than the state of Texas. UF is the only SEC school in the state.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:42 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
The state of Florida has better (and more) football players than the state of Texas.
That's debatable.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:44 pm to Mars United
quote:
Which Sumlin would trade for Jamal Adams in a heartbeat
Aggies wanting to trade Myles Garrett for anybody on the LSU team? I smell dope smoke.
This post was edited on 8/30/14 at 12:25 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:48 pm to Mars United
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:50 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
Absolutely. I don't think that there's a DL in the country that Sumlin would trade for Myles Garrett. Had a pretty good showing last night for a kid that was still in high school 90 days ago. Give him a year or two with Black Death and he'll be blowing up QBs all over the conference. Book that shite!
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:54 pm to bamaoldtimer
If someone were willing to pay you to have cancer, would you do it? That's what you get with t.u. TAMU and Arky know the deal with those clowns. Please listen to us. They are a cancer on any conference.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:54 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
We also have 8 million more people than Florida so that drags our per capita numbers down. We are also the 2nd fastest growing state in the country which should drag our numbers down even more.
This post was edited on 8/30/14 at 12:00 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:56 pm to Mars United
quote:
8 million more people than Florida does that drags our per capita numbers down
I don't think you understand how 'per capita' works.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:58 pm to bamaoldtimer
quote:
It is becoming alarmingly clear to many old SEC fans, me being one, that Texas A&M cannot continue to have the entire southwest for their bidding.
This man is petrified
Posted on 8/30/14 at 12:03 am to bamaoldtimer
You sound scared, which is kinda weird for a fan of the team that has won so many recent national championships.
You really don't want Texas. At all. Even if you think you do. And I'm not sure what the criteria is for accepting a new member - does it have to be unanimous or some percentage of the existing members? I guarantee A&M, Arkansas, and Missouri would all vote against Texas. And the scuttlebutt is (but it is only scuttlebutt) that there is an unwritten agreement among schools with in-state rivals that they'll always vote with their brethren with in-state rivals. Which if true would mean Florida and South Carolina would also vote against Texas. And then you have the whole LHN deal, which those arrogant dumbasses still believe is an excellent deal. You're not going to talk them out of that.
Oklahoma would worry Aggies and Arkansas. Mostly Aggies, because since the move we're killing them in recruiting and keeping Texas kids at home, as it should be. I can easily see them being accepted before Texas, though they make even less sense for the "Southeastern" conference. The problem you have for them is they are absolutely tied to Oklahoma State by T.Boone's money and by the Oklahoma gov't. And nobody has mentioned Oklahoma State and won't because of their inferior academics.
Look east, if you must expand. NC and VA. Don't expand simply because you're a pussy and afraid of what A&M might become some day.
You really don't want Texas. At all. Even if you think you do. And I'm not sure what the criteria is for accepting a new member - does it have to be unanimous or some percentage of the existing members? I guarantee A&M, Arkansas, and Missouri would all vote against Texas. And the scuttlebutt is (but it is only scuttlebutt) that there is an unwritten agreement among schools with in-state rivals that they'll always vote with their brethren with in-state rivals. Which if true would mean Florida and South Carolina would also vote against Texas. And then you have the whole LHN deal, which those arrogant dumbasses still believe is an excellent deal. You're not going to talk them out of that.
Oklahoma would worry Aggies and Arkansas. Mostly Aggies, because since the move we're killing them in recruiting and keeping Texas kids at home, as it should be. I can easily see them being accepted before Texas, though they make even less sense for the "Southeastern" conference. The problem you have for them is they are absolutely tied to Oklahoma State by T.Boone's money and by the Oklahoma gov't. And nobody has mentioned Oklahoma State and won't because of their inferior academics.
Look east, if you must expand. NC and VA. Don't expand simply because you're a pussy and afraid of what A&M might become some day.
Posted on 8/30/14 at 12:11 am to HempHead
quote:
I don't think you understand how 'per capita' works.
Eh I've been up for 26 hours. I'm tired, it's late and I don't particularly care at the moment.
Posted on 8/30/14 at 12:13 am to bamaoldtimer
Alabama is old news now; sorry, Tide fans
This post was edited on 8/30/14 at 12:14 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News