Hey Rebels how long will Golding be there?

I don’t think it matters what Clemson is pushing as accusations. If you buy into LSU’s troll, he isn’t good. But truth is, Ole Miss won a lot of games be recruited defense well and fielded good defenses. There were low scoring games Ole Miss won, Lane struggled, bc the defense held. Lane couldn’t score on Kentucky bc he caught them too early in the year before his offense jelled. He and Sark played all their cream puffs at the beginning to get their offense to jel and ranking up. LSU plays P4’s early.

I don’t understand the reason people think he’s not good. LSU fans don’t watch anyone else play all season and pretend they do.

Plus, Lane tampers just as much, so it’s dumb for Ole Miss to be bothered. But because Ole Miss defended Lane so much, even when his offense struggled or team faked injuries, they have to take it on the chin. It’s funny.

It’s unbelievable they think a drunk from Hammond is the next Saban. Totally delusional.

JayAg post didn’t read lol.

Another great season that didn’t result in anything, Faggy

I agree with most of what you wrote.


another point is that Lane was "offensive" mastermind right that's his calling card so he put more NIL toward offense this year and why we struggled on defense. we did not allocate funds as much toward the defense.

Pete has balance that out now and wants his defense to be stout to make his side of the ball look dominant. I think we will see a better defense this year and a slight drop off at offense but not much still have key play makers and an OC that turned around a terrible ecu offense and one with familiarity with Ole miss and the system.


Pete works hard and recruits hard, has a drive like no other and I Believe everyone will realize this at some point.

Question about Golding…

quote:

---

don’t think it matters what Clemson is pushing as accusations. If you buy into LSU's troll, he isn’t good. But truth is, Ole Miss won a lot of games be recruited defense well and fielded good defenses. There were low scoring games Ole Miss won, Lane struggled, bc the defense held. Lane couldn’t score on Kentucky bc he caught them too early in the year before his offense jelled. He and Sark played all their cream puffs at the beginning to get their offense to jel and ranking up. LSU plays P4’s early. I don’t understand the reason people think he’s not good. LSU fans don’t watch anyone else play all season and pretend they do. Plus, Lane tampers just as much, so it’s dumb for Ole Miss to be bothered. But because Ole Miss defended Lane so much, even when his offense struggled or team faked injuries, they have to take it on the chin. It’s funny.

---

Wow

quote:

---

has a drive like no other

---

Offering you a moment to clarify.

Is this hyperbolic cliche, or do you believe this is actually true?

How the frick would we know?