Started By
Message
That game yesterday was emasculating for Alabama's program
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:22 am
A game like that lingers over a program for a long time.
6
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:23 am to Lgrnwd
They were a emasculated when they hired Deborah
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:24 am to Lgrnwd
Unreal Bama stat.....48 rushing yards in last 3 games. And I thought LSU run game was abysmal.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:25 am to Lgrnwd
It’ll be the medias talking points the entire offseason. Commentators will bring it up for the next few games. And when the next years season starts, it’ll be the talking point when they take the field.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:27 am to 3rdgentgr
Bama played (Adj Rush Def)
OU (2)
UGA (8)
OU (2)
IU (4)
OU (2)
UGA (8)
OU (2)
IU (4)
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:27 am to Lgrnwd
What do you even tell recruits after that? Come here as a 5* so you can pantsed by 0*s on national TV over the holiday season?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:29 am to 3rdgentgr
well when you get down big and give up a bunch of sacks you are not really going to look good rushing the ball
They only ran the ball 8 times yesterday
They only ran the ball 8 times yesterday
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:29 am to GeauxBurrow312
I’d say 75%+ of the 5*’s don’t care as long as they get paid.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:31 am to LarryCLE
The top receiver in the 2027 class is a Alabama crystal ball but has Indiana in his top 3 and he was posting about the game on X
Shoved in a locker and recruiting lunch money stolen
Shoved in a locker and recruiting lunch money stolen
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:37 am to 3rdgentgr
quote:
48 rushing yards
Is that net of sack yardage? Cause I count 192 yds rushing in the last 3 games.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:43 am to wesfau
For some stupid reason they count QB sacks as negative yards in the rushing column. Wish they'd count it as negative passing yardage.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:44 am to wesfau
quote:one way the NFL is better than CFB is how they record sacks separately in the stat lines
Is that net of sack yardage? Cause I count 192 yds rushing in the last 3 games.
but even that is mind boggling - an OL loaded at every position giving up 144 yards in sacks over three games? yikes
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:49 am to Lgrnwd
Yeah for real ! I had to research it, because it was that bad !
Seems that after the 1971 season #2 Bama lost to #1 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl 38-6 !
I dont know what became of Bama's coach. I'm sure they fired the bum !
Seems that after the 1971 season #2 Bama lost to #1 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl 38-6 !
I dont know what became of Bama's coach. I'm sure they fired the bum !
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:50 am to 3rdgentgr
quote:
Unreal Bama stat.....48 rushing yards in last 3 games.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:51 am to tide06
quote:
Bama played (Adj Rush Def) OU (2) UGA (8) OU (2) IU (4)
But I was reliably told that Bama is the greatest football program ever and every other team sucks compared to them. If true, why would the rush defense of these teams matter? Wouldn’t the greatest program ever dominate everyone they played no matter what?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:52 am to tide06
quote:
Bama played (Adj Rush Def) OU (2) UGA (8) OU (2) IU (4)
Did teams average more or less than 16 yards rushing against those teams?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:52 am to FootballFrenzy
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:59 am to Trumansfangs
quote:
Yeah for real ! I had to research it, because it was that bad !
Seems that after the 1971 season #2 Bama lost to #1 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl 38-6 !
I dont know what became of Bama's coach. I'm sure they fired the bum !
Yeah, I was telling a friend yesterday that was the worst bowl beating we’d had since the ‘72 Orange Bowl…both losses smarted but that Nebraska loss was a tad worse because we were undefeated, ranked #2, and Bear was coaching…
Posted on 1/2/26 at 9:12 am to tide06
quote:
Bama played (Adj Rush Def)
OU (2)
UGA (8)
OU (2)
IU (4)
I'm not a fan of excuses.
Yeah, those are great run defenses, but we have the talent accumulated that we should have at least ran for what those teams average giving up (and probably a bit more). I'm not saying we should have run for 300 against each of them, but there's just too much talent to be that bad no matter how good the run defenses are.
I hope the staff takes a long, hard look at the OL coaching, scheme, and personnel and figures it out. We have a 5* RB coming in and I have no interest in watching him have no holes and constantly being hit behind the LOS.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 9:21 am to skrayper
quote:
I'm not a fan of excuses
Yep. You can't blame a top 4 run defense for only rushing with a running back 8 times. With Bama's history, I'd be pissing blood if I were a bama fan.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News