Started By
Message
Committee should be abolished... This is embarrassing
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:44 pm
Tulane and JMU.... Gtfo..
Nobody wants to see these games.
Nobody wants to see these games.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 6:45 pm
22
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:47 pm to bamabonners
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:47 pm to bamabonners
Let the BCS computers decide the rankings. It is that simple
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:48 pm to bamabonners
They’re gonna have to address this silliness
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:50 pm to prouddawg
Its amazing that the committee doesnt see the revenue they are losing by keeping teams like Notre Dame and Texas out while putting Tulane and JMU in.....not to mention the obvious disparity in talent.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:56 pm to bamabonners
I agree, I was wondering what the ratings will be for these games, look forward to seeing that intel.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:57 pm to bamabonners
Never again can this be allowed to happen
Posted on 12/20/25 at 6:57 pm to IrishDave
Great point... Texas and ND would have brought in huge audience.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:35 pm to bamabonners
quote:
Texas and ND would have brought in huge audience.
And lost just as badly
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:37 pm to bamabonners
Why should they be embarrassed? The by laws every conference agreed to were the top 5 conference champs.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:38 pm to bamabonners
DEI....
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:41 pm to Oilfieldbiology
A Sunbelt team or any G5 should see their conference championship as their ultimate prize. Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Take the top 12 based on BCS rankings and let the committee seed those 12 at the end.
Take the top 12 based on BCS rankings and let the committee seed those 12 at the end.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:41 pm to bamabonners
It’s silly, it’s basically a top 6 bye, except 5-6 get the advantage of a tune-up game, and the money that comes with an extra nationally televised home game.
What a fricking miserable idea this is.
What a fricking miserable idea this is.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:42 pm to bamabonners
Hunter Youradick.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:43 pm to bamabonners
Why are so many Gumps ignorant of the rules?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:44 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
And lost just as badly
Lol
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:44 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
And lost just as badly
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:45 pm to TigerCat33
quote:
agree, I was wondering what the ratings will be for these games, look forward to seeing that intel.
I’m not even watching. The Tulane crap was bad enough and turned off. Games today all kind of sucked.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:48 pm to Henry Jones Jr
This is what the final BCS computers came up with:
1. IU
2. Ohio St
3. UGA
4. Oregon
5. Ole Miss
6. Texas Tech
7. A&M
8. OU
9. ND
10. Bama
10. BYU (same computer average as Bama)
12. Texas
15. Miami
18. Tulane
25. James Madison
1. IU
2. Ohio St
3. UGA
4. Oregon
5. Ole Miss
6. Texas Tech
7. A&M
8. OU
9. ND
10. Bama
10. BYU (same computer average as Bama)
12. Texas
15. Miami
18. Tulane
25. James Madison
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:50 pm to bamabonners
quote:
Committee should be abolished
It wasn't the committee. They didn't make the rules. The committee actually got it right within the rules they were given. Ala-OU and Miami-aTm were good games.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News