Started By
Message

Bama changing out of conference schedules to cupcakes

Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:50 am
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
44743 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:50 am
Yes, I agree this will be the norm in the SEC. Simply can't afford an out of conference loss now, and helps Coaches not get fired as quickly.

This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:51 am
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
2891 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:51 am to
Changing?
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105629 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Bama changing out of conference schedules to cupcakes


Yea that isn't what happened at all. We added ECU about a month ago, dropped USF (to 2032) for a FCS game in 2026, added Marshall in 2027. Our next 5 years include 9 games against Florida State, Ohio State, Notre Dame, Oklahoma State and Georgia Tech.

2026
East Carolina
Chattanooga
Florida State

2027
@ Ohio State
Marshall

2028
Ohio State
UT Martin
@ Oklahoma State

2029
@ Notre Dame
Oklahoma State

2030
@ Georgia Tech
Notre Dame
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:53 am
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
10115 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to
I remember when the Gumps said LSU should not complain about being left out of the playoffs because LSU had a season-opening loss to 2023 Florida State, which may have been the best team in the country before its QB got hurt.

This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:55 am
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
50989 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to
Looks like Alabama will

2026 - Florida State
2027 - Ohio State
2028 - Ohio State and Oklahoma State
2029 - Oklahoma State and Notre Dame

Every year starting after 28 they have two P4 teams on the schedule. Curious to see if they keep doing it.. They had two P4 teams this year as well
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105629 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Now the Gumps are avoiding decent OOC games.


2027 - @ Ohio State
2028 - Ohio State
2029 - @ Notre Dame
2030 - Notre Dame


Don't be an idiot
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9872 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to
Depending on how the committee treats us this year, I see a lot of potential future scheduling changes. Right now there is zero need (and zero reward) to make an SEC schedule any more difficult than it already is.
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
10115 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

2027 - @ Ohio State
2028 - Ohio State
2029 - @ Notre Dame
2030 - Notre Dame


Don't be an idiot


Ok, that's fair.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
44743 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:55 am to
Herbie is talking to Saban. He knows what will happen to those future games you are listing as well.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:57 am
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41246 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

He knows what will happen to those future game


We'll see. I am sure some programs will do just that.

Appreciate the clarity from the gump baws, those tOhioSU games should be great.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:58 am
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50326 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I remember when the Gumps said LSU should not complain about being left out of the playoffs because LSU had a season-opening loss to 2023 Florida State


No you don’t.

2023 was a 4 team playoff, and LSU wasn’t even ranked inside the Top 10.
Posted by Decker
Member since Nov 2015
3738 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:58 am to
In 2023 LSU also lost to Ole Miss and Alabama and had no shot at the playoff. What are you talking about?
Posted by Bham Bammer
Member since Nov 2014
16310 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:58 am to
There's no reason to play hard OOC games as a Big Ten or SEC team when these committees continue to value the loss column more than anything else. They've bullshitted everyone talking about how SOS is going to be valued, and it clearly is not.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 11:01 am
Posted by Freight Joker
Member since Aug 2019
3724 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:59 am to
Respectfully, every non-conference P4 opponent we have in the horizon needs to get replaced.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11873 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:59 am to
Alabama has not dropped it's tough OOC games.

But they absolutely should. The committee has proven over and over that record is all that matters.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
44743 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

There's no reason to play hard OOC games as a Big Ten or SEC team when these committees continue to value the loss column more than anything else


Correct
Posted by Marktastic86
Pismo Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2020
20555 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Yea that isn't what happened at all. We added ECU about a month ago, dropped USF (to 2032) for a FCS game in 2026, added Marshall in 2027. Our next 5 years include 9 games against Florida State, Ohio State, Notre Dame, Oklahoma State and Georgia Tech.

Why you gotta annihilate the dude's troll post right off the bat, SOG?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
125774 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:02 am to
quote:

SummerOfGeorge
You just had to ruin it for us
Posted by notguilty
Lanett, AL
Member since Oct 2018
93 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Changing?

Bama is not dropping the game; they are pushing it back to 2032. The article states it was mutually agreed upon. USF may have requested it since their coach just left for Auburn.
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
7900 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:13 am to
It's frankly insane how, time and time again, Alabama's leadership warns about some looming situation in the sport, their rivals melt the frick down about the warning, and then everything happens exactly as Bama's leadership predicted. Remember how this board almost shut down last year when Bama's AD pointed out the obvious fact that the committee was an abomination for the SEC and they weren't handling strength of schedule correctly, and SEC teams should not schedule OOC games against teams with a pulse (insert FSU deflection here, they are still P4 with talent on the roster)? Well, here we are. Bama and UT would be locks if that had been followed, and the situation is about to get worse.

All of these P4 OOC games should be cancelled for all SEC teams, and we should go back to the 8-game schedule. This is not about Alabama or UT this year; this is about a system that clearly sucks for all 16 of us. It sucked for OM and USCe last year, it will frick your team next year if these nerds have any chance whatsoever to argue an SEC team out of the playoff. That was the entire purpose of the committee: to limit the number of SEC teams in the playoff. It's what I said last year. It's what I would say next year if Bama was 6-6 and it was Auburn on the bubble. It's very simple, what the SEC should universally want: a system, that fully values SOS and SOR. For now, the only way to achieve that other than massively overhauling the entire system is via computers.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 11:27 am
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter