Started By
Message
would Mizzou have got in at 10-2 if they beat SC
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:13 pm
I say no
14
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:14 pm to MU91
Probably not. Not enough quality wins
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:14 pm to MU91
Missou typically has the easiest SEC schedule year in and out. Along with Texas so far.
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:14 pm to MU91
No your schedule was terrible.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:15 pm to MU91
They’d put SMU in over us
Maybe if Clemson lost to SMU we could’ve taken their spot
Maybe if Clemson lost to SMU we could’ve taken their spot
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:15 pm to MU91
We wouldn't be a quality win under these circumstances
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:15 pm to MU91
If they were in SEC maybe but not likely.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:15 pm to MU91
The committee said they would penalize a team for losing their conference championship and that’s why SMU got in. Therefore I think they’d of put a 11-2 SMU in over a 10-2 non conference championship game Mizzou.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:16 pm to MU91
No bad losses! Put um in!
Seriously, win quality is irrelevant. They didn't lose any bad games and would have 10 wins. And you can't punish them for a conference title game loss as we've been told.
So why wouldn't they?
Seriously, win quality is irrelevant. They didn't lose any bad games and would have 10 wins. And you can't punish them for a conference title game loss as we've been told.
So why wouldn't they?
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:18 pm to MU91
All else being the same... maybe?
I think if they'd have been in the SECCG instead of UGA they'd have lost to Texas and be out.
But if UGA won the tiebreaker, then I think they'd be in.
I think if they'd have been in the SECCG instead of UGA they'd have lost to Texas and be out.
But if UGA won the tiebreaker, then I think they'd be in.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:19 pm to MU91
No
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:21 pm to pbro62
quote:
If they were in SEC maybe but not likely.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:21 pm to MU91
Play a real schedule then maybe.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:32 pm to MU91
I think they would be just because a 10 win SEC team carries weight, we played a better schedule than Texas for example.
We get kind of a pass for the Alabama game since that's where Cook f'ed up his hand early.
A&M was just a bad game, but a bad game hasn't stopped Alabama fans from clamoring for a spot at 9-3, or the other teams. The fact is a couple of things went wrong early and there was some bad calls, if gay and m don't get a couple of early 14 point swings the game is close just like most of our other ones.
And the other reason I think we'd make it is just TV sets, we'd bring in TV sets and the committee showed they valued that to a certain extent.
We get kind of a pass for the Alabama game since that's where Cook f'ed up his hand early.
A&M was just a bad game, but a bad game hasn't stopped Alabama fans from clamoring for a spot at 9-3, or the other teams. The fact is a couple of things went wrong early and there was some bad calls, if gay and m don't get a couple of early 14 point swings the game is close just like most of our other ones.
And the other reason I think we'd make it is just TV sets, we'd bring in TV sets and the committee showed they valued that to a certain extent.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:35 pm to PorkSammich
Strength of schedule isn’t helped by playing Arkansas each year.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:39 pm to MU91
No way...
We lost ugly to A&M and Alabama.
And if we had, we would have gotten our arse handed to us.
We lost ugly to A&M and Alabama.
And if we had, we would have gotten our arse handed to us.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:42 pm to pbro62
quote:
If they were in SEC maybe but not likely.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:56 pm to MU91
Nope.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News