Started By
Message

2024 Offenses ranked by EA Sports
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:48 am
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:48 am
Colorado in the Top 25. No Tennessee…
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:50 am to Weagle25
Colorado being at 89 is a joke. How the hell are we only 87? 

Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:50 am to Weagle25
Offense d run game ..boom..
Natty mix
Natty mix
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:51 am to Weagle25
Colorado offense above Ole Miss is kind of crazy to me. No Tennessee in the Top 25 is also surprising.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:52 am to Weagle25
Ole Miss at 13?
I wish I could bet against that.
I think their offense will get them tk the playoff.
I wish I could bet against that.
I think their offense will get them tk the playoff.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:52 am to Weagle25
Seems like EA did minimal research for this game. Been 10+ years since the last release and they can't seem to get the basic stuff right
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:54 am to Weagle25
quote:
No Tennessee
I was expecting them to be rated in the mid-80s.
Nico has only played in one game, but considering it was against a good defense you think he would get a little credit.
WR room is solid but not going to make anyone's pants tight
Sampson has shown enough to be rated decently high
OL should be good
Posted on 6/27/24 at 10:59 am to VolSquatch
Agreed.
It's a projection..so freaking project a first yr starting qb..so
DEFINITELY A TN N 25
It's a projection..so freaking project a first yr starting qb..so
DEFINITELY A TN N 25
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:00 am to Weagle25
Nobody has seen our offense yet. Wonder how they calculate their number.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:09 am to rtr23242526
quote:
It's a projection..so freaking project a first yr starting qb..so
DEFINITELY A TN N 25
I would challenge them to argue for most of the schools below 10 over UT and a couple they have in the top 10. But like I said in my first post, mid-80s seems right which would be around 15-20ish
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:11 am to Weagle25
quote:
Colorado in the Top 25

Their highest rated offensive lineman should be like a 65 overall. Their OL is absolutely atrocious.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:11 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Nobody has seen our offense yet. Wonder how they calculate their number.
Not to pick on OU because I think you deserve to be in the top 25, but lets compare UT and OU.
QB - Nico has shown more but I would be fine with Arnold being rated close to Nico
RB - probably OU
OL - Definitely UT
WR- OU better on the top end but UT is deeper
TE- Probably OU but close.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:13 am to Henry Jones Jr
Penn State at a 87 is a joke as well. Drew Allar is a middle tier QB and their WR corp is on par with Sun Belt schools
Posted on 6/27/24 at 11:15 am to Weagle25
Not super surpised that LSU is that high. I'm betting that it has a lot to do with the OL.
I would have guessed Ole Miss over LSU though.
I would have guessed Ole Miss over LSU though.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:02 pm to Weagle25
Ole Miss got hosed big time there
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:11 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
QB - Nico has shown more but I would be fine with Arnold being rated close to Nico
Nico only put the ball in the air 19 times and made easy runs of 2, 3, and 19 yards for TDs, and his entire starting Oline hadn't opted out for the draft prior to his bowl game.
I'm confident Arnold could do that.
This post was edited on 6/27/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:21 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
I'm confident Arnold could do that.
And I said they should be rated close.
The point was more than I don't see how you logically put OU in the top 25 and not UT if you're EA.
Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:21 pm to Weagle25
Milroe is gonna be a demon in this game 

Posted on 6/27/24 at 12:23 pm to Glorious
quote:yep, running qbs are gonna be a necessity at high end competition just like every other college football game.
Milroe is gonna be a demon in this game
Popular
Back to top
