Started By
Message

Ever wonder why governments are pushing hard for electric vehicles?

Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:35 am
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
5032 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:35 am
They want you to believe it’s for climate change and the environment. Dupes believe that.

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.
Posted by phaz
Waddell, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
5848 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:37 am to
And it severely limits travel
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7173 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely.




They can already do this to your home or business. They also can cut off your internet, freeze your bank accounts and credit cards, disbale your cellphone service, cut your water off and just about anything else they want to do right now.

What is your point again?
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
968 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.


You can pour gasoline from a can into a vehicle. EV chargers, particularly public ones, have some sort of connectivity/interface.

"Geekboy, you posted wrong think on the internet yesterday and we don't want your bad attitude to spread amongst the populace, therefore your EV charge is limited to 13.4 miles, just enough to get to work and back."

You'll definitely drive your arse to work to provide labor for the elites, but you won't be driving from your pod in the city out into the countryside to join the rebellion.
Posted by Screaming Viking
Member since Jul 2013
4515 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.


it is so much bigger than this. what about electronic money and no hard cash? what may the (un)intended consequences of that? changing the way credit "scores" are formulated?

this makes the power brokers more powerful, and takes away the majority of the control of the people. another unintended consequence is that the entire country becomes only as powerful as the power grid.

these moves are stupid on so many levels.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120593 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:44 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.


At this point the govt can turn off most newer ICE vehicles as well if they wanted

All have some sort of connectivity
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
2503 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:44 am to
It is all about control and power.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21482 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 8:47 am to
Anyone paying attention has been knowing this for several years now. So me, personally, no, I don't wonder why. Already know.
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
6628 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:21 am to
I’m not a fan or advocate of evs but doesn’t everyone recall that shut down of that pipeline that carries millions of gallons of gasoline from a couple of years ago ?

Here in BR if the authorities wanted to shutdown the main refinery they could do it by blocking off a few key streets to not allow access to the refinery.

Evs are just a way to wreck the economy.
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
10421 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.


You can remotely turn off electricity to an oil refinery, dumb arse.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 9:24 am
Posted by RollTide71
Member since Dec 2023
1764 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:26 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.
The way I see it is gasoline equates to freedom. If one has a vehicle and gasoline, you can pack your things, several jugs of fuel and leave democrat run cesspools for a better life in a Red State. If you've got an electric car, it's harder to pack up and move.
Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
1456 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:28 am to
Everything being done is about control, period.
Posted by OldNo.7
Fort Worth
Member since Sep 2012
1394 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:30 am to
I personally think it’s simply about attempting to create a new energy sector boom. The shot callers are jealous they missed out on oil, so they're trying to force ev, solar, wind, etc. so they can be at the top of the heap when it pops off, even if by decree

ETA the control aspect is lagniappe
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 9:33 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73282 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:34 am to
I don't have an EV because I tow 20k lbs around the country, but if one of the big three comes out with an electric HD truck with decent towing range, I'll be picking one up.

Conservatives should embrace the self-sufficiency of solar and EVs while strongly opposing the mandates being pushed.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
6117 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.


I hear ya, but you can generate electricity yourself, you can't easily produce gasoline.

I have a little cabin in the woods that is powered by a solar panel. It does everything I need. I have a friend at a power company that was working on a micro generation project that offered small hydro generators for people with ponds. We have several ponds with good flow... maybe it's time to test it out.

They will probably require cars to connect to satellite to move, so even if you generate your own power, they will just disable your vehicle remotely anyway. And if you disable the uplink, the car will be programmed to do nothing.

Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127030 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

It’s about being able to turn off electricity remotely. Can’t do that with gasoline.
So you think it would be easier and more politically acceptable to to shut down the entire electric grid than it would be to ban tanker trucks from delivering gasoline to service stations?

That's going to be hard no from me, dawg...
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16603 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:23 am to
Probably some combo of climate change, systemic racism, asphalt justice, threat to democracy, common sense disinformation control . . . or other fertilizer.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56868 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:35 am to
quote:

They want you to believe it’s for climate change and the environment. Dupes believe that.


It's about a artificial, manufactured industry. Since it's artificial and propped by govt, govt actors have their hands in the cookie jar getting paid tons to support and push it.
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19141 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Can’t do that with gasoline.


I support your point but yes the technology to kill your ICE is already in your car…

It is called OnStar in GM vehicles. All the other makers have similar
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7650 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Can’t do that with gasoline.


With the electronics of modern engines, they can shut it off if you don’t make the payments on your vehicle. And I am talking about new vehicles and not older vehicles sold at some shady dealers that are retrofitted with a tracker and immobilizer for the payments.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram