Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

More Impressive SEC Dominance: Baseball or Football

Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:24 am
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23833 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:24 am
I honestly have to say baseball. Thoughts?
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:26 am to
No way.

Consider the national champions in each sport this century. SEC is well represented in both, but football is ridiculous
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22424 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:26 am to
Both have been outstanding.
This post was edited on 6/21/23 at 8:27 am
Posted by mpwilging
Punta Gorda Isles, Florida
Member since Jan 2011
7011 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:27 am to
Or track & field, or softball. We could go on and on...
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86562 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I honestly have to say baseball. Thoughts?


My thought is you'd be wrong. Going back 17 years to 2006, 13 of those seasons were won by the SEC. That's over 76% of the national champs from the last nearly 2 decades all comign from one league.

Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23833 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

My thought is you'd be wrong. Going back 17 years to 2006, 13 of those seasons were won by the SEC. That's over 76% of the national champs from the last nearly 2 decades all comign from one league.


If you take into account the massive demographical advantage the SEC has, it makes more sense why the SEC dominates in football. Football dominance is really just a regional dominance that was started by Miami in the 80s. Being that baseball talent isn't as concentrated on a map like football talent is, it is more impressive that the SEC dominates due to development of players.
Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
7729 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

My thought is you'd be wrong. Going back 17 years to 2006, 13 of those seasons were won by the SEC. That's over 76% of the national champs from the last nearly 2 decades all comign from one league.


With 5 different Teams from the SEC. Only 3 teams have won that were not in the SEC.

Baseball has won the last 8 out of 13, with 6 different teams.

Both pretty impressive.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19734 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Baseball has won the last 8 out of 13, with 6 different teams.


And it would be 7 if one could catch up a popup.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23833 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:40 am to
Still the most frustrating baseball play I have ever witnessed. Buckner aint got shite on those three
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:48 am to
Agree

Look at all the schools that have won nattys in baseball since UGA was the first SEC team to do so in 1990.

UGA
LSU x 6
Vandy x 2
Carolina x 2
Florida
Miss State
Ole Miss
Arkansas a dropped popup away
Bama made the final in 97
Auburn made CWS 2 out of 3 years
Vols making CWS 2 out of 3 years
Kentucky made supers this year
A&M went to Omaha in 2022

15 times starting in 1990, the SEC has had 3 or more teams in Omaha. 14 titles by 7 different schools, 4 of which ain't sniffing natties in football or men's hoops.

Football is damn impressive but the Big Six continues to dominate. Baseball gives nearly every program hope. Except Mizzou.
Posted by GreatPumpkin
Member since Mar 2022
1829 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:51 am to
Baseball. So many of our top players the last few years are Tennessee boys. That local connection is something you just don’t get in other sports
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35460 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 8:58 am to
It's football

Climate and being able to play baseball almost year round gives the south a leg up on most of the country.

Even without Alabama, the SEC has had other viable teams that could've contended in football each of those years
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65111 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Consider the national champions in each sport this century.

This century, 6 different SEC programs have won national titles in baseball.

LSU 2
USC 2
Vandy 2
Florida 1
State 1
Ole Miss 1

Baseball has also had 11 different programs reach the CWS, and a 12th (Alabama) reached in 1999. Kentucky and Missouri are the only outliers there.

In football, that national title number is 5.

LSU 3
Alabama 6
UGA 2
Florida 2
Auburn 1

To have a relative comparison to the CWS, 10 different programs have reached BCS/NY6 bowls this century.

SEC teams have faced one another in the national title series 3 times in baseball and twice in football.

I'd say it's pretty damn close, with football being a little less balanced and a little more top heavy.

And if we want to bring women's sports into the fold, SEC womens softball is right up there in terms of top to bottom dominance.
This post was edited on 6/21/23 at 10:04 am
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45067 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:05 am to
quote:

If you take into account the massive demographical advantage the SEC has, it makes more sense why the SEC dominates in football. Football dominance is really just a regional dominance that was started by Miami in the 80s. Being that baseball talent isn't as concentrated on a map like football talent is, it is more impressive that the SEC dominates due to development of players.


This is canceled out when you consider that outside of the SEC's footprint, there might be 5 schools in America who put any money into their baseball programs. College baseball does not have some big national following like a lot of people on this site seem to think it does.
Posted by ChadThundercock
Germany
Member since Mar 2020
554 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:24 am to
I would also agree with baseball. There’s 129 FBS teams and only 30 or so have a realistic chance. The field of possible baseball champions is massive. A team like Coastal Carolina winning a championship is only possible in baseball.
Posted by NawFoo
Member since Mar 2023
833 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:27 am to
Dominance: Football
Conference strength: Baseball
Posted by goodgrin
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2003
5946 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 10:27 am to
Both
Posted by TideFaninFl
On the space coast
Member since Oct 2017
6654 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 11:06 am to
quote:

If you take into account the massive demographical advantage the SEC has, it makes more sense why the SEC dominates in football. Football dominance is really just a regional dominance that was started by Miami in the 80s. Being that baseball talent isn't as concentrated on a map like football talent is, it is more impressive that the SEC dominates due to development of players.


Well, the SEC won 3 NC in football in the 50's, 3 in the 60's, 3 in the 70's and the only decade they did not win 3 or more since then was 1 in the 80's.
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4469 posts
Posted on 6/21/23 at 11:19 am to
I'd say baseball if only because more teams if the conference have won championships
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter