Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/5/21 at 12:14 pm to IAmNERD
Setting the AG commentary aside for a moment - do you think Georgia or Alabama would be sitting one of their best defensive players in a situation like this? I certainly appreciate doing things by the book but at what point do we stop trying to be the noble loser?
Posted on 10/5/21 at 12:14 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
What a stupid rebuttal.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 12:16 pm to aujerm
quote:
do you think Georgia or Alabama would be sitting one of their best defensive players in a situation like this?
What is the situation?
quote:
I certainly appreciate doing things by the book but at what point do we stop trying to be the noble loser?
What rules were violated?
Posted on 10/5/21 at 12:16 pm to aujerm
quote:
What a stupid rebuttal.
You're the one that wants to clean house based on absolutely zero knowledge of the situation, but you do you. You're entitled to your overreaction.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 1:10 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
It’s been widely reported that he’s being held out due to a compliance issue. That is a fact. Please feel free to enlighten us on the details. Surely you know them based on your holier than thou response.
My question still stands - do you think Alabama or UGA would hold one of their best defensive players out of a game like this due to a compliance issue? Any compliance issue? The answer is no. This would be swept under the rug and anyone that came sniffing would get the middle finger or worse.
My question still stands - do you think Alabama or UGA would hold one of their best defensive players out of a game like this due to a compliance issue? Any compliance issue? The answer is no. This would be swept under the rug and anyone that came sniffing would get the middle finger or worse.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 1:21 pm to aujerm
quote:
do you think Alabama or UGA would hold one of their best defensive players out of a game like this due to a compliance issue? Any compliance issue? The answer is no.
The NCAA does not hold Auburn in the same light as it does UGA or bama.........especially bama. Previous history has proven.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 1:30 pm to aujerm
quote:
It’s been widely reported that he’s being held out due to a compliance issue.
Well duh, i'm glad you can read.
quote:
Please feel free to enlighten us on the details. Surely you know them based on your holier than thou response.
Wait, you don't have the details? Yet you want to gut the entire compliance department? I'm shocked. Holier than thou? No. More reasonable than thou? Sure.
quote:
My question still stands - do you think Alabama or UGA would hold one of their best defensive players out of a game like this due to a compliance issue? Any compliance issue? The answer is no. This would be swept under the rug and anyone that came sniffing would get the middle finger or worse.
What an absurd question. How can you expect anyone to be able to answer it when you have absolutely zero idea what the actual compliance issue is.
This post was edited on 10/5/21 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 10/5/21 at 1:43 pm to aujerm
Dumbest post of the week
Posted on 10/5/21 at 2:00 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
What an absurd question..
It doesn’t matter what the compliance issue is if the school/AD doesn’t give a flying frick about following said rules. Their answer will be to do whatever is best for their on the field results.
It’s apparent that we’re playing by a different set of rules than our rivals if one of our best players is missing significant time because of something compliance related.
This post was edited on 10/5/21 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 10/5/21 at 2:41 pm to aujerm
quote:Uhh, its been like this since 1959. Are you an AU alum? I'm also not terribly upset that AU is trying to follow compliance rules either.
It’s apparent that we’re playing by a different set of rules than our rivals if one of our best players is missing significant time because of something compliance related.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 3:08 pm to aujerm
quote:
t’s been widely reported that he’s being held out due to a compliance issue. That is a fact. Please feel free to enlighten us on the details. Surely you know them based on your holier than thou response.
My question still stands - do you think Alabama or UGA would hold one of their best defensive players out of a game like this due to a compliance issue? Any compliance issue? The answer is no. This would be swept under the rug and anyone that came sniffing would get the middle finger or worse.
A compliance issue 4 games into a player's senior season?
That's a new one...and weird.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 3:28 pm to aujerm
quote:
Setting the AG commentary aside for a moment - do you think Georgia or Alabama would be sitting one of their best defensive players in a situation like this?
I have zero clue as to why he is sitting. If it's a compliance issue, yeah he has to sit. Is it really worth penalizing the entire team for one guy? Absolutely not.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 3:29 pm to aujerm
quote:
It doesn’t matter what the compliance issue is if the school/AD doesn’t give a flying frick about following said rules. Their answer will be to do whatever is best for their on the field results.
quote:
s apparent that we’re playing by a different set of rules than our rivals if one of our best players is missing significant time because of something compliance related.
Wow, your takes just keep getting dumber and dumber.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 3:58 pm to alpinetiger
quote:
Uhh, its been like this since 1959. Are you an AU alum? I'm also not terribly upset that AU is trying to follow compliance rules either.
Yep, used to be bama breaks the rules, Auburn goes on probation.
Posted on 10/5/21 at 5:22 pm to alpinetiger
Yea I know how selective the NCAA can be sometimes with dishing out penalties With that being said the enforcement division doesn’t have the set of teeth they did 15+ years ago.
I just don’t think we can be good stewards of the ncaa rule book and still compete for championships consistently considering what is going on elsewhere in the conference. I’ll leave it at that.
I just don’t think we can be good stewards of the ncaa rule book and still compete for championships consistently considering what is going on elsewhere in the conference. I’ll leave it at that.
This post was edited on 10/5/21 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 10/5/21 at 6:01 pm to aujerm
From my understanding of asking around this isn't an NCAA compliance issue but an Auburn compliance issue for TD. I think I've said what the rumor is so take it for what it's worth. And no I don't know if its true or not.
I'll be the first to blame admin but not sure this is an admin or AD situation
I'll be the first to blame admin but not sure this is an admin or AD situation
Posted on 10/5/21 at 6:22 pm to CorchJay
Is it what you posted on the first page? That would have to be a pretty serious infraction to just be done like that *if* that is what it is. I don’t want to spin rumors that I don’t know what the issue is. Just if that is what it is, damn.
Posted on 10/6/21 at 9:25 pm to aujerm
Compliance issue having to do with getting a car loaned to him by a booster. The decision is out of Harsin’s hands right now.
Posted on 10/6/21 at 9:29 pm to AuSteeler
quote:
A compliance issue 4 games into a player's senior season?
Other boards are saying the issue is Moultry received benefits as a recruit. It is very weird, though, that this is only coming out 5 years later.
Maybe Gus wasn't as clean as we thought?
Page 3 of 5
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News