Started By
Message
Posted on 6/24/25 at 11:37 pm to LanierSpots
I think the quarterback has to be elite, all problems solved to having a good season. Oh and play calling. This team is going to be violent. There are plenty of 3 and low 4 stars trying to get paid. Being violent and physical will be the difference in big money for those kids. Question is will the guys making the cash earn it.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 1:50 pm to awestruck
quote:
(jus not on a plane)
Worked for basketball.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:55 pm to CorchJay
quote:
We will win the games that we play more violent then the other team. It’s really that simple.
No lies detected …

Posted on 6/25/25 at 5:58 pm to cadillacattack
These are the threads that keep me coming back
Posted on 6/25/25 at 7:01 pm to wareaglepete
quote:What if Howard had a different ride that day?
Worked for basketball
Him in sync would of been good for the team.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 7:19 pm to cadillacattack
I’m glad some folks are coming around to what I posted.
The pearl clutchers in here… “oh my god he said violence” . figs
Like I said since the turn of the new year we must be more physical. Yes that includes violence. You have to be willing to beat the guy in front of you into quitting. That’s how you walk away from teams in the 4th quarter.
Let’s put it out there? On offense how many people on here think the RPO or Freeze’s RPO is going to “out scheme” defensive coordinators in the SEC?
I would answer that and say very few and only because we might have found a favorable matchup to exploit against some weaker opponents
The pearl clutchers in here… “oh my god he said violence” . figs
Like I said since the turn of the new year we must be more physical. Yes that includes violence. You have to be willing to beat the guy in front of you into quitting. That’s how you walk away from teams in the 4th quarter.
Let’s put it out there? On offense how many people on here think the RPO or Freeze’s RPO is going to “out scheme” defensive coordinators in the SEC?
I would answer that and say very few and only because we might have found a favorable matchup to exploit against some weaker opponents
Posted on 6/25/25 at 9:21 pm to CorchJay
quote:
Let’s put it out there? On offense how many people on here think the RPO or Freeze’s RPO is going to “out scheme” defensive coordinators in the SEC?
Offense is so old and stale. You better either have studs all over and just run basic pro stuff and make plays and beat them that way or have something new and innovative.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:05 pm to CorchJay
Since you promised a report back, what criteria will you use to evaluate our violence level? Will each player get a rating? Unit? What rating is required to win? Is it possible to win a game if the violence level is below your standard? Can we be ultra violent and still lose?
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:00 am to RandySavage
Measure = Effort(subjective), line push, sacks, caused fumbles, big hits
There you go.
There you go.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:58 am to RandySavage
quote:
Can we be ultra violent and still lose?

Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:13 am to CorchJay
quote:
On offense how many people on here think the RPO or Freeze’s RPO is going to “out scheme” defensive coordinators in the SEC?
I’m probably the only person that does not particularly care for “RPO.”
It requires exquisite timing and perfect decision making by the QB and the WR.
I guess it’s high risk, high reward.
I prefer calling a play, audible IF the alignment does not suit that play, and execute at a high level.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 11:21 am to wareaglepete
The RPO is the most used offensive model in the game from high school, to college, to the NFL. Almost every team runs some kind of RPO.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:02 pm to makersmark1
quote:
I’m probably the only person that does not particularly care for “RPO.”
It requires exquisite timing and perfect decision making by the QB and the WR.
Meh, idk that the decision making and timing is as big of a deal now as it was 10 years ago with the RPO offense. Most of the kids have been playing that kind of ball their whole lives. Yes, the QB must make the right decision first and foremost. Everyone needs to be on the same page pre-snap at bare minimum.
quote:
I guess it’s high risk, high reward.
Every scheme is a risk/reward trade-off. An example from an opposing defense last year was the OU game. They bring a ton of people on a blitz,but drop one linebacker into the perfect spot and it is a pick six that wins them the game. Had that guy been late in his drop or if the ball goes to the other side of the field there's a good chance our sideline is celebrating because we scored a long TD to wrap the game up. High risk/High reward for OU that paid off bigly.
quote:
I prefer calling a play, audible IF the alignment does not suit that play, and execute at a high level.
That has its place in the game which brings me back to your first point. The decision making and timing can be summed up in one word: "Execution". Remember the Georgia game? Late in the game...4th qtr has just started...Offense is driving while down 21-0...So a score here keeps us in the game and gives us all the momentum...4th down and we have the perfect play...IF Thorne hands it off to his RB...Well, he pulls it, runs straight into a defender...There goes all momentum and UGA punches it in shortly after to put a bow on their win.
If the play was executed correctly, we are still in that game and who knows what could have happened. Instead, the team mentally fell apart and just rolled over. Execution is key.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:05 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Every scheme is a risk/reward trade-off.
When you blitz, someone's band is going to play...
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:11 pm to IAmNERD
I don’t disagree with you thoughts.
I probably am more conservative than most in what I think about offensive football.
1. Play clean.
2. Protect the football.
As far as run/pass, I prefer a physical running game with play action down field passes mixed in.
I’m not into double reverse, pitch back to QB razzle dazzle orbit motion stuff.
It takes too long and you have to protect for a long time.
I’m a Luddite. I enjoyed the game when we ran so good back in the day.
I probably am more conservative than most in what I think about offensive football.
1. Play clean.
2. Protect the football.
As far as run/pass, I prefer a physical running game with play action down field passes mixed in.
I’m not into double reverse, pitch back to QB razzle dazzle orbit motion stuff.
It takes too long and you have to protect for a long time.
I’m a Luddite. I enjoyed the game when we ran so good back in the day.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:11 pm to wesfau
What percent of our plays does everyone think are true RPO, like here’s the formation, you have these options, let’s go vs RPO where it’s a called pass play and RPO is only to come into play in a breakdown?
Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:43 pm to wareaglepete
Percentage I would say 75-80 percent
Posted on 6/27/25 at 5:15 pm to CorchJay
Physical violence huh?
Guess I’m more on board with mental toughness & football IQ
Guess I’m more on board with mental toughness & football IQ
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top



1









