Started By
Message

re: Let's talk About Pittman's new contract desires...

Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:24 pm to
Posted by V Bainbridge
Member since Jul 2020
8118 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Sam has Arkansas in the position Ole Miss and MSU are in this year

Both MSU and OM had much easier schedules than we did. You keep pointing to his record without acknowledging that it came from the hardest schedule in the nation 2 years in a row. It also completely ignores the excellent job he has done in recruiting and the portal.

It's a shallow view to support a shallow point that isn't really a problem to you unless you are a big booster. It isn't your money. Stop being butt hurt like it is and be happy that Pitt is getting a well deserved payday.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
66128 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

OM had much easier schedules than we did.
They also beat us.

quote:

It also completely ignores the excellent job he has done in recruiting and the portal.
By the numbers he's been right at average for an Arkansas head coach up to this point.

quote:

It's a shallow view to support a shallow point that isn't really a problem to you unless you are a big booster. It isn't your money. Stop being butt hurt like it is and be happy that Pitt is getting a well deserved payday.
It doesn't have to be your own money to want it allocated responsibly throughout the staff when you know you have a CEO-type coach that heavily relies on his assistants. Sorry if I don't agree with letting Sexton bend over this program and have us overpaying for one person and misusing funds in the long term. Very stupid and lazy argument there. It's not rocket science to put together that the more money Sam makes personally, the less funds there will be to give to assistants. The budget isn't infinite.
Posted by ArHog
Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2008
39202 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:39 pm to
LofrickinL

So the market suggests we pay this much for an 8-4 Coach.


Welcome to the wild, Wild West of semi pro football.

Maybe it's about time to "answer the call" again.


Posted by V Bainbridge
Member since Jul 2020
8118 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

They also beat us.

He is 1-1 against Kiff with his loss being much more of a game than his win.
quote:

By the numbers he's been right at average for an Arkansas head coach up to this point.

You're right. Hicks and Starkel were just as good as Franks. You aren't being objective if this is your view of it.
quote:

Sorry if I don't agree with letting Sexton bend over this program

Sexton bends over damn near every SEC program. It's literally his job. He specializes in spreading cheeks for checks.

I'm actually impressed with Pitt. I've always thought he was a dumb arse for not using Sexton. What kind of idiot screws themselves out of millions of dollars in a sign of loyalty to people who will be anything but loyal if the situation was reversed?
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
66128 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Hicks and Starkel were just as good as Franks.
I didn't even mention Chad but ok. Seeth all you want but Pittman has been average in recruiting for an Arkansas head coach. Our relative ranking has not changed one bit. Who isn't being objective? Your line of thinking here is literally, "He's better than Chad so pay him premium."

quote:

Sexton bends over damn near every SEC program. It's literally his job. He specializes in spreading cheeks for checks.
So we should just get in line? Looks like it's working out great for everyone not named Bama.

Thank God HY thinks more like me than you.
This post was edited on 12/12/21 at 7:01 pm
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 7:29 pm to
I'm all for HY giving pittman incentives to make him a top coach over the next year or two. assuming he wins games in accordance of a top coach. double or triple the current ones even.

Top coaches don't drop games to a 6-6 auburn. Top coaches don't have big drop offs and find ways to always make a bowl game and go .500
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
66128 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

I'm all for HY giving pittman incentives to make him a top coach over the next year or two. assuming he wins games in accordance of a top coach. double or triple the current ones even.
Yep. No problem with paying him elite money when he wins like an elite coach. Let him win the games first, though. Huge incentives are the way to go.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18471 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 7:47 pm to
I think he’s just setting the price high expecting to settle around 5 maybe 6 or get some restructured contract with better incentives. If he really wants 7 mil then I agree let him walk promote Kendall and keep Odom. But this is all for nothing because Pitt is here to stay
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25600 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 7:50 pm to
OU is gonna pay Venables 7.25 per and brought in a$2M OC but I’m sure all the posts will be from expert AD’s and know HC evaluation criteria
Posted by Porker Face
Eden Isle
Member since Feb 2012
16021 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Issue is Hunter by himself can't change the market prices or coaching salaries without tanking our program.


Maybe he shouldn't've been flapping his gums about it then??
Posted by Razorback Reverend
Member since Dec 2013
24074 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 8:19 pm to
I agree with everything Drew said above.

Pittman is good, not great. When I looked back at 247 recruiting, we are above average for Arkansas period... Not much better.

He is a CEO coach who will only be as good as his talent, and coordinators.

He lost to 6-6 Auburn at home with Auburn having a 1st time HC who used to be at ... Arkansas State.

3rd in the west, and lost to Georgia by bunches... Not even competitive with Georgia.

Base and structure all $$$ to be incentives as to production in recruiting, and on the field results period.

You want 5 million win 9 next season, have a top 15 class... Wan't 6 million Win enough to be in a NY6 game.. want 7, win the SEC or at least get into the playoffs.

Something like the above. We must, must, MUST have more for assistants period!
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8960 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

You want 5 million win 9 next season, have a top 15 class... Wan't 6 million Win enough to be in a NY6 game.. want 7, win the SEC or at least get into the playoffs.


He is getting 5 to 6…
If he gets us in a NY6, he is getting 7.
If he gets in the playoffs, he will get 8-9.

Do coaches deserve all that? Who knows, estimates say each championship brings in $20m+.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
43680 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 8:58 pm to
The problem isn't paying them to coach, the issue is always what it costs to get rid of them when you no longer want to pay them to coach.

This is Pittman's last fbs hc job, he has no leverage for a huge buyout.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
27217 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Pittman is good, not great. When I looked back at 247 recruiting, we are above average for Arkansas period... Not much better.


Pittman in his first year was +1 coach effect, which is good. In his second year, he was +3, which is elite and one of the best HCs in the P5.

He and Kiffin were by far the best coaches in the SEC this year. Kiffin also had +3 coach effect.

Arkansas also recruits at the bottom of the SEC West, and if OU and Texas come into the West, Arkansas will continue to recruit at the bottom, even though they are a top 30 recruiter.

Here's a trend to remember. Coaches that begin their careers with + coach effect almost always remain there positive. Coaches who begin their career with negative coach effect almost always stay negative as well.

It's why Chad was a -2 Coach effect coach at SMU and he was a -2 coach at Arkansas as well.

This trend means that Pittman is on pace to win 6-9 games every year at Arkansas, all while being outtalented by almost every SEC team he plays. That's a guy you pay.

And if he can actually improve recruiting to say, the mid teens, then you're looking at the possibility of 10-11 wins as your ceiling instead of 8-9. And floor of about 7 wins.

The division is brutal. It's the toughest in the nation and it isn't close. Pay the man and pay his asistants. You are not going to get a better head coach than him. There arent too many with better coach effect than Pitt.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41536 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Pittman in his first year was +1 coach effect, which is good. In his second year, he was +3, which is elite and one of the best HCs in the P5.


Where does one go to see these rankings?
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8960 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 11:42 pm to
Put a huge buyout if he is 60%+ in games and it cuts in half sub 60%. Then 10% off that every 10% lower he goes.
Posted by FayetteNAM
Boston Mountains
Member since Jun 2013
8960 posts
Posted on 12/12/21 at 11:57 pm to
I honestly don’t know how any of the contract shite works, like most everyone else bitching about it.

But it seems we can all agree he isn’t 7.25m return. Maybe he is, it’s a break even with tickets if he sells 75k at $20 a ticket if you divide by the 7 home games. With a surplus of 500k a game.

I know tickets aren’t $20 a piece, so it’s actually a surplus. But that’s only for the head coaches cost. Now what about all the assistants that’s another 5.5m and the surplus is only 500k X 7 = 3.5m. Then we pay to rent that shite heap in Little Rock. Pay to rent wins in lower divisions.

All this to say I would like to see a 5m base with incentives that include winning the national championship that puts him at Sabans level that year, but if he loses them all, we still just have to pay $5m.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
27217 posts
Posted on 12/13/21 at 6:08 am to
quote:

Meyers was/is extremely talented.Too bad he became so full of himself that many in Hollywood don't want to work with em


Patreon - CFB Matrix.

Off the top of my head the best P5 coaches this year were:

Dave Clawson - Wake (finished the season +5 I think)

Chris Kleiman - K state

Jonathan Smith - Oregon State

Kiffin/Pittman tied at +3

Both had elite years as head coaches.


...

For reference, Sark finished -6 and so did Butch Jones at A-state. I think Ed O finished - 5.

Those are the worst of the worst.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
26888 posts
Posted on 12/13/21 at 6:54 am to
Ah yes. We were over due for the dreaded "everyone gets a bad case of the vapors and starts melting down" thread on football.

To start with... yes, coach salaries are going through the roof for college football. G5 teams are talking about 5 million dollar salaries for their coaches now to keep them from getting poached. An initial asking price of 7.25 isn't out of the question for someone who has had Pittman's results. Taking a team that was destroyed by the previous head coach and going 11-11 despite playing the toughest schedule in the country back to back? That puts you in pretty good company.

That would put him making more money than Kirby Smart!!!! Yep. And if you believe that Kirby Smart isn't going to be getting a pay raise soon I have ocean front property in Bentonville to offer you.

5 million a year, in a couple of years, is going to be a bottom feeder salary in the SEC after the next round of contract negotiations goes through. Right now it would put you solidly in the middle of the pack but in a few years... The good news is that nothing attracts elite level coaches like offering rock bottom prices on their salaries thank goodness.

So what is going to happen is this... Yurachek is going to respond to that offer with a counter offer. They are going to haggle over terms, which is what ADs and agents do. They will come to agreement for something a bit less than what Sexton wants and a bit more than what Yurachek wants. People on here will clutch their pearls and swoon over the figure.

The Arkansas Athletic Department will continue to turn a profit, something we managed to do for decades until Covid and Jeff Long's mismanagement put a hitch in our giddyup (we are going to be paying off those stadium upgrades for a while folks).

Or we can lowball Pittman, who can certainly afford to mosey off to his retirement home and kick back. Surely we will attract an elite level coach despite losing out on Drinkypoo to Missouri last time around and getting bailed out by Pittman when no one else wanted the job.
Posted by Poker_hog
Member since Mar 2019
3600 posts
Posted on 12/13/21 at 8:20 am to
quote:

The problem isn't paying them to coach, the issue is always what it costs to get rid of them when you no longer want to pay them to coach.


That’s the number one thing for me. Time and time again the argument for keeping a bad coach is we can’t afford to fire him. I’m not sure what the market is for a 60 yo CEO type head coach with a short track record of success. I am sure it’s not 50 mill guaranteed.

At the same time Pittman doesn’t deserve to be the lowest paid coach in the league. The incentives for the first contract were a joke. Bonus for going 6-6….
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter