Started By
Message

re: Alabama Basketball 2026-27 roster tracker

Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:47 am to
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
9341 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:47 am to
LSU and Wade look like they are going almost entirely the international route. Be interesting to see how that looks.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46346 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Spend 5-8 million dollars and hope someone will be like “wow I never considered FedEx but now that it’s in a jersey I guess I will!”



It's more of a subconscious thing. You see the ad constantly and eventually when faced with a decision about what to pick in that category of product there are increased odds you go with the one you think of the most. Like how if you get sideswiped by a semi on 65 North, Shunnarah is hoping his shite eating grin is the last thing you see before losing consciousness and going into the ambulance.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

It's more of a subconscious thing. You see the ad constantly and eventually when faced with a decision about what to pick in that category of product there are increased odds you go with the one you think of the most


Yeah I guess I understand the concept of it but it doesn’t work on me. Like I would never in a million years think of hiring Shunnarah. His ads make me think of him negatively.

Ads can be done effectively. I think Coke does an amazing job of marketing themselves.

I always think of the quote “you never see a commercial for Ferrari because our customers aren’t sitting around watching tv”. Sometimes your brand and the way you present yourself is worth a lot more than the dollars you would make whoring it out to Verizon or whatever.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13167 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

In all seriousness…the end game for this is all the non profit sports are going to go away. Boosters will get tired of spending because rich people don’t get rich by throwing money away. But there’s no putting the cork back in this bottle fully so ultimately sports that bleed money are going to go away or be scaled WAYYYY back which might not be the worst thing in the world. I like all of our teams to be great but realistically if a program is losing multi millions of dollars then it probably should find a way to not do that.


We all make this mistake from time to time and I have to remind myself of it constantly in this subject area: the very tip top of the wealth pyramid are wealthy in ways that are alien to the average man's mind.

A small millionaire is probably about the extent of what an average middle income person can understand. People who diligently save for retirement over a long career will often - but not always - end up being a small millionaire by retirement. Though they will likely be chewing down principle and losing that status as soon as they achieve millionaire status. We can sort of comprehend how someone with several million in assets can live. Bigger home, nicer car, probably still works for a living.

However by the time you get 100 million, the habits and lifestyles of those people really become a bit foreign. I'm acquainted with a few retired-in-their-30s silicon valley types who were on at the right companies early and cashed out after their IPOs. Their social media suggests a constant stream of chartered jet flights, parties, and vacations. They don't really have to do anything but let their money grow and it is hard to imagine them spending their way to ruin unless their banker swindles them.

Anyway, my point being that billionaires or very substantial 9-digit millionaires can essentially fund a college athletics roster every year until the end of time and their money will likely grow more than all of those college athletics payroll expenses plus what it would cost to maintain their standard of living.

Fanbases that are dependent on the small millionaires are in trouble because the 9/10-digit wealthy can just keep on doing this without noticing the effect on their bottom line.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Anyway, my point being that billionaires or very substantial 9-digit millionaires can essentially fund a college athletics roster every year until the end of time and their money will likely grow more than all of those college athletics payroll expenses plus what it would cost to maintain their standard of living.



They definitely could. I just don’t know if they will. Most of these people are highly competitive but they’ve always channeled that toward financials. Are they going to be satisfied long term buying players for Ohio State when they could have that money tied into stocks or using it as mergers or buying up competitors?


40 million every year in perpetuity toward random players where you get nothing back but pride is 40 million you’re not using to choke the life out of your corporate competition where you probably feel more pride because YOU did it and you’re making money off it.

But who knows. Maybe they will. If I was a billionaire I’d 100% buy players but that mindset is why I’ll never come close. My priorities aren’t wired to wealth accumulation
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13167 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:59 am to
If a billion dollars of cash was invested in a conservative strategy, it would probably net between 40-50 million a year.

Of course, most billionaires are not holding all their wealth in liquid cash. However, they're likely invested in various things that are netting returns greater than the 4%-ish of very conservative strategies.

The schools with billionaires who are committed to the support are probably golden until that billionaire croaks and the wealth needs to be split up among their entitled, soft spawn.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 9:01 am
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
9341 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:00 am to
I don’t think there’s any doubt that Oats will put a quality team on the floor.

I just think the frustrating thing would be if this ends up as a 4-5 seed and again loses in the Sweet 16 to much better much more expensive team.

Just not sure with what we are spending and what other teams are spending, if Final Fours and national championships are a realistic, attainable goal.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13167 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:03 am to
It is not hard to argue that we're being priced out of being a national title contender but also being priced in as a consistent top 25 team as the mid-major ranks wither and die as glorified developmental leagues for the power conferences.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:13 am to
We were leading the Nation Champion at the half in what was basically a home game for them with what was probably our worst roster in 5 years.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13167 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:22 am to
The thing about buying championships is that while it is probably easier to do in basketball than football, it isn't a turnkey solution to just throw money at a roster and cut nets.

I think it is going to be harder for Nate to get over the hump than I thought it would be after 2023 where it felt like we had a championship caliber roster but just got unlucky.

However, we still just need to stay in this top 16-ish range with a roster that gels well enough on defense plus 6 good offensive games.

I do wonder if we're getting priced out a bit however we've played in a 2 S16, 1 E8, and 1 F4 in the last 4 seasons and really only had a good defensive unit in one of those four seasons (and that was the year we were the most unlucky).
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26681 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 11:01 am to
[img]We were leading the Nation Champion at the half in what was basically a home game for them with what was probably our worst roster in 5 years.[/img]

Without probably our best shooter and we did not shoot well. On a good shooting night that game is single digits and their big is a non factor.
Posted by Fleurs
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2016
1407 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

but it doesn’t work on me
(yes it does)
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20083 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 3:15 pm to
We need to do pe deal like Utah and put that money in silver.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 3:18 pm to
Well can’t argue with that logic. Guess I’ve been wrong about…me…this whole time
Posted by Fleurs
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2016
1407 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 4:49 pm to
yeah i mean everybody thinks it doesn't work on themself we all think we're special, etc., but as a matter of routine 101 level human psychology, it 100% does. of course that doesnt mean every ad works on you, but the idea you're immune to the immense amount of advertising you're subjected to is a common delusion.

which, going back to the original point, is of course exactly why the companies spend so much of their money on it, because they know beyond any shadow of a doubt that it does.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

yeah i mean everybody thinks it doesn't work on themself we all think we're special, etc.


I’m willing to concede advertising works on the majority of people or these companies wouldn’t spend obscene amounts of money on it. I think it’s stupid but I can admit it’s obviously effective.

For me I can sincerely say it doesn’t. I don’t even have cable to see a bunch of ads like that. I live a pretty minimalist lifestyle and I don’t buy stupid bullshite. The car I drive doesn’t run ads. My insurance agent is someone I know and not a talking lizard or the guy from Oz.

I guess to your point I’m AWARE these companies exist but I actively choose not to buy products from companies that spend obscene amounts of money on commercials. If their goal is to make me not want to use their product then I guess they’re doing great.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
7059 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:38 pm to
I’m excited to see our 2026 Home schedule. Purdue last year was so cool.

I bet they had 1200 fans in ttown, minimum.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8468 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:05 pm to
Same. Hoping we end up back in the Vegas tournament. Also hoping we get a fun draw in the SEC/ACC but we’ll probably get Clemson again
Posted by My2Bits
2500 mi from Tuscaloosa due west
Member since Jun 2012
5694 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

The schools with billionaires who are committed to the support are probably golden until that billionaire croaks and the wealth needs to be split up among their entitled, soft spawn


We had ONE billionaire supporting us ,Hugh Culverhouse; he croaks, son takes over , possibly a non-alumnus and promptly finds a reason to turn off the spigot.
Don’t think we have had another billionaire funding us since then.

Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
9341 posts
Posted on 5/6/26 at 5:22 am to
I have a feeling, like football, most of the big time home and homes are going to go away. Will move to neutral site games.
first pageprev pagePage 42 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter