Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Birmingham
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1422
Registered on:12/28/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 6:12 pm to
if thinking it's pitiful you guys are still on about this amounts to "stanning" (sic), sure.

the good news is that it was extremely unpopular, both locally and nationally, when the ua power brokers tried this before, so much like the new ua president trying to take the med school from uab, you do not have to worry at all about them trying again any time soon. uab has a football team now and thats that. there is zero percent chance it changes any time soon. (goes for both.)

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 6:05 pm to
would be an extremely unusual arrangement, surely youd agree.

you guys already tried getting rid fo the team. you lost. they have a team now.

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

I guess we are going to find out soon because I don’t think UA got a new president with a medical background by accident.
i wouldnt hold my breath if i were you! lmao

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

. The importance of medicine in research accounts why they’re modestly higher than the flagship

i guess if it's medical research it doesnt count? as if this is an argument against what i said... but sure, they're a tier 2 medical school nationally, a top 12 receiver in NIH funding. there is nothing else remotely close to that in this state, let alone in the ua system. take issue with 'elite', sure. but that's the obvious point being made.

and it's not like the campuses are actually in competition in this way; they are complimentary parts of the same system, a system in which uab is bringing substantial revenue, more than any other campus as i said.

i think it's fine if they have a shitty football team personally.

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Interestingly, it is a shitstorm if UAB doesn’t have football but if UA wants to have a full blown school of medicine the UAB power brokers will suffocate that idea in the crib.
it is certainly interesting that you think this is plausible at ths point, lol

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:48 pm to
the ridiculous blunder that led to the system having an elite research institution in the state's major city that brings in more revenue than any of its other campuses.

opinions vary on how much of a blunder it was i guess.

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

The only reason those aren’t UA’s numbers is because of political maneuvering by the city (perhaps aided by Wallace wanting to get back at UA administrators for not supporting his grandstanding more). The only reason they’re FBS in football is to justify Birmingham ambition to have sports venues.

yeah im sure it had nothing to do with birmingham being the major city of the state and tuscaloosa being a little town. just politicians conspiring to pretend those things are true. very sound logic here.

if ifs and buts were candy and nuts...

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:39 pm to
'redstone arsenal' isnt a single employer. there are more ppl there but you've got army personnel, contractors, boeing, etc.

uab as a singular entity has more employees; redstone arsenal a higher headcount across the various entities opearting there.

it's really beside the point of the being made. this asinine idea that uab is leaching off of 'alabama' bc they have a football team. uab is by any measure a massive essential part of the ua system.

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 5:26 pm to
i mean uab brings in more revenue on its own than the campus in tuscaloosa. they're also the largest employer in the state. seems objectively important.

re: UAB athletics tolerance

Posted by Fleurs on 8/13/26 at 4:34 pm to
thats not how any of this works
quote:

Per the article, this group would have no say in any type of athletic department decision.

Awwww. I'm gonna hold your hand when i tell you this...
quote:

lsu is looking at private equity...
absolutely shameful
quote:

LOL @ people throwing shade. My guess is something that’s already been suggested by others such as private equity investment like Big1G proposed or the University of Utah has already done.
Cant think of a more legitimate reason to throw shade.

Completely indensible, should be illegal.
Woe to the program who invites this into their house, an unequivocal enemy of the sport.
yeah i mean everybody thinks it doesn't work on themself we all think we're special, etc., but as a matter of routine 101 level human psychology, it 100% does. of course that doesnt mean every ad works on you, but the idea you're immune to the immense amount of advertising you're subjected to is a common delusion.

which, going back to the original point, is of course exactly why the companies spend so much of their money on it, because they know beyond any shadow of a doubt that it does.
quote:

but it doesn’t work on me
(yes it does)

re: NIT aka Auburn check in

Posted by Fleurs on 3/15/26 at 9:12 pm to
they believe in auburn, and love it. you wouldn’t understand.

re: NIT aka Auburn check in

Posted by Fleurs on 3/15/26 at 8:58 pm to
the auburn family need to show up for these games. they owe bruce that.

re: Dont decline the nit bid, auburn

Posted by Fleurs on 3/15/26 at 8:57 pm to
now they know what total bliss is like, it’s hosting it’s hosting yeah

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.