Started By
Message

What's the draw toward "black jerseys?"

Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:11 am
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:11 am
I mean there is nothing historical geared toward wearing them? I would think a push toward silver helmets and silver britches would be more inline with historical relevance.

Is there something I'm missing here?

IMO they look like crappy Falcon uniforms when I see them, at least they didn't break out the Grambling helmet scheme.
Posted by BreezyDawg
Trembling Earth
Member since Dec 2016
3320 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:17 am to
Done right, it creates a excitement and a crazy atmosphere.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39967 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:42 am to
I dig em. I'd like to see them one SEC game a year.
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7897 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:43 am to
The old ones were cool looking. The black jerseys offset the red helmet nicely.

The new ones are terrible, which I'm pretty sure they did on purpose so we would stop asking about them. Kind of a genius move if you ask me because I never want to see those god awful things again. I'm red forever now.
Posted by claydawg09
Covington
Member since Sep 2013
1804 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:54 am to
The old version that is literally just our red jerseys in black with the colors reversing is fantastic. Last night was some new wave goofed up version. But to answer your “why” questions:

A) Black is one of our 3 primary colors
B) Silver helmets may sound good on paper but in reality we’d just look like Ohio State
C) Our silver britches have been shite for years. I don’t know what the issue is but I miss the early 2000s when there was actually a silver shine to them and not just a flat gray.
D) Recruits and players like them. Most schools around the country have at least one alternate jersey they use regularly with the exception of Bama, Auburn, USC, and Penn State and maybe a couple more. It’s not sacrilege.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49226 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 8:54 am to
They look nice as frick, fans love them, players love them, and recruits love them.

Only people who seem to hate them are older fans who hate change aka traditionalists
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
9829 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:09 am to
Because they look great. /thread
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12413 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I mean there is nothing historical geared toward wearing them? I would think a push toward silver helmets and silver britches would be more inline with historical relevance.

Is there something I'm missing here?

IMO they look like crappy Falcon uniforms when I see them, at least they didn't break out the Grambling helmet scheme.


Historically, Im pretty sure that Frank Sinkwich’s Heisman portrait is him in a black jersey with a red helmet.
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2788 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:41 am to
These were to celebrate 100 years of being called Bulldogs. So the dog collar and the dawgs on the sleeves were a 1 off. The regular black jerseys should be wore on SR day every year. No gimmicks make it a tradition.
This post was edited on 11/22/20 at 9:42 am
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14158 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:43 am to
Because black is cool and edgy.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:54 am to
They look cool, and not everything has to be historical.
Posted by ThereGoesHerschel
Member since May 2011
882 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:55 am to
quote:

there is nothing historical geared toward wearing them? I would think a push toward silver helmets and silver britches would be more inline with historical relevance.

Is there something I'm missing here?


Yes. You're missing the fact that a different color jersey top isn't required to be historically significant.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12413 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:56 am to
But they are historically significant
Posted by ThereGoesHerschel
Member since May 2011
882 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 10:00 am to
Despite being photographed in a black top idk if there's any evidence we actually wore blaxj in a game back then, could be wrong though.

Beside the point though. The point is, there isn't some prerequisite check box to be fulfilled for wearing a different jersey than what you normally wear.
Posted by SneakyWaff1es
Member since Nov 2012
3939 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 10:07 am to
You every think about fricking a hot chick that's not your wife? Something that wouldn't be historically significant...that bitch just looks good.

It's like that only your "historic" uniform won't take half your shite in the divorce.
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Digging back far enough, there is evidence of Georgia Bulldogs black jerseys in the 1940s. Sometime between 1940 and 1942, members of the Georgia football team wore black jerseys for a photoshoot at Sanford Stadium. Sinkwich, the Heisman Trophy winner from 1942, was one of those players and he even posed for one photo alongside head coach Wally Butts. What was the point of this photoshoot with black jerseys? There's no photographic evidence to suggest the Bulldogs ever wore the jerseys in a game. The late Dan Magill, who knew everything there was to know about Georgia football, had no recollection of the team ever wearing black jerseys. One possibility is that the photo shoot was nothing more than that. Butts didn't create his Georgia football style in his first season (1939). He introduced the "silver britches" in 1940 and the silver helmets in 1941. Perhaps Butts considered black jerseys and bought a small set so he could see the full uniform in person. If so, then the black jerseys have truly come full circle. In 1940, the jerseys were used for a photoshoot featuring star players. In 2020, black jerseys are typically used for photoshoots featuring coveted high-school recruits.




LINK

Too bad they didn't choose the same style shirts as Franks instead of the abomination they wore last night....

As I said I don't quite understand it, but then I guess nobody's getting hurt by it either.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27291 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 11:38 am to
quote:

As I said I don't quite understand it,


whats so difficult to understand?

Black is a official school color and been part part of our uniform for decades. The jersey looked great last night except for the dog collar pattern but it was barely visible
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Only people who seem to hate them are older fans who hate change aka traditionalists


I am definitely older and definitely a traditionalist....but I love the black jerseys. As one poster said above, they offset the red helmets nicely.

Posted by ThereGoesHerschel
Member since May 2011
882 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 11:47 am to
quote:

then I guess nobody's getting hurt by it either.



Except you, apparently
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 11/22/20 at 1:07 pm to
Who's alter are you with those 300+ posts in 9 years?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter