Started By
Message
re: AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:57 pm to Texas Weazel
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:57 pm to Texas Weazel
You are seriously putting the cart before the horse
1
Posted on 9/8/23 at 6:25 am to Texas Weazel
quote:
In the long run, they won't. The Big12 doesn't have that anchor school anymore that attracts viewers or gives them legitimacy.
BYU pulls them the Utah Market, that might be one of the only ones
Posted on 9/8/23 at 2:15 pm to Old Sarge
Possibly.
But IMO some reference conference realignment has been knee jerk reactions rather than strategical additions (especially the Big12). A team only being valuable when they're good is a recipe for possible TV Ratings disaster. Do you really want to bet on those schools sustaining perpetual success? What is going to happen when Cincinnati or TCU eventually hit an era with losing records? You really think people will watch like they do now?
Like I said earlier, schools like ours, Texas, Florida, Michigan State, and UCLA have sucked tremendously over the past decade. Yet all these schools can still draw an audience. If UCF or Cincinnati sucked as much as the schools above did over the past decade, they'd be viewed no different than USF, Fresno State, or Toledo.
I think networks are being weary and this is why they've given the Big12 a short term contract. They're waiting to see how the Big12 performs on TV without any blue blood schools. Will people really tune in to watch Big12 football over SEC/BigTen football? You think UCF vs CoogHigh/TTU/Baylor/TCU will outdraw Florida vs A&M/Texas?
But IMO some reference conference realignment has been knee jerk reactions rather than strategical additions (especially the Big12). A team only being valuable when they're good is a recipe for possible TV Ratings disaster. Do you really want to bet on those schools sustaining perpetual success? What is going to happen when Cincinnati or TCU eventually hit an era with losing records? You really think people will watch like they do now?
Like I said earlier, schools like ours, Texas, Florida, Michigan State, and UCLA have sucked tremendously over the past decade. Yet all these schools can still draw an audience. If UCF or Cincinnati sucked as much as the schools above did over the past decade, they'd be viewed no different than USF, Fresno State, or Toledo.
I think networks are being weary and this is why they've given the Big12 a short term contract. They're waiting to see how the Big12 performs on TV without any blue blood schools. Will people really tune in to watch Big12 football over SEC/BigTen football? You think UCF vs CoogHigh/TTU/Baylor/TCU will outdraw Florida vs A&M/Texas?
Posted on 9/23/23 at 4:32 pm to Texas Weazel
Today marks that rare day that I actually want Baylor to win a game.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 5:02 pm to Texas Weazel
If the Big 12 hadn’t added those teams they’d have had zero stability and they’d be the ones who got picked apart rather than the Pac 12.
This post was edited on 9/23/23 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:44 pm to Pvt Hudson
quote:
Today marks that rare day that I actually want Baylor to win a game.
Well, they got blasted to the sun tonight so...
How fricking poetic for this to be the last game of the tu-Baylor series and Baylor doesn't score a touchdown
Page 19 of 19
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News