Started By
Message
re: Wish we’d picked Texas to join the SEC
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:28 pm to cardboardboxer
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:28 pm to cardboardboxer
You’re too kind sir.
Thank you and happy new year!
Thank you and happy new year!
1
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:29 pm to Philippines4LSU
You too!!
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:30 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Shut the frick up you California ****.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:34 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:I would rather have UNC, NC State or Va Tech than Missouri.
I’m happy we got the schools we did when we expanded.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:34 pm to Herman Frisco
quote:
Texas would tear the sec up and put it of business within 10years.
Awww the REC is scared how cute
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:44 pm to Herman Frisco
Ditto!!!
Texas destroyed the SWC and the B12 and that's why Mizzou, Texas A&M, Colorado and Nebraska left the B12. They would want to replace the SEC Network with the Longhorn Network. They would also try to be the ones to determine how much money each school will get from the Longhorn Network.(There would be no more SEC Network)
Texas destroyed the SWC and the B12 and that's why Mizzou, Texas A&M, Colorado and Nebraska left the B12. They would want to replace the SEC Network with the Longhorn Network. They would also try to be the ones to determine how much money each school will get from the Longhorn Network.(There would be no more SEC Network)
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:47 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
As opposed to the gender neutral flaming cupcakes.
OP you have it bass ackwards. Aggies decided we wanted to join the SEC. We are in the position of having adequate academic credentials to join any conference we want.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:53 pm to ArkLaTexTiger
quote:
I would rather have UNC, NC State or Va Tech than Missouri
Everyone wants to be in the SEC. The conference could have had any schools they wanted with a handful of exceptions, notably the B1G and PAC schools.
We could’ve had any of those you listed, plus most if not all Big 12-2 schools. Hard to second guess the decision to go with A&M and Mizzou given that post-expansion, the SEC has seen unprecedented levels of both financial and on-the-field/court success.
The people who are paid to study this stuff and make recommendations obviously did some calculations that turned out to be spot-on.
We got the right two schools. The TV contacts speak for themselves.
The professionals and experts tasked with identifying the ideal candidates chose the right ones. Fan opinions don’t matter when the conference is experiencing historical success in so many different ways.
Be grateful for their contributions and stop complaining. I’d be hard-pressed to find any possible scenario that would have produced better results than we’re seeing now.
This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:00 pm to cardboardboxer
We wouldn't want to join you guys.
We'd like you guys to somehow piss off Arkansas and LSU so they'd come join us.
We'd like you guys to somehow piss off Arkansas and LSU so they'd come join us.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:10 pm to Philippines4LSU
Adding Mizzou and A&M to the SEC increased its population footprint by 50%. Two programs, 50%. And the contract for TV more than doubled.
That means the SEC made perfect decisions based on data we will never see.
That means the SEC made perfect decisions based on data we will never see.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:25 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:
Everyone wants to be in the SEC
Yet you brought home aggy & mizzou?
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:35 pm to OldSchoolHorn
The longhorns are not a valued or wanted commodity anymore. The secret is out, deal with it.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:39 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
Yet you brought home aggy & mizzou?
Heh.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:42 pm to Mizzou4ever
quote:
The longhorns are not a valued or wanted commodity anymore. The secret is out, deal with it.
We know we're valuable.
Don't really care if we're wanted.
Especially don't care if we aren't wanted by anyone with a huge chip on their shoulder.
This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:59 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:
I get that it’s fun to troll, but if we’re being serious, given a choice between the two, I take A&M 100/100 times.
Given any choice out west. I’d have taken Oklahoma.
And Missouri is an even bigger joke than aggy.
The sec is administering cash infusion CPR to Mizz and they still don’t care about football.
Don’t even try to explain to me how this fox got into the henhouse. It had to be absolute moonshot or something huge fell though.
This post was edited on 1/1/20 at 12:02 am
Posted on 1/1/20 at 12:08 am to siliconvalleytiger
Are you talking bout Mizzou or Arkansa?? Them flamin cup cakes
Posted on 1/1/20 at 12:10 am to Mizzou4ever
quote:
The longhorns are not a valued or wanted commodity anymore. The secret is out, deal with it.
Despite A&M being very respectable brand .. Each of you combined are barely worth half of Texas’ value.
In other words Texas is ten times more valuable than Missouri.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 12:10 am to siliconvalleytiger
quote:I agree because all we did is invite more Bama fans into the league with A&M. Atleast Texas fans would stand on their own even if their team sucked.
Wish we’d picked Texas to join the SEC
This post was edited on 1/1/20 at 12:11 am
Posted on 1/1/20 at 12:16 am to OldSchoolHorn
The SEC doesn't want your lame arse when they already have a footprint in Texas. Mizzou is a fairly big state with over 6 million people, again, another footprint in a populace state. You would never get in anyways because you wouldn't have the votes.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 12:22 am to Mizzou4ever
Who cares. Get thee to thy safe space.
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News