Philippines4LSU

Hey BoarEd, check this out: LINK

Object doesn’t appear until 0:12 mark, but watch until the end. It’s only 0:32.

I personally filmed that in March of 2007 in Covington, LA. Saw it 15 straight nights & filmed the video on a Blackberry. Then-roommate witnessed it too.

I published it for the first time recently because if it was military I didn’t want to put state secrets online for all to see. Enough time has passed that if my theory is correct, Russia, China & others have almost certainly stolen (illegally purchased) the technology by now.

Also, thanks for turning me on to Q. I was supposed to be involved with that way sooner but had tuned out and lost track of time.

Maybe one day I’ll tell you the story about when & how I first got involved with the operation (it was long before 2017).

If you email me, I have some intel that may be of interest to you. I don’t want to put it out here publicly b/c of the nature of this board, plus it’s only supposed to be shared with select people. Since you reminded me about my obligations re: Q, I feel like you deserve to at least have the option to learn what I was told & decide for yourself if you want to proceed.

My fricking business partner is such a GD idiot.

A vendor with whom we do a lot of business and from whom we buy several of our bestselling products called yesterday to offer us an opportunity to buy what’s left of remaining quantities of some of our core products before calling other customers. He told us how much he had remaining (a 15 month supply at current sales rates for a product which won’t expire for nearly 3 years.

He went on to explain that the disruption in global shipping and supply chains caused by the virus - whether legitimate or not - would prevent his company from being able to produce any more for 9 months in his best case scenario, likely more like 12 or more z.

If we bought all he had less, we’d sell it all before it expired even at current sales figures which have only grown significantly every month since we began to stock it (my idea).

More importantly, we’d ensure that our competition had none and would have none for several months to a year at the least. If we’re the only company who has it, eventually all global buyers will find their way to us via the internet while much competition would never bother restocking once available again.

The idiot vetoed my purchase attempt pending a meeting later in the week.

The last time I deployed this strategy (that vendor was ceasing production indefinitely to settle a legal dispute among ownership), we had the product when no one else did, got the #1 and #2 spots overall result in Google results (and 6 of the top 10 results including our feeder sites), and never surrendered the first page SERP (search engine results page) domination for four years after the dispute was resolved and production restored.

Now we have a chance to legally monopolize supply for the product and my idiot business partner is wasting valuable time. I can’t wait for 2022 to arrive when my stake will increase to above 50% and I won’t have to deal with this BS ever again. :banghead:

1. Looters (Gov’t, bureaucrats, lawyers, etc
2. Moochers (those in your 1-3)


Maybe not proof but I’d go with my list personally,

Maybe Chris had a moment of clarity and refused to read what he knew without a doubt was 100% propaganda?

This seems to be standard discipline for those aligned with the DS and the Left when they step out of line.

I wonder if there’s any motivation behind this that is completely unrelated to what was reported. Maybe not, but it sure wouldn’t surprise me if there is.

A black friend I’ve been (relatively) close with for nearly 25 years has a steady job for the first time since I’ve known him, and has for the past 18 months. He’s even developing (legit) side-businesses. This is a guy who was shady much of his life and did time for selling drugs. But he’s working 40+/week at a job he likes, supporting his family better than he ever did the other way.

He hates Trump. Has no idea why.

I’m going to have a talk with him before November and he’ll make the right choice for America (if he can’t vote due to record, I’ll convince him to convince family and friends). If he is eloquent enough in explaining it to his family or wherever was feeding him the BS he’d spout off to me that was so far from reality that I just declined to offer any reply. I changed the topic to sports, just wasn’t feeling up to it that day.

I’m in a good position right now to not just sway his voting preferences by exposing him
to truth and exposing lies on TV and in papers. I’m actually really good at that — explaining political realities in general, like scary good. If I were a politician I’d be afraid of myself ever rising to top office.

I’m gonna get involved this cycle and do my part to make sure Trump wins the black vote in my district this November (he’ll win LA anyway, end game is to help Trump to turn them
Anti-Democrat by exposing them to actual democrat policy and Trump’s record in contrast to dem policy.

I’ve become close with everyone from the street dealer to the preacher in that community. They’re still anti-Trump (mostly), but I personally like my odds. Plan is to get a couple in each sub-demographic to buy in and spread the message.

I can’t make this following statement because even though in demographic terms (looking only at numbers, past strategies and past results) the statement is 100% true, the strategy will work for the exact reasons I can’t say, and even though people of all races study this stuff for a living, if I said it my comments would be forever (intentionally and intellectually dishonestly) distorted and misconstrued. The statement has to do with Machismo and getting people within the community to spread the good message. It assumes those spreading the message are persuaded to do so via one-on-one conversations that respectfully plant seeds of thought that grow into people whose brains have been liberated. Draw your own conclusions about the redacted statement.

quote:

---

He'll be on the Supreme Court by then, for life.

---

I’d be happy with that so long as it doesn’t come at the expense of the White House.

quote:

---

would like to see laws have a 20-30 year sunset so that successive generations can decide if they want to keep them.

Just like our antique 1916 Tax Code. Just suppose it expired every 30 years unless Congress voted to continue it.

The way it is now, we are governed by a system set in place by people who have been dead 100 years because Congress doesn't have the political will to debate whether that system is still viable.

Sunset provisions would force that examination and stoke contemporary public involvement.

---

+1

That, or at least some variation (given how specific your point was) would work just fine for me.

quote:

---

brokered convention expected

---

So it’ll be Trump v Hillary again?

quote:

---

would love to see Cardinal Sarah become Pope. It is time for an African pope.

---

I’d be happy with any non-Jesuit, non-communist, non-globalist Pope. The prophesies of Saint Malachy have the current pope being the last pope — ever.

Pope John Paul I was murdered by Jesuits the night before he was to issue a declaration that the Jesuit order must perform a complete 180, abandon all current beliefs and return to Catholic teachings and immediately cease aiding and abetting Marxists, or else he would disband the entire order of The Society of Jesus and excommunicate any members who remained loyal to Jesuit teachings and/or politics.

Close advisor to Pope John XXIII, and former Jesuit Priest Malachi Martin believed that to be the case anyway. Being familiar with Martin’s writings and interviews, he is quite credible IMHO. Martin left the order because he was appalled by “liberation theology,” which is what Jesuits call the Satanic philosophy better known as Secular Humanism.

quote:

---

Here is another quote from Jesuit author Malachi Martin:

"On the basis of Paul VI's critical dossier, and with the help of a very experienced old Jesuit, Father Paolo Dezza, who had been Confessor to Pope Paul VI and now was John Paul I's confessor, the Pope composed a hard-hitting speech of warning. He planned to deliver it to the international assembly of Jesuit leaders and Father General Arrupe at another of their General Congregations to be held in Rome on September 30, 1978.

One of the striking features of his speech was John Paul I's repeated reference to doctrinal deviations on the part of Jesuits. "Let it not happen that the teachings and publications of Jesuits contain anything to cause confusion among the faithful." Doctrinal deviation was for him the most ominous symptom of Jesuit failure.

Veiled beneath the polished veneer of its graceful romanita, that speech contained a clear threat: the Society would return to its proper and assigned role, or the Pope would be forced to take action. What action? From John Paul's memoranda and notes, it is clear that, unless a speedy reform of the Order proved feasible, he had in mind the effective liquidation of the Society of Jesus as it is today—perhaps to be reconstituted later in a more manageable form.

John Paul I had received the petitions of many Jesuits, pleading with him to do just that. The Pope never delivered that speech of warning. On the morning of September 29, after thirty-three days on the Throne of Peter, and one day before he was to address the Society's General Congregation, John Paul I was found dead in bed." (Martin, The Jesuits, p. 44). LINK

---

So the night before he was to issue an ultimatum to the Jesuits that they abandon Satanic philosophies and Marxists ideals, their entire order would be disbanded with all who were loyal to the order excommunicated, he “just happened” to die.

Now we have a Jesuit Pope, and an accurate (to date) prophetic list of Popes ends with the current one. The one belonging to an order that preaches Satanism and Marxism as it’s two primary tenets.

So yeah, any Pope beyond the current one who isn’t another Jesuit or the Antichrist would be a win in my book.


ETA: Pope John Paul II was shot three different times at point blank range. Some believe Jesuits were responsible for one or more of those shootings, although the Soviets were blamed by most at the time. The irony is that the Jesuits and Soviets were one in the same, with Russia having provided them safe haven the first time their order was expelled from the Church. This is likely where they adopted communist and specifically Marxist ideology.

I’m 100% against abortion, and I’m all for disregarding laws that serve no purpose (or only a corrupt purpose), as well as laws that are just stupid.

I wish lawmakers at state and federal levels had to repeal a certain percentage of all new laws created during a legislative session. There are way too many fricking laws.

Not all laws are equal. The law against murder is a pretty important one. That is God’s law, and IMHO, man has no authority to make exceptions to it.