Started By
Message
re: Will the SEC championship come down to Bama and LSU again?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:25 pm to StrickAggie06
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:25 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
because you upset us
0
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:25 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
Maybe you should go back and watch the game again. The Mike Evans drop is clear as day and Sumlin said straight up that one of the other INTs was due to Thomas Johnson running the wrong route stem, which is also obvious if you go back and watch. The end of the game lateral bullshite is exactly that. So if you count the bad decision by Johnny as forced, you forced 2 out of 5 turnovers, but got 14 points out of the 3 that weren't. FACTS.
Well done! Those are facts! However, claiming aTm would have won the game without the turnovers and the they "gifted" 4 of them are OPINIONS. Do you see the difference?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:25 pm to cas4t
Bama proved that they would break tendencies. That is one of the things Saban has done for years. Set up a tendency and then strategically break them to mind frick his opponents.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:27 pm to gatordmb89
The man is a strategic genius. I wish he'd fricking retire already.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:29 pm to RB10
quote:
OK lets go back to grade school really quick.
A fact is something that is PROVEN to be true, while an opinion is something one BELIEVES to be true.
Some examples:
LSU forced 5 turnovers in the game against aTm. This is a fact.
LSU won the game. This is also a fact.
StrickAggie06 says IF Aggie hadn't lost 5 turnovers they would have won the game. This is an opinion.
StrickAggie06 says 4 of the turnover were "gifted". This is also an opinion.
Do you get it?
See the problem is that you are confused. Let me help.
A&M yielded 5 turnovers in the game against LSU. This is a fact.
LSU won the game. This is also a fact.
Of those 5 turnovers, at most 2 were forced by LSU's defense, as it is without question that A&M gave up 3 due to their own mistakes and not play by the LSU defense. This is also a fact.
So the statement: LSU forced 5 turnovers in the game against aTm, is not a fact, it is FALSE.
quote:
StrickAggie06 says 4 of the turnover were "gifted". This is also an opinion.
True this is actually an opinion because there is some debate as to whether or not one of Johnny's INTs was forced or not. IMO, it was. However, the other 3 TOs were "gifted" without question. Not opinion. Facts backed up by film and the coaches.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:30 pm to AlaTiger
quote:And we were a fumble in the red-zone and a two-point conversion away from being undefeated in the regular season.
LSU was a 3rd down conversion away from playing for the SEC title against Georgia. Win that and they play for the National Championship and destroy Notre Dame just like Georgia would have.
What's your point?
The LSU-Alabama game did not decide the SEC last season. Get over it.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:32 pm to StrickAggie06
Bbb bbb bbuutt Coach said he ran the wrong route!!!!! WE SHOULD OF WON 
aTm dude, your embarrassing yourself. We pwned ur douchy little QB at noon in College Station. I expect nothing different next year, esp considering how serious ur QB is taking the offseason.
I love when LSU is over looked. And yes, the SEC champion will be the winner of the SEC West, again.
aTm dude, your embarrassing yourself. We pwned ur douchy little QB at noon in College Station. I expect nothing different next year, esp considering how serious ur QB is taking the offseason.
I love when LSU is over looked. And yes, the SEC champion will be the winner of the SEC West, again.
This post was edited on 4/11/13 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:33 pm to cas4t
quote:
Holy fricking frick. LSU DID NOT DOMINATE. Better?
Yes.
quote:
However, claiming aTm would have won the game without the turnovers and the they "gifted" 4 of them are OPINIONS. Do you see the difference?
Fine. It is my OPINION that without the 3 for sure gifted turnovers, we would have won. Considering 14 points came off of that, and the fact that the LSU offense wasn't doing shite until we started turning it over, I'm inclined to think it's a good opinion.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:34 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
So the statement: LSU forced 5 turnovers in the game against aTm, is not a fact, it is FALSE.
I'm pretty sure under the official stats there is only one column for turnovers. It isn't forced and received. It's just turnovers. So officially, and therefore a fact, is that LSU forced 5 turnovers in the game. Your, and possibly others, opinion is that aTm had 3 "unforced" turnovers. Now are you grasping the concept yet?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:35 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
Fine. It is my OPINION that without the 3 for sure gifted turnovers, we would have won. Considering 14 points came off of that, and the fact that the LSU offense wasn't doing shite until we started turning it over, I'm inclined to think it's a good opinion.
It is a very good opinion and I agree Aggie probably would have won without them, but it's still an opinion bro.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:36 pm to GatorsGators
quote:
The LSU-Alabama game did not decide the SEC last season. Get over it.
For the record, this was the ONLY point I was trying to make before LSU fans decided to preach their domination of A&M to me.
quote:
aTm dude, your embarrassing yourself. We pwned ur douchy little QB at noon in College Station. I expect nothing different next year, esp considering how serious ur QB is taking the offseason.
Thank you for bringing to your amazing insight to the conversation. We're definitely all more intelligent for having read it.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:37 pm to RB10
LSU's defense was better than JFF that day. That is why LSU won. Big deal.
See yall in Baton Rouge.
See yall in Baton Rouge.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:37 pm to hubertcumberdale
And LSU played their worst game offensively vs UF. Our oline was decimated and we could not move the ball for shite and when we finally did, we fumbled. We caught UF and the absolutely wrong time. If we play them later in the season we would of won. After the UGA game UF went to shite, mainly due to injuries sustained in the early part of the season. What seperates LSU is our ability to coach young players to succeed in games on short notice. Remember how much better our Oline was vs USCe a week after UF game? They didnt have much of a problem with Clowney considering our Oline had 7 combined starts that game
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:38 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
The LSU-Alabama game did not decide the SEC last season.
Actually, it kinda did decide the west. If we had held on and won, we would have gone to Atlanta.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:40 pm to RB10
quote:
I'm pretty sure under the official stats there is only one column for turnovers. It isn't forced and received. It's just turnovers. So officially, and therefore a fact, is that LSU forced 5 turnovers in the game. Your, and possibly others, opinion is that aTm had 3 "unforced" turnovers. Now are you grasping the concept yet?
Not that I want to continue to drag this out, but that's sort of my point as well. The column just says "turnovers", it doesn't say "forced turnovers" as it includes both. So it's not a fact that LSU forced 5 turnovers, only that there were 5 "total" turnovers by A&M. You see my point?
quote:
It is a very good opinion and I agree Aggie probably would have won without them, but it's still an opinion bro.
Agreed.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:40 pm to StrickAggie06
Dude you are really embarrassing yourself. Other aggies aren't even showing up to defend you.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:42 pm to GatorsGators
quote:
The LSU-Alabama game did not decide the SEC last season. Get over it.
It clearly decided the west. Which easily could have decided the SEC.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:42 pm to StrickAggie06
ATM's offense was not doing shite in the 2nd half, either.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:43 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
Not that I want to continue to drag this out, but that's sort of my point as well. The column just says "turnovers", it doesn't say "forced turnovers" as it includes both. So it's not a fact that LSU forced 5 turnovers, only that there were 5 "total" turnovers by A&M. You see my point?
Yeah I can see where you were coming from.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:43 pm to wadewilson
quote:And Georgia would have gone to Miami to dominate Notre Dame.
Actually, it kinda did decide the west. If we had held on and won, we would have gone to Atlanta.
Page 13 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News