Started By
Message
re: Why was LSU football so bad in the '90s?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:14 pm to 3down10
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:14 pm to 3down10
Saban made demands at LSU . Those demands were met. Prior to that it was to one degree or another Good Ol Boy status quo football. LSU has a GREAT football culture, it was pervasive and rabid. LSU also had some sporadically really, really good teams that couldn’t quite close the deal, but was never a great football PROGRAM. Saban built facilities and raised expectations- changed it from an annual team to a program.
Miles, for all he got correct, lost the script from a resources standpoint. He didn’t innovate and keep the competitive edge and Alabama pulled away as a program. It was more than Xs and Os. All the little things that matter.
O has taken it all to a much higher level than Miles from a program perspective. What O wants, O gets. Analysts, facilities, budgets, it’s all there now. He has committed to being the most innovative and analytics- driven program in cfb and it shows.
Miles, for all he got correct, lost the script from a resources standpoint. He didn’t innovate and keep the competitive edge and Alabama pulled away as a program. It was more than Xs and Os. All the little things that matter.
O has taken it all to a much higher level than Miles from a program perspective. What O wants, O gets. Analysts, facilities, budgets, it’s all there now. He has committed to being the most innovative and analytics- driven program in cfb and it shows.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:22 pm to cramps
Has A&M finished in the top 5 since WW2? Yall hate Sumlin, but he was your best coach since then.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:25 pm to michael corleone
Curly wasn’t that great a recruiter at all. He burned recruiting bridges in North Louisiana that took years to rebuild.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:41 pm to Mithridates6
Okay, Bert.
2012 was one, thanks to Sherman's recruits. I don't hate Sumlin, either. He did some things well, just not a lot.

2012 was one, thanks to Sherman's recruits. I don't hate Sumlin, either. He did some things well, just not a lot.
This post was edited on 5/5/20 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 5/5/20 at 6:02 pm to Scoob
Arkansas was the same in that they won the SWC twice a decade. We also finished ranked in the top 20 just a bout each year. If a coach finished with less than nine wins and can't beat Texas then the seat was getting hot.
Our problem is that Frank Broyles stayed way too long and should have let Terry Don Phillips be his replacement, you know the one who hired Dabo Swinney. But instead we got stuck with Jeff Long who got us Bert, John L Smith and Bobby Petrino. Yes that sounds strange that I would include him but a prime Frank Broyles would not have hired him. Why? Because Frank had the uncanny ability to see weakness or trouble prone coaches.
After the 1989 year, the declined started and we have never recovered since then. Ken Hatfield was run out of Fayetteville and yet he was doing nothing more than winning the SWC and playing in major bowls. But the offense was boring and he couldn't win the big games according to many fans. Well when you play elite teams such as Oklahoma or Miami, what do you expect?
Our football program is dead. It was killed by Bert and Jeff Long. Then the Chad came and incinerated the body. Hunter Yuracheck was hired and had some personality traits that were similar to a young Frank Broyles. Just like Frank, he had high expectations for coaches even telling Eric Musselman after his first win that this better be the first of many wins.
So like anything else. Hire a bad AD and they will hire a bad coach. You get worse until they end up like us. It is that simple and everything else is a bad excuse as to why it can't be done.
Our problem is that Frank Broyles stayed way too long and should have let Terry Don Phillips be his replacement, you know the one who hired Dabo Swinney. But instead we got stuck with Jeff Long who got us Bert, John L Smith and Bobby Petrino. Yes that sounds strange that I would include him but a prime Frank Broyles would not have hired him. Why? Because Frank had the uncanny ability to see weakness or trouble prone coaches.
After the 1989 year, the declined started and we have never recovered since then. Ken Hatfield was run out of Fayetteville and yet he was doing nothing more than winning the SWC and playing in major bowls. But the offense was boring and he couldn't win the big games according to many fans. Well when you play elite teams such as Oklahoma or Miami, what do you expect?
Our football program is dead. It was killed by Bert and Jeff Long. Then the Chad came and incinerated the body. Hunter Yuracheck was hired and had some personality traits that were similar to a young Frank Broyles. Just like Frank, he had high expectations for coaches even telling Eric Musselman after his first win that this better be the first of many wins.
So like anything else. Hire a bad AD and they will hire a bad coach. You get worse until they end up like us. It is that simple and everything else is a bad excuse as to why it can't be done.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 6:05 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
quote:
But it was the stinking sips who were behind all the sanctions. NCAA was the puppet and the sips always pulling the strings.
quote:
Anytime a team rose up to rival the sips on the field, they got the NCAA involved
quote:
Ever hear of the sips getting probation? Me neither
Wow. Hat trick.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the "Burnt Orange Media Conspiracy" and the inferiority complex of A&M fans when talking about Texas, here are three perfect examples.
But you know, it's those big meanie sips in Austin "pulling the strings". LOL are you kidding me? Do you have any idea how much of a baby you sound like with that excuse, with no proof behind those claims might I add?
Ridiculous
If that was not enough to prove anything then what about why did Texas A&M, Missouri, Nebraska, and Colorado leave the Big 12? So it has nothing to do with Texas doing things their way to keep the others down or find a way to get out of the Big 12.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 6:14 pm to dchog
Arkansas still leads the series with A&M by a considerable margin even after losing the last 8, so I'd say yall are a much better program for than A&M historically. Maybe if both Ark and UT had been strong in the early 90s the SWC would've been in a position of strength with the Big Eight. The Hogs have had higher highs and lower lows than the Aggy since the SWC.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 7:40 pm to Mithridates6
Both schools have similar histories. A&M has the advantage these last eight years as they have played the worst razorback teams since the 50s and 40s.
Arkansas was never going to cooperate with Texas or any Texas school as Arkansas was treated as an outsider. So the destruction of the SWC was inevitable. Arkansas was blamed for it's failure but it was the only school besides Rice that wasn't on probation.
Arkansas was never going to cooperate with Texas or any Texas school as Arkansas was treated as an outsider. So the destruction of the SWC was inevitable. Arkansas was blamed for it's failure but it was the only school besides Rice that wasn't on probation.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 8:09 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
I don't know what Tulane, the team that has more SEC championships than A&M has played for, has anything to do with it. But regardless, I'm sure they'd agree that we wouldn't need to "educate" you if you weren't so willfully blind to your schools glaring lack of success and delusional to the point that you think A&M's on par with the football programs whose fans you're attempting to argue.
Key word "attempting" in that last sentence
Can't take the shite you dish out. So weak. Not sure who ever commented that A&M is on anyone's level, but you have some brain malfunction telling you that aggy can't talk shite back. Wake up, son. Now go kick rocks.

Posted on 5/5/20 at 8:38 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:we've got a live one here!
Wrong right out of the gate
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:04 pm to 3down10
quote:my word you are ignorant. lsu was 13th all time in wins BEFORE saban got to lsu. if lsu was "mediocre" what does that make everyone else from 14 on down?
That's a history of mediocrity
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:09 pm to cramps
quote:aggies still lying about this
i just thought it was unfortunate y'all broke the agreement
here comes the links to old articles
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:13 pm to Mithridates6
quote:this quite often goes overlooked by the "lsu fb started in 2000" knuckledraggers. especially on defense. saban inherited a pretty darn good roster
Saban inherited a good deal of talent
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:16 pm to Lsupimp
quote:people forget that this happened at EVERY historically great program; nd, army, bama, fsu, texas, tenn, michigan, osu. there was a coach in their history that demanded excellence. after that, the program was able to get good coaches and players and avoid long droughts. occasionally, that didn't work out like with ole miss.
changed it from an annual team to a program
Posted on 5/5/20 at 11:43 pm to tiger perry
quote:Turn LSU around? There wasn't anything to turn around in the 80's. A couple Sugar Bowls and an Orange, back when making those were a huge deal. Arnsparger had LSU poised to become the power they later became under Saban/Miles.
If hired Spurrier would have turned LSU around
quote:Notice how I mentioned Miles? You THINK Spurrier would leave, but Florida wasn't Big 6 yet, they were Kentucky level. 1 SEC title and that was erased.
but would have eventually left for Florida where he played.
If Spurrier had spawned a monster at LSU, he might have stayed a decade or more, and Florida may never have emerged.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 9:26 am to IotaTiger
quote:
Our coach with the most promise was killed in plane crash. Substitutes did not deliver.
That was a full decade earlier. Stovall had a brief peak, Arnsbarger did well, and even Archer did ok to start off but he was the one that let the train run off the tracks at the beginning of the 90’s...
Posted on 5/6/20 at 9:35 am to Scoob
CFB Warehouse had a very comprehensive methodology for ranking the programs historically. Prior to 2000, figuring wins, bowls, championships, etc- it had LSU ranked 14 best in cfb history. Digging into it, it was pretty hard to refute. LSU was always on the cusp, always a threat to beat you in the bowl game, but not quite consistent enough to get over the hump.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 9:36 am
Posted on 5/6/20 at 10:43 am to tkeefer
That's an easy question. Football facilities were close to the worst in the SEC. That made recruiting difficult so the talent level wasn't great. But, kiss of death was the coaching which was worse than the talent.
It's all be rectified now.
It's all be rectified now.
Popular
Back to top
