Started By
Message
Why is Bama and Auburn hardley ever that good in basketball?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:37 pm
I keep thinking, sooner or later, one of them will make a run. Just has not happened.
21
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:37 pm to Bootycall
Auburn will be soon. Get ready, son.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:38 pm to Bootycall
Wrong board and Auburn beat us this year. Not cool.
And you can hardley spell.
And you can hardley spell.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:38 pm to Bootycall
quote:
Why is Bama and Auburn hardley ever that good in basketball?
Is there some reason I'm missing why they *should* be perennially good in basketball?
eta: bama usually is "good" but seldom great. I'm not sure what you would expect from each program. It'd be like asking why kentucky is hardly ever good in football.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:38 pm to Bootycall
Because
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:40 pm to Bootycall
Anytime any sports program is bad is usually the result of poor coaching......
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:41 pm to Bootycall
I don't say much about grammar here, but you butchered that OP. It's actually painful to read.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:41 pm to Bootycall
Define "make a run." Both programs are historically average in the league, but each has had some solid teams with a strong tourney performance. Are you talking about becoming the Kentucky of the West or something?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:42 pm to Bootycall
Very little in-state talent these days.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:43 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
No telling.....we do own a 101-67 record all time vs LSU though.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:43 pm to Bootycall
bama was a wrecking crew in the nit a few years ago
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:45 pm to Bootycall
probably apathy?
Plus both have shown they can put together really good teams. The only reason LSU would have a slightly higher ceiling is its epic NCAA runs and all-time greats.
LSU would be perceived as a completely different program if it weren't for the Lester Earl scandal. LSU would have over 30 ncaa appearances by now
Plus both have shown they can put together really good teams. The only reason LSU would have a slightly higher ceiling is its epic NCAA runs and all-time greats.
LSU would be perceived as a completely different program if it weren't for the Lester Earl scandal. LSU would have over 30 ncaa appearances by now
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:45 pm to bradwds19
That's nice. How many times have yall been to the Final Four? Just curious.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:46 pm to Bootycall
*are
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:46 pm to Rhymenoceros
quote:
Both programs are historically average in the league, but each has had some solid teams with a strong tourney performance.
Alabama has been above average historically. We're 2nd in the SEC in all time wins behind Kentucky.
Auburn has been historically pretty bad, with a few decent teams sprinkled in.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:47 pm to Bootycall
quote:
How many times have yall been to the Final Four? Just curious.
I have been to two myself. Not sure about any other Auburn or Bama fans. They are fun too.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:47 pm to Bootycall
Bama is 2nd in wins in SEC history.
Why du u hardley no history?
Why du u hardley no history?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:48 pm to Bootycall
Auburn was a good program under Cliff Ellis, had some GREAT teams. The BS sanctions we imposed on ourselves really put the program in the tank....
But Bruce is comin...
But Bruce is comin...
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:48 pm to Tuscaloosa
Also 2nd in Tourney championships and 3rd in reg season titles.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:50 pm to Bootycall
Too young to know better or not a student of history? Alabama isn't Kentucky and never will be. But they are second in total program wins in the SEC.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News