Started By
Message
Why does everyone want to bring more strong teams to the SEC?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 7:43 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 7:43 am
It is not good for college football for all the strength to be concentrated in one conference.
13
Posted on 1/2/13 at 7:46 am to CrimsonCoast
Because you touch yourself at night
Posted on 1/2/13 at 7:48 am to CrimsonCoast
I agree, bring in Tulane and ULM
Posted on 1/2/13 at 7:48 am to CrimsonCoast
You scared.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:08 am to Chadaristic
It is if you can squeeze the lesser conferences out of the playoffs and make more money.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:26 am to John Maplethorpe
You mean lesser conferences like the ACC that had a team punk LSU? I love SEC football but the superiority thing is getting old. LSU got beat because of several reasons, one of them being they thought they were too good to be playing Clemson in the Chik-Fil-A bowl. That game was Clemson's NC game and it showed.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:35 am to WifeWentToLSU
Better competition creates tougher teams and championships. It's hard to go unscathed in the modern era anyway, so teams will always beat up on each other.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:40 am to CrimsonCoast
So bama has a tougher schedule
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:42 am to CrimsonCoast
SEC is already tough enough
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:55 am to WifeWentToLSU
quote:
WifeWentToLSU
I'm sorry ... at least she is probably hot and out weighs the fact she likes corndogs so much ... wait if I can be so bold, I bet she gives great head too because of all the practice she has with corndogs. Question do you cover it in mustard to make her feel more comfortable?
Hmmm
might have to find me a LSU girl now
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:55 am to CrimsonCoast
The schools that are seriously being considered in any expansion, with the possible exception of Virginia Tech, aren't "strong teams" in football.
NC State lost to Vandy, Duke fell apart late against a Big East school (Cincy), UNC is on probation, and UVA wasn't bowl eligible IIRC. And even VT needed overtime against Rutgers.
NC State lost to Vandy, Duke fell apart late against a Big East school (Cincy), UNC is on probation, and UVA wasn't bowl eligible IIRC. And even VT needed overtime against Rutgers.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:59 am to WifeWentToLSU
quote:
WifeWentToLSU
Pics of said wife?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 8:59 am to CrimsonCoast
quote:
It is not good for college football for all the strength to be concentrated in one conference.
Must be nice to play Kentucky and Tennessee next year from the East.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 9:01 am to Michael T. Tiger
Posted on 1/2/13 at 9:46 am to CrimsonCoast
I agree. More good teams will make it much harder for Bama to avoid them, but I have faith that the SEC office will take care of them, as always. 
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:20 am to LSUDonMCO
Hell, the only reason the SEC offices are even considering expansion is so they can have two more years of expansion scheduling.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:22 am to CrimsonCoast
quote:
Why does everyone want to bring more strong teams to the SEC?
so they will have to play everyone other than Bama
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:23 am to CrimsonCoast
you sound like a major pussy right now.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:20 am to oklahogjr
quote:
you sound like a major pussy right now.
I'm not thinking of it from an Alabama perspective. I'm looking at it from a college football as a whole perspective.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:22 am to CrimsonCoast
quote:
It is not good for college football for all the strength to be concentrated in one conference.
Why you worried? Bama won't have to play the majority of them anyway....
:i keeeed i keeeeed:
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News