Started By
Message

re: Why did we get rid of the BCS again?

Posted on 11/6/24 at 1:57 pm to
Posted by jthomas666
Member since Jul 2008
475 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 1:57 pm to
They got rid of the BCS because they got a championship game with two SEC teams.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
100000 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 2:07 pm to
Find out what
Posted by AC SLATER
Member since March 2017
Member since Nov 2024
29 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:05 pm to
LOVED the BCS. It took a lot of the politics out of it and ranked you based on how many you won and who you beat.
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
20288 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:10 pm to
If this was the final poll, BYU is a 4 seed and Boise gets in at 12. That's kind of nuts.
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
16881 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Find out what

If Carolina is still worthy of being ranked in the top 25.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 4:14 pm
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4649 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:45 pm to
There was nothing wrong with the BCS as a ranking system. The problem was fitting 3-4 great teams into ONE championship game.

That system would be a great way to select and seed the playoffs.
Posted by TigerScorpion
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2018
1162 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

Because it was fricking retarded.


It’s not like it’s mattered for Ol miss. They didn’t do shite during the BCS years, or since.
Posted by TigerScorpion
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2018
1162 posts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:39 pm to
The only two times that the BCS pissed me off, was 03 when they put Oklahoma in the championship, right after they got beat down in their conference championship. The second was 04 Auburn not getting any love. Add the BCS format to a FOUR TEAM playoff and that fixes both those issues for me.
Posted by Buster83
Member since Aug 2021
4629 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:41 am to
I never have liked the fact that four teams get a bye.
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
7245 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:48 am to
Why did I know that BCS would have LSU ranked higher.

BCS loved the frick out of LSU. Can’t remember them EVER ranking us lower than we thought we deserved… and when a case could be made for other scenarios, we always got the benefit of any doubt.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88613 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Why did we get rid of the BCS again?


I think the BCS had some flaws, especially the early portions of it that included things like MOV, but it mostly worked itself out later. If we kept the final iteration of the BCS and had 4 teams instead of 2 I woulnd't have hated that necessarily.

I do kinda hate that formulas and computers are the ultimate decider though. Sure people are going to claim that that eliminates human bias, but a computer can't think. People unfairly (prior to 11 months ago) criticize the committee but they got it exactly right 100% of the time for 9 years. Last year they completley bothced the shite out of it but prior to that they did their job just as good or better than a computer would
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
19868 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:08 am to
Because you had to be obvious when you manipulated it.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:30 am to
More humans = more bias
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:33 am to
“MOV”?
Posted by Pimphand
Member since Sep 2021
2749 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Because it was fricking retarded.


It worked most years but occasionally would frick up picking the difference between 2/3 in some years

See: 2001 Nebraska
See: 2003 Oklahoma

People would have far fewer grievances now that the field has been expanded plus it would remove the absolute trashfire of a process we had last year where we left an undefeated P5 conference champion out of the CFP (even though yes FSU sucked w/o Jordan Travis and continue to do so)
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88613 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:47 am to
margin of victory

I understand the idea behind it but obviously it's easy to exploit. A top 10 team beating another top 10 team by 14 looks outstanding so you'd want to reward them for that. The problem is that you'd have a highly ranked team playing some unranked sub-.500 scrub then run up the score by 50 just to improve their MOV score.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 10:06 am to
Wouldn’t the formula contain current seeding or record in its calculations to differentiate who’s playing whom?

1 would believe that would be included.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62783 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:29 pm to
I'd rather the computers than humans with hidden agendas
Posted by OlGrandad
Member since Oct 2009
4003 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 1:00 pm to
ESPN brass realized that much money could be raised by having many more games. Variations of "pay play, get a trophy "

12 teams could brag instead of 4.
Posted by 8clap
Member since Sep 2022
89 posts
Posted on 11/7/24 at 2:39 pm to
If you can't break into the top 12, you don't deserve to be in, regardless of the metric. Personally, I'm looking forward to the playoffs this year.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter