Started By
Message
re: Why did we get rid of the BCS again?
Posted on 11/6/24 at 1:57 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 11/6/24 at 1:57 pm to RollTide1987
They got rid of the BCS because they got a championship game with two SEC teams.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:05 pm to RollTide1987
LOVED the BCS. It took a lot of the politics out of it and ranked you based on how many you won and who you beat.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:10 pm to RollTide1987
If this was the final poll, BYU is a 4 seed and Boise gets in at 12. That's kind of nuts.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:13 pm to CNB
quote:
Find out what
If Carolina is still worthy of being ranked in the top 25.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:45 pm to RollTide1987
There was nothing wrong with the BCS as a ranking system. The problem was fitting 3-4 great teams into ONE championship game.
That system would be a great way to select and seed the playoffs.
That system would be a great way to select and seed the playoffs.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:34 pm to Landmass
quote:
Because it was fricking retarded.
It’s not like it’s mattered for Ol miss. They didn’t do shite during the BCS years, or since.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 11:39 pm to RollTide1987
The only two times that the BCS pissed me off, was 03 when they put Oklahoma in the championship, right after they got beat down in their conference championship. The second was 04 Auburn not getting any love. Add the BCS format to a FOUR TEAM playoff and that fixes both those issues for me.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:41 am to RollTide1987
I never have liked the fact that four teams get a bye.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:48 am to RollTide1987
Why did I know that BCS would have LSU ranked higher.
BCS loved the frick out of LSU. Can’t remember them EVER ranking us lower than we thought we deserved… and when a case could be made for other scenarios, we always got the benefit of any doubt.

BCS loved the frick out of LSU. Can’t remember them EVER ranking us lower than we thought we deserved… and when a case could be made for other scenarios, we always got the benefit of any doubt.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:55 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Why did we get rid of the BCS again?
I think the BCS had some flaws, especially the early portions of it that included things like MOV, but it mostly worked itself out later. If we kept the final iteration of the BCS and had 4 teams instead of 2 I woulnd't have hated that necessarily.
I do kinda hate that formulas and computers are the ultimate decider though. Sure people are going to claim that that eliminates human bias, but a computer can't think. People unfairly (prior to 11 months ago) criticize the committee but they got it exactly right 100% of the time for 9 years. Last year they completley bothced the shite out of it but prior to that they did their job just as good or better than a computer would
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:08 am to RollTide1987
Because you had to be obvious when you manipulated it.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:30 am to RollingwiththeTide62
More humans = more bias
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:38 am to Landmass
quote:
Because it was fricking retarded.
It worked most years but occasionally would frick up picking the difference between 2/3 in some years
See: 2001 Nebraska
See: 2003 Oklahoma
People would have far fewer grievances now that the field has been expanded plus it would remove the absolute trashfire of a process we had last year where we left an undefeated P5 conference champion out of the CFP (even though yes FSU sucked w/o Jordan Travis and continue to do so)
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:47 am to southernboisb
margin of victory
I understand the idea behind it but obviously it's easy to exploit. A top 10 team beating another top 10 team by 14 looks outstanding so you'd want to reward them for that. The problem is that you'd have a highly ranked team playing some unranked sub-.500 scrub then run up the score by 50 just to improve their MOV score.
I understand the idea behind it but obviously it's easy to exploit. A top 10 team beating another top 10 team by 14 looks outstanding so you'd want to reward them for that. The problem is that you'd have a highly ranked team playing some unranked sub-.500 scrub then run up the score by 50 just to improve their MOV score.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 10:06 am to WG_Dawg
Wouldn’t the formula contain current seeding or record in its calculations to differentiate who’s playing whom?
1 would believe that would be included.
1 would believe that would be included.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:29 pm to RollTide1987
I'd rather the computers than humans with hidden agendas
Posted on 11/7/24 at 1:00 pm to Nado Jenkins83
ESPN brass realized that much money could be raised by having many more games. Variations of "pay play, get a trophy "
12 teams could brag instead of 4.
12 teams could brag instead of 4.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 2:39 pm to RollTide1987
If you can't break into the top 12, you don't deserve to be in, regardless of the metric. Personally, I'm looking forward to the playoffs this year.
Popular
Back to top
