Started By
Message

re: Why did the pac 10 give up?

Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:07 pm to
Posted by geauxnavybeatbama
Member since Jul 2013
25134 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:07 pm to
Why doesn't the Pac jsut do the big noon kickoff instead of after dark if that's the issue?


it's because no one actually gives a shite about cal vs washington st.
Posted by SneezyBeltranIsHere
Member since Jul 2021
3668 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

When the SWC died, Texas and TAMU were flirting with the SEC


When the SWC died, the leadership at Texas were very interested in going to the Pac. Texas put out feelers and was rebuffed. Cal and Stanford felt there were already too many state schools that were beneath them in the Pac. They felt that Texas wasn't academically strong enough to join.

If they had taken Texas back in the day, the Pac would still be alive. Hubris killed the Pac.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13907 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:14 pm to
Because the media networks paying the conferences already have stuff in the 3PM Eastern timeslot and they'd cannibalize themselves, or fans don't want to show up at a game at noon any more than any other fanbase?
Posted by BobMayonnaise
Memphis
Member since Feb 2009
1432 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 4:12 pm to
Bad leadership
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
14087 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 4:31 pm to
No one gives a crap about Arkansas-UK or Carolina-Vandy or State-Tennessee.

Some PAC12 AD's, on bad advice, believed their media rights were worth $15-20 million more (for each school) than they actually were worth.
Posted by Zander Kelley
Member since Jan 2024
346 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 5:49 pm to
Total arse hats... and they had a great season as a league this year.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19399 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

It's honestly down to lack of give a frick by most if not all the PAC fanbases.



Makes sense


The NFL had to bribe LA to build a stadium and bring in a team


LA didn’t give a frick if they had a team or not
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
19867 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 6:40 pm to
West coast college sports are not viewed the same as south eastern and mid western. Add in California and the northwest is batshit crazy as a region and their reluctance to embrace some of the southwest schools that could have kept them afloat and their situation became untenable.

Posted by Sid E Walker
InsecureU ©
Member since Nov 2013
24439 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Serious question

With teams like:

Washington
Oregon
usc
UCLA
Utah
Up and coming Colorado

Why were they no longer viable as a conference?

They had a team with a Heisman winner that couldn’t win shite.

Hence, the collapse.
Posted by Mizzouligan
St. Louis, MO
Member since Aug 2014
1596 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

When the SWC died, the leadership at Texas were very interested in going to the Pac. Texas put out feelers and was rebuffed. Cal and Stanford felt there were already too many state schools that were beneath them in the Pac. They felt that Texas wasn't academically strong enough to join.

If they had taken Texas back in the day, the Pac would still be alive. Hubris killed the Pac.


Hubris and amazingly bad leadership.
Posted by JayAg
Member since Jun 2021
14323 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:13 pm to
That’s funny bc I read when the Pac 12 rejected Baylor and it was bc they were conservative and a religious institution. Then their conference went to shite. They deserved it.
Posted by MillerLiteTime
Atlanta
Member since Aug 2018
3248 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Larry Scott and George Kliavkoff completely fricked up their media rights deals.


This is the easy answer but I disagree. Regional interest in west coast college sports declined dramatically in the last 20 years. The Pac commissioner didn’t have a marketable product to sell, leaving him with only 2 options:

1. Try to keep USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington happy by fighting like hell for a a tv contract competitive with the SEC/Big Ten, but risk alienating the networks and/or being last in line and with no money left, or

2. Admit the valuation gap and accept a payout in line with the seemingly inferior Big 12, but risk losing the name brand schools to the Big Ten resulting in zero remaining value and a conference collapse.

The bottom line is the Pac couldn’t survive without the Big 4 schools, and it couldn’t keep them without a nationally competitive tv deal. With the hand he was dealt, I actually think fighting for the big tv deal and hoping a network got desperate was the only move with a chance to save the conference.
Posted by MillerLiteTime
Atlanta
Member since Aug 2018
3248 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

I can't see a UCLA/Minn game drawing any more than a UCLA/Wash St game. When the SEC added Tex and OK they got teams that have very good TV ratings. Playing SEC teams will get them even higher TV ratings, I believe.


Most of the Pac 12 apathy was because their name brand teams didn’t have other name brands to play. West coast fans don’t have the loyalty the SEC schools have but they will care when Ohio St, Michigan, Penn St, etc play USC and Oregon. Even a small slice of the massive west coast market tuning in to Big Ten games is a win for the Big Ten. Not to mention the recruiting pipeline. And they only had to add 4 schools instead of 12 to own it.
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
12173 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

This is the easy answer but I disagree


Well said. Sometimes people are made scapegoats for outcomes outside of their control.
Posted by Rodo
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
920 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 8:49 pm to
There's a funny story that emerged from the debacle where a Utah prof and the president on their own decided that the Pac was worth $50 mil/school. This was counter to the league consultant and the offer from ESPN (~$30 mil). Nonetheless, Kliakoff was directed to counter with the number. ESPN laughed, walked away, and that marked the end of the PAC although it didn't become official until months later.

Rodo
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 8:50 pm
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58718 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 4:22 am to
quote:

They had an "alliance" with the B1G.


Yeah trusting the B1G never seems to work out unless you are MeatChicken or BuckNuts.

On a side note, all those decades of serious cheating and karma finally caught up an bit them in the backside.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16460 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 5:45 am to
GREED. NIL GREED is out of control and the University's GREED to keep bidding is putting extreme pressure on these schools to get into the superconferences and their huge TV contracts.

I hope this lesson on GREED is helpful with future changes that are coming and why they are doing it. The motive will always be the same. GREED.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter