Started By
Message

re: Who Wants To Go On Record?

Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:12 am to
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
28610 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:12 am to
Shouldn’t be hard to get away for the day. Unless you get paid by the hour and need rent
Posted by Trumansfangs
Mo
Member since Sep 2018
9311 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:23 am to



Yes, yes...what a funny episode.







(Sorry, sorry...go back to your argument....sorry)
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92531 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Shouldn’t be hard to get away for the day.


i have a business to run. plus other irons in the fire. and i do not live in BR.
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5587 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:47 am to
The United States Supreme Court has already said conferences can make any rules they want. These TRO's are flying in the face of that ruling. If LSU plays any of these ex-NFL players, they're gonna get arse raped when it's all said and done.
Posted by SOBMarcus
Boerne TX
Member since Apr 2020
2790 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:48 am to
This sounds like a “chips are down“ post
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
28610 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:52 am to
You run a business with an LSU degree? Congrats on beating the odds
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92531 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:54 am to
SCOTUS said they can get paid. NCAA granted a 5th year.

oh look another rebtard who does not know the law.

there is federal precedent behind all of this. go see the colorado ruling.

skankey will be in CONTEMPT of the TRO dipshit. and he is about to get an injunction shoved up his arse by a black judge and black lawyer. melt bitch !
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
78380 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:04 am to
I believe an injunction will come Thursday which will result in only one LSU player being able to play against Clemson. However, the others will join the team before LA Tech. The SEC will then try to take this to the LA supreme court which will take nearly the entire season. They could also sue a handful of members which would be a complete shitshow and is very unlikely.

Ultimately, the SEC is just posturing. The players will play, and everything will be fine. This board will try to sustain the moral outrage but will be unable to do so when their schools are doing the same thing.
Posted by RaginAstros
Member since Apr 2017
1642 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:08 am to
Capt. Kangaroo is deranged and has a similar sickness to the Trump Derangement Syndrome......LSUDS!!!!!
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5587 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:09 am to
quote:


SCOTUS said they can get paid. NCAA granted a 5th year.


NCAA v. Alston - individual athletic conferences are free to impose their own rules, including stricter regulations than what the NCAA requires.

Again, this will not end well at all for LSU and they're digging their own grave.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74067 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Again, this will not end well at all for LSU and they're digging their own grave.


Do you actually think they're just going to play the players if the injunction is lifted?

Serious question.
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5587 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Do you actually think they're just going to play the players if the injunction is lifted?


If they play these players at all - even under the TRO - the SEC will take action in the end.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74067 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:25 am to
quote:

If they play these players at all - even under the TRO - the SEC will take action in the end.


Are you willing to risk the same thing with Chambliss?
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92531 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:28 am to
we will have all our additions by the time we roll into OLD PISS and beat their asses.

can't wait.
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5587 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Are you willing to risk the same thing with Chambliss?


The SEC hasn't said anything about players getting a medical redshirt. They have absolutely said "NO" to ex-NFL players.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74067 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

The SEC hasn't said anything about players getting a medical redshirt.


Chambliss didn't get a medical redshirt, he got a TRO to circumvent the NCAA.

According to SEC bylaw article 14.01.01, players must be in compliance with all NCAA rules to practice, receive aid, and compete.

As far as the NCAA is concerned, Chambliss is ineligible. His request for a medical redshirt was denied twice.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92531 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:56 am to
quote:

As far as the NCAA is concerned, Chambliss is ineligible. His request for a medical redshirt was denied twice.


right. but at that time he was allowed to request it from the NCAA. it had nothing to do with the 5 for 5 rule many are trying to make it out to be about.

Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
5587 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:57 am to
Medical hardship waiver != signing an NFL contract, participating in NFL practices, getting cut, returning to college.

You do realize how much of an idiot you sound like by trying to say these two things are the same, right?
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 10:11 am
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74067 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

right. but at that time he was allowed to request it from the NCAA. it had nothing to do with the 5 for 5 rule many are trying to make it out to be about.


Correct, the players are ineligible for two different reasons, but they're all ineligible at the end of the day.

The question is will the SEC enforce its rules equally?

Which is the orgin of this quote:
quote:

"I think you're going to get in an interesting situation where, as a conference, you're saying 'We're going to follow this court order but these kids that got that other court order, we're going to say, 'No you can't,’” Kiffin said.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74067 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Medical hardship waiver != singing an NFL contract, participating in NFL practices, getting cut, returning to college.

You do realize how much of an idiot you sound like by trying to say these two things are the same, right?


Again, no one got a medical hardship waiver.

All players are ineligible and all are in violation of SEC rules, outside of any injunctions.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter