Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:55 am to DawginSC
quote:
9 - Tennessee - 857
11 - UGA - 854
This is actually pretty amazing... the list goes as follows. Which actually ties out to what most are saying. Tenn-Auburn are blue blood if you want to expand the list to about 15 teams but under most definitions only AL is one.
10 Tenn
11 Georgia
12 LSU
13 Auburn
quote:
An auburn fan dickriding Bama
Looking at statistics and facts=dickriding to UGA... may need to get a Gtech grad in here for some objectivity
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 9:57 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:41 am to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Texas was literally the winningest team in college football from 2000-2009 Go back to bed, gramps
Florida was the winningest team from 1990-2013
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 10:46 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:46 am to VolNavy98
quote:
Fixed it for ya
Tennessee doesn’t have 6 natties. Lmao
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:47 am to Poker Dough
quote:
UGA wins another NC they will have as many as you do chromosomes
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:49 am to ALhunter
quote:
Who are the SEC blue bloods?
There's one true Blue Blood in the SEC. Alabama.
The other Blue Bloods are:
USC
Ohio State
Michigan
Notre Dame
Oklahoma
Any claims beyond that are bogus.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:50 am to Between TheHedges
quote:
An auburn fan dickriding Bama
Telling the truth isn't dickriding, you twat.
What's sad is UGA fans believing they are a blue blood. You guys are fricking delusional.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:51 am to ALhunter
quote:
This is actually pretty amazing... the list goes as follows. Which actually ties out to what most are saying. Tenn-Auburn are blue blood if you want to expand the list to about 15 teams but under most definitions only AL is one.
10 Tenn
11 Georgia
12 LSU
13 Auburn
I think the thing that's most amazing about the SEC is the depth in the conference. No conference has as many bluebloods or even teams on the periphery of that status, and it's not even close.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:56 am to Milf n Cookies
quote:
There's one true Blue Blood in the SEC. Alabama.
The other Blue Bloods are:
USC
Ohio State
Michigan
Notre Dame
Oklahoma
Any claims beyond that are bogus.
I don't know how you include OU but exclude Nebraska. Nebraska has four absolutely undisputed national championships in the past 60 seasons. There are only two other schools that can say that. From 1962 - 2003 (41 seasons), Nebraska won 9+ games in every season but two. Nebraska is only one of eight programs with 900+ wins too.
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 10:57 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:03 am to Tornado Alley
It really doesn’t matter, in my opinion.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:04 am to Cheese Grits
Swc- Grambling.. do your research
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:07 am to Born2rock
quote:
It really doesn’t matter, in my opinion.
Sure, it really doesn't matter, but it's fun to debate.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:10 am to ALhunter
How can #8and4aTm ever be in any tier of Blue Bloods? They weren’t even consistent contenders in the SWC or Big12. One great recruiting class & boom, they’re blue bloods now. For joes sake, there’s realistically only three in the SEC; Bama, LSU & Florida & Florida is slipping fast.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:13 am to ALhunter
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:18 am to ALhunter
quote:
CFB Blue Blood Chart
I've seen this before. I don't want to say it's outright bullshite, but it is pretty flawed.
For example USC was preseason #1 in 2012. That counts as a week in the top 5. In fact they were in the top 5 for the first 3 weeks of the season until they lost to Stanford. However they FINISHED 7-6, and unranked. Yet they were top 5 for 3 weeks and included in the top 25 every week until November even with 3 losses.
I think a more accurate chart would only count the final AP poll of each year after the season is concluded and not early rankings which are heavily skewed towards certain teams. It becomes self-fulfilling prophecy at that point. Now the chart may look similar for all I know if anyone wants to do the leg work but I have trouble legitimizing such a chart with those parameters
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 11:23 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:27 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
UT (.671 winning %, 861 wins, 2 NCs)
LSU (.653 winning %, 814 wins, 4 NCs)
UGA (.661 winning %, 859 wins, 2 NCs)
We'll have passed Tennessee before the end of the season in win %.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:29 am to VoxDawg
quote:
We'll have passed Tennessee before the end of the season in win %.
All time wins, perhaps, percentage..not a chance.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:35 am to ALhunter
quote:
3
Florida
Auburn
Penn State
Fl State
UCLA - Living off old glory. Maybe they bring it back in the B10
UGA
TENN
LSU
Miami
Tier 4
Washington
T A&M
Clemson - Rising fast
Arkansas
Haaahahaaaaaaaahaaaa
I'll have what you're drinking
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:43 am to VoxDawg
quote:
UT (.671 winning %, 861 wins, 2 NCs)
LSU (.653 winning %, 814 wins, 4 NCs)
UGA (.661 winning %, 859 wins, 2 NCs)
We'll have passed Tennessee before the end of the season in win %.
that's not how numbers work.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 12:02 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
Also, Oklahoma has a losing record 50-63-5 to Texas.
So does every other "blue blood" except Notre Dame and USC
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News