Started By
Message

What’s the record for teams from a single conference in CWS?
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:09 pm
Not an easy record to find.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:13 pm to Ag Zwin
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:14 pm to Farmer1906
4 is all but a guarantee here today. Damnit LSU
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:18 pm to Hailstate15
quote:
4 is all but a guarantee here today. Damnit LSU
To think FSU was one of the last to be invited....they on fire now
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:20 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
To think FSU was one of the last to be invited....they on fire now
Same for Michigan as last four in.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:20 pm to WorkinDawg
“Trail of Tears” now for FSU. I have seen 11 take much, much better teams to Omaha and come home empty.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 2:47 pm to Ag Zwin
Should’ve been more ... both arky and OM should’ve been in Supers against non SEC teams... instead one is guaranteed to be eliminated .
So glad we get to grow the sport and let Michigan go to Omaha though :rollseyes
So glad we get to grow the sport and let Michigan go to Omaha though :rollseyes
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:04 pm to Lawyered
quote:
So glad we get to grow the sport and let Michigan go to Omaha though :rollseyes
Blame UCLA and Oregon State.
The defending national champions couldn't even get out of their own regional and the #1 overall seed couldn't win a super against one of the last teams in.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:11 pm to Lawyered
I watched a good bit of the Michigan-UCLA series. Michigan earned it by playing well.
They did not back in or luck into it.
I remember them playing at Dudy Noble in 1985. They had a great team i. e. Barry Larkin & Co. They took us to a winner take all finale in the Regional that year.
So no reason to disparage them this year. They are a good ball club.
They did not back in or luck into it.
I remember them playing at Dudy Noble in 1985. They had a great team i. e. Barry Larkin & Co. They took us to a winner take all finale in the Regional that year.
So no reason to disparage them this year. They are a good ball club.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:14 pm to Lawyered
quote:
So glad we get to grow the sport and let Michigan go to Omaha though :rollseyes
Why are you acting like beating UCLA would have been a foregone conclusion?
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:17 pm to Dawgsontop34
maybe I should've picked a different team I guess but my point is these blatant SEC supers matchups solely to eliminate conference teams for the sake of adding different teams is BS...
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:25 pm to Lawyered
quote:
maybe I should've picked a different team I guess but my point is these blatant SEC supers matchups solely to eliminate conference teams for the sake of adding different teams is BS...
It's all proximity, imo. Should Ole Miss fly to LA to play UCLA?
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:27 pm to Lawyered
quote:
maybe I should've picked a different team I guess but my point is these blatant SEC supers matchups solely to eliminate conference teams for the sake of adding different teams is BS...
If anything, they set it up to have the Super Regionals look like this:
SEC: 6 (6 advanced, 4 to CWS)
ACC: 3 (4 advanced, 2 to CWS)
PAC 12: 3 (2 advanced, 0 to CWS)
Big 12: 3 (2 advanced, 1 to CWS)
American: 1 (1 advanced, 0 to CWS)
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:31 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
It's all proximity, imo. Should Ole Miss fly to LA to play UCLA?
Stanford came to Starkville... its 2019.. these teams have planes and can travel easily.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:33 pm to 4Ghost
quote:
“Trail of Tears” now for FSU. I have seen 11 take much, much better teams to Omaha and come home empty.
2017 was not the best team Sully took to Omaha. It was just the best team once they got there.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:35 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
It's all proximity, imo. Should Ole Miss fly to LA to play UCLA?
If they treated it as a big time sport then yea, they should. I get regionals trying to be located close to schools, but super regionals should be #1-16 regardless of area.
Inter-conference and inter-regional matchups should not be a problem at all at that point.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:39 pm to SummerOfGeorge
But don’t regionals feed super regionals? Honest question
Posted on 6/10/19 at 3:58 pm to Lawyered
I get what your saying about matching up teams in a Regional to potentially play a team from a different conference in a SR.
In the SEC’s case, it is impossible because we had ten teams invited, so it is possible that two of our teams will match up in a SR unless they reseed the teams after the Regional round which they are not going to do.
Heck they had Oregon State and UCLA paired together. Not really fair to them except that Michigan messed it up by winning the Regional and then the SR.
Like the problem of the Bridges of Konigsbergs after you have more than 8 teams invited the possibility exists that two of your conference teams will meet in a SR. Unfortunately this year it was Ole Miss and Arky. Two years ago it was State-LSU and last year it was State - Vandy. This year you could have had UGA-LSU except Florida State messed that up by winning.
In the SEC’s case, it is impossible because we had ten teams invited, so it is possible that two of our teams will match up in a SR unless they reseed the teams after the Regional round which they are not going to do.
Heck they had Oregon State and UCLA paired together. Not really fair to them except that Michigan messed it up by winning the Regional and then the SR.
Like the problem of the Bridges of Konigsbergs after you have more than 8 teams invited the possibility exists that two of your conference teams will meet in a SR. Unfortunately this year it was Ole Miss and Arky. Two years ago it was State-LSU and last year it was State - Vandy. This year you could have had UGA-LSU except Florida State messed that up by winning.
Posted on 6/10/19 at 4:02 pm to BloodSweat&Beers
Thanks for the reminder, gotta keep hope alive.!
Posted on 6/10/19 at 4:09 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:some of us tabbed UCLA as overrated a couple of weeks ago.
Why are you acting like beating UCLA would have been a foregone conclusion?
Popular
Back to top
