Started By
Message
The SEC Is Getting a New Schedule Model, but Which One Will Win Out?
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:37 am
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:37 am
LINK
So what are their talking points? Let’s get to the issues:
Eight vs. nine
Permanent opponents and year-ending rivalries
So what are their talking points? Let’s get to the issues:
Eight vs. nine
quote:
In the conference’s current format, teams play eight conference games: six each year from within their own division and two opponents from the opposite division, one on a permanent basis and one rotating—a 6-1-1 model that has long been the target of criticism both in and outside the league.
Why? Because it’s not equitable and doesn’t allow for more games against more teams within the conference. For instance, last year’s Alabama-Florida game in the Swamp was the first regular-season matchup between the two in 10 years.
If there’s one concept everyone in the league has agreed on, it’s that they should play one another more often. Either of these formats, 1–7 or 3–6, allows for such. The rotation would mean that each team will host and travel to every league opponent in a four-year stretch.
Aside from supplying an extra nonconference victory for those that need it, what good is the eight-game model over the nine-game format? For one, proponents say, it is an even number, and even numbers are easier to schedule. For example, under a nine-game model, an SEC team will play just four home games every other year.
Permanent opponents and year-ending rivalries
quote:
Already, there is compromise from one group to the other in regard to the three permanent opponents. In several versions of the permanent opponents floating around the league, it appears that the top eight teams would play two of their three permanent games against fellow top eight teams. They’d get two tops and one bottom. The bottom eight would get two bottoms and one from the top half.
Is this purposely done? Maybe. Might it be a compromise to get the bottom half on board with a nine-game schedule? It sure feels that way. And honestly, it makes a ton of sense, and it’s something the league used in creating the 10-game league schedule during the COVID-19 season.
Still, choosing a team’s permanent opponents will be a most tricky and unenviable endeavor that is sure to tick off virtually every fan base in the conference. Athletic directors and coaches have given their feedback on permanent opponents, but ultimately, conference officials will make the decisions. Good luck to SEC administrators Mark Womack, who is in charge of scheduling, and Charlie Hussey, who himself has been involved in this issue recently.
quote:
So let’s give this a shot, shall we? We guessed on permanent opponents while (1) considering the primary and secondary rivalries; (2) using geography; and (3) creating as much equity as possible (remember, top half teams get two from their own and one from the bottom half; bottom half teams get two from their own and one from the top half):
quote:
Missouri: Oklahoma; Arkansas; South Carolina
Arkansas: Missouri; Texas; Kentucky
Texas A&M: LSU; Texas; Mississippi State
Texas: Oklahoma; Texas A&M; Arkansas
Oklahoma: Texas; Missouri; Florida
LSU: Ole Miss; Texas A&M; Alabama
Ole Miss: Mississippi State; LSU; Vanderbilt
Mississippi State: Ole Miss; Kentucky; Texas A&M
Alabama: Auburn; Tennessee; LSU
Auburn: Alabama; Georgia; Vanderbilt
Vanderbilt: Tennessee; Ole Miss; Auburn
Tennessee: Vanderbilt; Alabama; South Carolina
Kentucky: Mississippi State; Arkansas; Georgia
Georgia: Auburn; Florida; Kentucky
Florida: Georgia; South Carolina; Oklahoma
South Carolina: Florida; Missouri; Tennessee
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:47 am to Captain Crown
The 3 permanent opponent setup is so much better than what we currently have. You get to keep the biggest rivals and will play other teams what, every other year? So you don't completely lose non-perm rivals either.
There are negatives to everything, but the difference between the current setup and that are overwhelmingly positive.
There are negatives to everything, but the difference between the current setup and that are overwhelmingly positive.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:53 am to Captain Crown
I want the 9 game schedule with 3 OOC opponents.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:00 am to Captain Crown
quote:
For example, under a nine-game model, an SEC team will play just four home games every other year.
you mean like we do now?
What a STUPID “point”.
Yes, if you add one more conf game, you will have one MORE conference home game one year, and one more conference road game the next.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:00 am to Captain Crown
I appreciate what they are trying to do but I highly doubt some of these permanent opponents will be accepted.
I’d definitely like this schedule as an LSU fan. I’d miss the UF game but Bama, aTm, and Ole Miss is damn fine for permanent opponents.
Honestly the only opponents to this would be Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina right? They have big rivalries with non-SEC schools and that makes them almost forced to play 10 P5 schools
I’d definitely like this schedule as an LSU fan. I’d miss the UF game but Bama, aTm, and Ole Miss is damn fine for permanent opponents.
Honestly the only opponents to this would be Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina right? They have big rivalries with non-SEC schools and that makes them almost forced to play 10 P5 schools
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 10:02 am
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:03 am to Captain Crown
Arkansas: Missouri; Texas; Kentucky?
Kentucky?
Wtf?
So the closest SEC team to Arkansas (OU) wouldn’t be placed as a permanent rival but Kentucky does. Nahhh. Looks like BS to me.
Kentucky?
Wtf?
So the closest SEC team to Arkansas (OU) wouldn’t be placed as a permanent rival but Kentucky does. Nahhh. Looks like BS to me.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:07 am to Bwmdx
It’s because Arkansas isn’t considered a top 8 team and Oklahoma is. As an Arkansas fan, I say frick the charity, id love to play Texas and Oklahoma every year. Just give us a Mississippi school instead of Missouri, please
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:08 am to Bwmdx
I thinks it’s to give Arkansas an easier schedule. N it going to lie, it’s a little insulting.
In my opinion, if the do 3 permanent opponents, center it around historical and geographical rivals. Screw “fairness”. Arkansas has no history with Kentucky and vice versa.
In my opinion, if the do 3 permanent opponents, center it around historical and geographical rivals. Screw “fairness”. Arkansas has no history with Kentucky and vice versa.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:10 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:it's laughable - some of the pairings in the name of - wait for it - "equity"
I appreciate what they are trying to do but I highly doubt some of these permanent opponents will be accepted.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:16 am to Captain Crown
3-6 makes more sense and answers most legitimate Qs.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:17 am to Captain Crown
Tennessee has Vandy and South Carolina. Does that make them a bottom 8 team?
It’s a fricking paradox. Big 6 and Bottom 8.
It’s a fricking paradox. Big 6 and Bottom 8.
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:18 am to Hugh McElroy
Yes. I’m guessing they woukd be using this order
8 Auburn/ aTm
9 Tennessee
10 Arkansas
8 Auburn/ aTm
9 Tennessee
10 Arkansas
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:22 am to lefty08
If that’s what you think, the proper way to write it is:
7. Auburn/A&M
9. UT
10. Arkansas
7. Auburn/A&M
9. UT
10. Arkansas
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:24 am to Captain Crown
If we are going with this set up. This is the best match ups I have scene. Looks good to me.
I think Sankey will push forward with this as soon as the extended playoff happens. But until then, they probably would stay with an 8 game schedule so a better chance of getting 2 teams in a 4 team playoff.
I think Sankey will push forward with this as soon as the extended playoff happens. But until then, they probably would stay with an 8 game schedule so a better chance of getting 2 teams in a 4 team playoff.
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 10:32 am
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:25 am to Hugh McElroy
Sorry to confuse you.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:28 am to Captain Crown
3 permanent rivals with 5 rotating games is the best.
But I'd take 3 and 6 also, but I also like the 8 games of 1 and 7 since I don't really care about rival games that much.
But I'd take 3 and 6 also, but I also like the 8 games of 1 and 7 since I don't really care about rival games that much.
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:28 am to Captain Crown
I like staring off with 1-7 format for the first 4 years Texas and OU join than go to 9 games in year 5
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:31 am to Oilfieldbiology
If they want to do a top 8 bottom 8, the schedule should be changed every 5 years or so
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News