Started By
Message
re: The real deal about this game
Posted on 12/23/11 at 12:52 am to ketchupmoney
Posted on 12/23/11 at 12:52 am to ketchupmoney
9-6
0
Posted on 12/23/11 at 1:04 am to RMFTide
quote:
We both know what actually happened & nothing that any of us says changes that, so take a Valium Brah.
What we all know is the fact that it was one slugfest of a football game. I am glad it is happening again, no doubt we have the best two teams playing for the championship. See y'all in New Orleans. A matchup of divisional rivals for the championship will probably never happen again. All the what if's, will be settled on the field.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 1:06 am to tigerbyteu
quote:
All the what if's, will be settled on the field.
Truth
Posted on 12/23/11 at 2:41 am to ketchupmoney
LSU could have won by 2 tds. What's your point?
Posted on 12/23/11 at 3:09 am to tigerbyteu
quote:
All the what if's, will be settled on the field.
You forgot Again.
All the what ifs will be settled on the field AGAIN.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 3:22 am to ketchupmoney
You guys remind me a lot of the UGa Dawgs in '03.
Yes the Dawgs AA PK missed 2 or 3 FG in 03 and UGa had more scoring opps. Every Dawg fan and most pundits thought UGa was better. After all, the had more star power with David Pollack, David Greene, et al.
What all the asshats couldn't wrap their biased minds around was that UGa lost those scoring chances because of LSU's defense.
Oh yeah, Dawg fans and SEC media were sure the Dawgs would win in Atlanta. The result, a beat down of the puppies.
LSU has improved since Nov 5 and have been tested since then. Bama had a cakewalk since their LOSS!
Yes the Dawgs AA PK missed 2 or 3 FG in 03 and UGa had more scoring opps. Every Dawg fan and most pundits thought UGa was better. After all, the had more star power with David Pollack, David Greene, et al.
What all the asshats couldn't wrap their biased minds around was that UGa lost those scoring chances because of LSU's defense.
Oh yeah, Dawg fans and SEC media were sure the Dawgs would win in Atlanta. The result, a beat down of the puppies.
LSU has improved since Nov 5 and have been tested since then. Bama had a cakewalk since their LOSS!
Posted on 12/23/11 at 3:56 am to ketchupmoney
quote:
Alabama doesn't need luck to win this gamme - LSU does. All Alabama needs is a little consistancy on special teams.
I don't read the SECR that much, thus my question is sincere and heartfelt ...
Are all you gumps this fricking dumb?
Posted on 12/23/11 at 4:02 am to Statestreet
Scoreboard
Posted on 12/23/11 at 4:19 am to ketchupmoney
9-6 bammer jammer
Posted on 12/23/11 at 5:27 am to ketchupmoney
quote:
Alabama could have easily won the LSU game by 10. Bama created more opportunities to win it than LSU and some very unusual things had to happen for [Alabama] to lose it.
Okay, fine, let's just assume this shite is true.
If Alabama in all their complete superiority could not execute at home with 2 weeks to prepare in the 2nd biggest game of the year, then why in the mother frick will they be able to execute on the road in the 1st biggest game of the year?
This post was edited on 12/23/11 at 5:29 am
Posted on 12/23/11 at 5:31 am to JohnnyU
quote:
LSU has improved since Nov 5 and have been tested since then. Bama had a cakewalk since their LOSS!
JohnnyU
Nail on the head there Brother
Posted on 12/23/11 at 5:51 am to ketchupmoney
One of the most effective ways to convince people what you're saying is true is to acknowledge the points in favor of what you're arguing against and debunk them. When you can't do this, trivial things like facts get in the way.
quote:So could LSU.
Alabama could have easily won the LSU game by 10.
quote:More? LSU effectively kept Bama out of the red zone, blocked a FG, made a key INT and effectively flipped field position all game long with a freshman punter. List yours.
Bama created more opportunities to win it than LSU and some very unusual things had to happen for [Alabama] to lose it.
quote:Maybe in Alabama.
Those facts are widely acknowledged and the reason the voters set the rematch.
quote:. . . for one quarter on offense and two on defense - but you know that.
In the SECCG Georgia completely dominated LSU . . .
quote:This is how LSU has won all season long - save the Bama game.
The Tigers found a running game in the second half to pressure and fatigue UGAs D but it was their special teams play that devastated the dogs.
quote:It's called coaching, and it starts at the top.
Alabama couldn't have played much worse on special teams.
quote:K.
A little consistancy on special teams is all Bama needs to prevail and take home it's 14th NC.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:30 am to ketchupmoney
ketchupmoney; You make some good points but LSU made plays when we had to and the Tide did miss out on some. I'm sure some of the same will happen for both teams in the NC.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:34 am to JohnnyU
quote:
LSU has improved since Nov 5 and have been tested since then. Bama had a cakewalk since their LOSS!
You call 30yrds passing by JJ improvement? He's regressed to 09' levels. And what's this cakewalk business? Did you have a hard schedule since? What did I miss? Oh, Hogs, I forgot. We beat them by 24. UGA, I don't know but I suppose AJ would have had more than 30 yrds passing.
LSU has more RB's now. Ok but only one of them will run the ball each play and none of them are a TR.
HB7's been running back punts. Ok but Bama kicks straight up 38 yards. No chance for return.
Excuse me if I'm not too worried about LSU's improvement.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:45 am to GarmischTiger
quote:
One of the most effective ways to convince people what you're saying is true is to acknowledge the points in favor of what you're arguing against and debunk them. When you can't do this, trivial things like facts get in the way.
quote:
Alabama could have easily won the LSU game by 10.
So could LSU.
The only missed LSU play was the JJ overthrow at the end of the 1st half. That would have given you 4 more pts. So, how do you win by 10?
1) We had the pass at the goal line (int by Reid). That's 7.
2) The block in the back on the Baron int that would have us at the 3yrd line. 7vs3 +4
3) 4 missed FG's. 3 missed in regulation 3-9pts.
We had several more missed opportunities but these were the ones that are instant point makers.
Talk about a delusional fan base. What you guys won't admit is how close that game was. It's like you dominated the whole game or something.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:53 am to bama1959
quote:
UGA, I don't know
why don't you know? Its almost like you didn't even make it to your conference title game or something. Is that a good thing?
quote:
only one of them will run the ball each play and none of them are a TR
the TR that did jackshit on 11/5 other than get 25 yards on a couple swing passes were he was left completely uncovered? The TR that quit in the 2010 LSU game? The TR that dropped a pass in his gut in overtime because he didn't want to be hit anymore?
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:57 am to bama1959
quote:
So, how do you win by 10?
we were the team that got inside the red zone multiple times. I think 7 + 7 is more than 10.
quote:
1) We had the pass at the goal line (int by Reid). That's 7.
lol ok?
quote:
2) The block in the back on the Baron int that would have us at the 3yrd line. 7vs3 +4
2 blocks in the back on one return. Sorry, cheating is not allowed (well I know it normally is for you by SEC refs, but not this time)
quote:
3) 4 missed FG's. 3 missed in regulation 3-9pts.
3 missed by a guy who was 1 for 3 on the year and is now 2 for 9. 1 49yarder missed by a little girl with a season long of 37 yards. What did you expect? You made it inside the redzone once, to the fricking 17 and you got points on that drive. Stop pretending like you should have scored any more.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 6:58 am to bama1959
LSU could have easily won by 55
If Shep doesnt fall down,
Mo returns the int for 6,
JLee doesnt throw a horrible pick which gave alabama HALF of their points,
etc, etc, etc....
see how this works?
now shut the frick up. 9-6. deal with it
If Shep doesnt fall down,
Mo returns the int for 6,
JLee doesnt throw a horrible pick which gave alabama HALF of their points,
etc, etc, etc....
see how this works?
now shut the frick up. 9-6. deal with it
Posted on 12/23/11 at 7:03 am to bama1959
So the penalty against Mathieu against Dre didn't hurt us? 30 yard return called back? I see how it works, only Bama penalties hurt Bama.
Trent fumbling the ball, if he had just been 1 foot mire in bounds, that's Tigers' ball.
Russell Shepard falling down untouched. Should have been a touchdown.
Uncalled picks by Bama went uncalled. These made for your longer plays.
If our QB doesnt throw the ball right to your DB, Twice, then the game ends in regulation with the Tigers winning.
That misoppirtunity shiet works both ways.
Tigers won. Bama lost.
Trent fumbling the ball, if he had just been 1 foot mire in bounds, that's Tigers' ball.
Russell Shepard falling down untouched. Should have been a touchdown.
Uncalled picks by Bama went uncalled. These made for your longer plays.
If our QB doesnt throw the ball right to your DB, Twice, then the game ends in regulation with the Tigers winning.
That misoppirtunity shiet works both ways.
Tigers won. Bama lost.
Posted on 12/23/11 at 7:05 am to ketchupmoney
quote:
Those facts are widely acknowledged and the reason the voters set the rematch.
The facts are that your coach spent all day Saturday on ESPN pleading his case for a re-match while LSU and Oklahoma State were playing football for conference championships.
Those are the facts.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Years to you and yours.
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News