Started By
Message

Targeting?

Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6992 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm
Was that targeting?
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6781 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
That was big boy football
Posted by p226
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2016
2133 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
I thought so. Head first hit on defenseless receiver.
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
12250 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
If the ball is in the air is it targeting?
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
24722 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
No
Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
8386 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
NO!!
Posted by Badgerfan
Member since Dec 2025
3 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:35 pm to
No. Hit with face mask
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10907 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

No. Hit with face mask

Devin White no targeting against Ms St confirmed.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3162 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:37 pm to
I don’t know the elements required but I think in the past they generally call something like that targeting
Posted by ScotlandAve
Member since Dec 2024
438 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:38 pm to
There should be no targeting especially in that situation. Players make plays. Toure made the play.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6992 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

If the ball is in the air is it targeting?

Yeah I’ve seen targeting called off the ball even.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6992 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

There should be no targeting especially in that situation.

I don’t like the rule, but I think it should be enforced with some semblance of consistency.

I like how they’ll call it on nitpicky incidental contact or ball carriers lowering their heads — but not a flying hat on a hat on a play where both dudes don’t get up off the grass lol.
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
4785 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:44 pm to
1. It doesn't have to be the crown for targeting
2. If it's regular season that's targeting
Posted by RTRnFlorida
Member since Mar 2024
2526 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:44 pm to
Yes
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
26662 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:45 pm to
I don’t mind targeting call. Make it a 15 yrs penalty and make player sit two series. No need for ejections. That said it didn’t impact game. He threw a pick the next play. Reed just had a really bad game but Miamis defense had something to do with that.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
25714 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:45 pm to
That is targeting. Hope that cheating motherfricker knocked himself out
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6992 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I don’t mind targeting call. Make it a 15 yrs penalty and make player sit two series. No need for ejections. That said it didn’t impact game. He threw a pick the next play. Reed just had a really bad game but Miamis defense had something to do with that.

Agreed across the board. Possibly affects the subsequent playcall though.

Still, you cannot throw that ball.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 2:51 pm
Posted by Crimson
Member since Jan 2013
1813 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

That said it didn’t impact game. He threw a pick the next play.


We don’t know that. Half the distance to the goal and first down. Play call may change. That being said they still gotta score.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6992 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Hope that cheating motherfricker knocked himself out

I don’t think he meant to do it & am glad they’re alright

I do think it should’ve been a penalty still
Posted by RTRnFlorida
Member since Mar 2024
2526 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:08 pm to
1st and goal from the 2 is different than 3rd and goal. The no call absolutely impacted the game.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter