Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/1/26 at 7:39 pm to BCreed1
quote:Yeah because something happening at Southern Utah is going to automatically happen to an SEC program.
If I were you, I would not be.............. LOL
Did you forget that they slapped Michigan on the wrist for way worse shite?
Posted on 2/1/26 at 9:00 pm to BCreed1
quote:
LINK
Article makes multiple incorrect statements.
An LSU athlete is being investigated, not LSU itself. Also, is not related to the football program.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:28 am to BCreed1
A test case in the current climate before going after the bigger fish.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:44 am to rbtgoodson
This action shows how mad the NCAA is at Mississippi.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:50 am to BCreed1
Anchor this abortion of a thread. There are so many incorrect parts of that article and OP added more with his own fantasies.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:04 am to BCreed1
quote:
Had talks of money been involved or FAAs signed, it's moved to an LI.
Is that still a true statement? In the past when athletes could not be paid, this was a given. Now, all the athletes can be paid. That is what the NCAA lost on big time in the court of law, so how can money being discussed move it to level 1? If the NCAA did, maybe Ole Miss has a legal avenue against NCAA?
My prediction is L2 and Pete has to sit in timeout for a game.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:46 pm to DarthRebel
Frist, I think it's all BS. They have allowed this to go on for too long. So somebody is going to be made an example of to curb it taking place when it could have been done from the beginning.
But to answer your question the rules governing tampering have shifted significantly following the House v. NCAA settlement and the creation of the College Sports Commission (CSC).
Under the current framework, an infraction involving a student-athlete who has already signed a Financial Aid Agreement (FAA) and enrolled can be elevated to a Level 1 (Severe Breach of Conduct) violation if specific "aggravating factors" or systemic violations are present.
Under the 2026 College Sports Commission (CSC) and NCAA regulatory framework, this is no longer a "recruiting violation"—it is a severe breach of the House v. NCAA settlement terms.
The core rule that raises this to Level 1 is Bylaw 19.1.1 (Severe Breach of Conduct).
Offering $2 million to a student-athlete who has already signed an FAA and started classes is considered a direct inducement to transfer. Because the amount is substantial and the timing (after enrollment) shows a deliberate attempt to undermine another program's roster, it is classified as a "Severe Breach."
Like I said, they should have been enforcing this from the beginning and we would not be here. But enough people within the industry has complained and gone to the media that they are going to have to act. The question is what will they actually do.
But to answer your question the rules governing tampering have shifted significantly following the House v. NCAA settlement and the creation of the College Sports Commission (CSC).
Under the current framework, an infraction involving a student-athlete who has already signed a Financial Aid Agreement (FAA) and enrolled can be elevated to a Level 1 (Severe Breach of Conduct) violation if specific "aggravating factors" or systemic violations are present.
Under the 2026 College Sports Commission (CSC) and NCAA regulatory framework, this is no longer a "recruiting violation"—it is a severe breach of the House v. NCAA settlement terms.
The core rule that raises this to Level 1 is Bylaw 19.1.1 (Severe Breach of Conduct).
Offering $2 million to a student-athlete who has already signed an FAA and started classes is considered a direct inducement to transfer. Because the amount is substantial and the timing (after enrollment) shows a deliberate attempt to undermine another program's roster, it is classified as a "Severe Breach."
Like I said, they should have been enforcing this from the beginning and we would not be here. But enough people within the industry has complained and gone to the media that they are going to have to act. The question is what will they actually do.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 2:31 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Where did I say LSU was tampering? Show your work. Bet you can't.
I’ll take that bet.
You implied this by stating-
“somebody(ole miss) turned them in.”
Unsubstantiated guess stated by you as being factual.
Moreover, why would Ole Miss report LSU about an athlete who is likely associated with a non-revenue producing sport. This, considering the allegations rumored to have occurred.
You should take the loss and quit doubling down.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 7:22 pm to BCreed1
quote:
But enough people within the industry has complained and gone to the media that they are going to have to act. The question is what will they actually do.
It turns out for LSU, absolutely nothing at all.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 7:54 pm to tigerspin
You can only laugh at all the experts about the end of the football program. Doesn’t even involve a men’s sport or money from lsu
Posted on 2/2/26 at 7:58 pm to tigerspin
Let’s all point and laugh gif
Posted on 2/3/26 at 3:26 am to BCreed1
OP is one of the original gang members known as the dumbass gang.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News