
BCreed1
| Favorite team: | Alabama |
| Location: | Alabama |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 6445 |
| Registered on: | 1/18/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
It seems like you are fundamentally misunderstanding what a “goal” is.
Why do you think there can only be one goal. The admin stated goalS in 2924 and has repeated those goals.
quote:
If your goal is to raise revenue, you have to keep your tariffs in place.
From the Baseline of 10%
quote:
If your goal is to on-shore, you can’t use the tariffs as counter leverage because that’s not why you set them in the first place.
Those are secondary tariffs, not baseline.
quote:
If your goal is to leverage tariffs to reduce counter tariffs, then again, as soon as you “win”, you remove the tariffs and get zero revenue and zero on-shoring.
Does it remove the baseline?
This is right
quote:
It literally can't be.
But it can be. That's what was promoted by the Admin in 2024.
1. Increasing tariff revenue.
By it's very nature, a tariff will raise revenue. That does not take away from #2 and #3.
The admin made clear they will use tariffs for this specific reason.
2- Increasing domestic production
Was also sold to the US that they would be used to do that. There are other policies that help this. Open here in the USA for example. That does not rid the flat 10% that he has done. That removes the extras.
3- Leveraging for a reduction in their tariffs on US goods
This has actually happened. Just some examples:
Philippines — Agreed to eliminate tariffs on American goods (to 0%) in a July 2025 deal; U.S. capped tariffs at 19%.
Indonesia — Dropped tariffs on U.S. goods to 0%; U.S. reduced its rate to 19%.
Thailand — Committed to eliminate tariffs on almost all U.S. goods; U.S. set rate at 19%.
Cambodia — Eliminated all tariffs on U.S. goods (100% coverage).
Malaysia — Reduced or removed tariffs on a wide variety of U.S. goods.
United Kingdom — Eliminated tariffs on U.S. ethanol and increased quota/access for U.S. beef (from low previous levels); part of a May 2025 framework deal.
Vietnam — Allowed many U.S. products duty-free entry.
Other nations, such as India (offered to lower/eliminate on 55% of U.S. imports but deal stalled), Japan, South Korea, El Salvador, Argentina, Ecuador, and Guatemala, engaged in talks involving tariff reductions or barrier removals, though outcomes varied (some frameworks pending finalization).
So they are all happening.
U.S. economy grows by 4.3% in third quarter, much more than expected
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 2:56 pm
LINK
quote:
U.S. gross domestic product, a sum of all goods and services produced in the sprawling U.S. economy, expanded by 4.3% in the July-September period, the Commerce Department said in its initial reading of third-quarter growth. Economists polled by Dow Jones expect a gain of 3.2%.
Consumer spending expanded by 3.5% in the third quarter
quote:
In your opinion, when we set tariffs, should our goal be:
1. Increasing tariff revenue
2. Increasing domestic production
3. Leveraging for a reduction in their tariffs on US goods
And please, please don't say "all of the above".
It is all of the above. Why would we not say it?
quote:
BS. We have the numbers. Tariffs have been tried before. You won't find any right leaning economist that will agree with you on the use of tariffs. It is as simple as that.
I can.
BTW. Economist missed the growth by ALOT.
yes Tariffs have been tried and worked for hundreds of years.
quote:
Except Trump is not doing this to "shore up strategic industries". He has put tariffs on basically all imports
There are things that Trump has placed more on. You know that. He is getting concession after concession on moving things back to the USA that are critical. And you know that too.
quote:
Forget about the inflation argument. Tariffs bring lower economic activity.
They do not. Which is why our economy grew at 4.3% killing expectations.
quote:
They are a tax on consumers. The government is taking their money. Money with which consumers could buy more goods and services.
Again, it's not the whole picture, but I know that you actually know that. It's sad that you try to form this strictly around 1 policy with in the economic plan.
re: Nov CPI Beats Estimates
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 2:43 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I’m indoctrinated by real world business. I have been on the docks and I know how tariffs are levied and who pays.
I don't think you are in the real world. I think you are in the past. Sort of like brick and mortar vs online store fronts.
You are living in a new economy that's not the same as it was.
quote:
Tariffs that we levy, raise prices on the goods that they’re levied against. Tariffs that are levied on the goods that we ship overseas also raises the price of our goods.
Yes. A one time increase. But as pointed out, that's placing the whole economic policy by this admin in to a tiny box called "tariffs alone".
There are other things taking place to mitigate that. That's in the box called "The rest of the Story"
quote:
If you don’t realize it, good for you but it’s happening. You have chosen to not realize it.
Wrong. I have chosen to view the WHOLE picture. So here's your chance. Can you tell me the rest of the plan by this Admin?
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 2:11 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Shocked that this got anchored.
Because you are a troll spreadin troll crap all over the board.
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 2:10 pm to retired_tiger
quote:
I did not make a bet. You were talking with someone else.
I simply provided the accurate information
That is taking the bet. And NO you did not. You did a screen shot with no link that showed nothing but a headline.
Trump was never charged with rape. Ever. Therefore he can not be guilty of rape.
In the words of Red Forman, "DUMBASS!"
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 11:47 am to retired_tiger
You should be banned. You lost the bet.
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 10:57 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
To think that a man accused of rape by several people
Accused is not guilt. You raped my grandmother! She said so.
quote:
found guilty of rape cant possibly commit rape.
Who Trump? You might want to link that. Ban bet that you can not link to Trump being found guilty of RAPE. Put your posting ability on the line.
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 10:55 am to whatiknowsofar
117th (2021–2023) Senate control: Democrats House Control: Democrats
So they could not do it then? Instead they used every other form to try and take him out... just left this on the table?
1- Any sane person should be able to see the massive flaw in those pages to understand why they did not use it and why it never made it past the taking of information. Zero Credibility.
2- Any real person, not bent on trolling, would be able to grasp the flaw in the DEMS who controlled both the house and senate and used every conceivable tactic to actually JAIL Trump but left this alone.
quote:
Because congress got off their asses
So they could not do it then? Instead they used every other form to try and take him out... just left this on the table?
1- Any sane person should be able to see the massive flaw in those pages to understand why they did not use it and why it never made it past the taking of information. Zero Credibility.
2- Any real person, not bent on trolling, would be able to grasp the flaw in the DEMS who controlled both the house and senate and used every conceivable tactic to actually JAIL Trump but left this alone.
quote:
Didn’t Steele dossier not teach you a thing?
Nope
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 10:45 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Are we now supposed to believe that the DNC has credible evidence to support these random allegations on the eve of the 2020 election and chose rather to sit on it?
You and I both know what this is about. Mid Terms. Watch them start mentioning impeachment if elected.
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 10:40 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
This thread turning out exactly how I thought it would. Tons of fingers in ears screaming lalalalalala
No it's a bunch of people laughing at you because you can not digest the information with logic.
re: Donald Trump named in Epstein files
Posted by BCreed1 on 12/23/25 at 10:31 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Because Donald Trump tried to bury it.
Who was the president in 2021, 2022, 2023,2024?? Yeah. That's right. Biden.
They went after Trump[ to BK him, to jail him... the man has a mug shot now.... and yu think that they would not have used this?
You can not be that dumb!
quote:
Clark14
Oh look. A new ignorant dumb arse is in the PT
quote:
We have a constitution that defines the limits.
That's what I just said. It also has rules FOR gov involvement.
quote:
Things like medicare and medicaid were created in the 1960s.
And? That has jack shite to do with my comment. Our Gov started the first National Bank in 1791 and then BAILED IT OUT!
So we were socialist then?
Whiskey Rebellion (1794): A federal excise tax on whiskey angered frontier farmers and distillers, leading to violent protests. President Washington's forceful response (marching troops) showed the new government's power to enforce its laws, even against economic interests
Socialist then too rght.
how many more examples do you need.
So again, rectify your position with our history. You can not and will not because it exposes you.
quote:
The fact you think people who want less government intervention are socialists goes to highlight your complete ignorance on civics in general.
Conservatives are not ZERO Gov. That's anarchist. Conservatives believe in a limited gov. Limited does NOT equal ZERO Gov.
Popular
0












